Troy bilt 27 ton log splitter
Defending the Draft 2023: Los Angeles Chargers
2023.06.06 04:57 MaIorbas Defending the Draft 2023: Los Angeles Chargers
Preface: There’s really no way to look back at the Chargers’ 2022 season without starting at the end. The team blew a 27-0 lead to the Jaguars in the wild card round in what can only be described as the peak of decades of cruelty by the football gods directed at the Chargers. In a year that began with Super Bowl aspirations thanks to an extremely talented on-paper roster, and included a regular season of injury after injury after injury (Justin Herbert, Rashawn Slater, Keenan Allen, Mike Williams, etc.), the finale could not have been more crushing. Criticism and ridicule has rained down on head coach Brandon Staley and offensive coordinator Joe Lombardi,
and the latter was promptly fired at the end of the season to the rejoicing of fans everywhere. But now we begin, again. The Super Bowl hopes are very much alive. The roster saw very few changes in free agency as the front office and coaching staff clearly believe the failure of the 2022 season was generally not an issue with the assembled players. But there is a much higher sense of urgency this year, and it’s not an exaggeration to say the team is going “all in” on the final cheap year of Justin Herbert’s rookie deal. Contracts have been structured in a way that will force significant cuts after the 2023 season just to get the team to salary cap compliance. This year may be do-or-die for both Tom Telesco and Brandon Staley.
Free Agency Recap
Losses:
G Matt Feiler, LB Drue Tranquill, EDGE Kyle Van Noy, QB Chase Daniel, CB Bryce Callahan, WR Deandre Carter, S Nasir Adderley, LB Troy Reeder, DL Breiden Fehoko, WR Michael Bandy, OT Storm Norton Five starters on this list: Feiler, Tranquill, Callahan, Carter, and Adderley. Letting Drue Tranquill leave is by far the most controversial decision here, especially since he ended up going to the Chiefs. He played very well last year, but seems like the idea here is that he was a factor in the defense’s struggle against the run. Feiler was a disaster last season after a great 2021, and Jamaree Salyer should be an immediate upgrade. Callahan is still a free agent and a reunion is not out of the question. Van Noy was great as a fill-in when Bosa was injured, but the team wants to get younger at the position. Carter was a quiet signing who outperformed his contract and provided much needed depth but again, too old. Adderley was benched in the season finale and then retired. The rest were backups and rotational players.
Additions: LB Eric Kendricks, DL Nick Williams That’s it, that’s the list. Eric Kendricks steps in as the starter next to Kenneth Murray who he can hopefully help mentor into being a good linebacker. And theoretically, he will be an upgrade in run defense over Drue Tranquill. Williams was signed after the draft as insurance for the injured Austin Johnson and Otito Ogbonnia. He may not make the team. The Chargers used most of the rest of their cap space re-signing free agents like Trey Pipkins, Morgan Fox, and Donald Parham. They still have about $12.5M to work with, pending the upcoming Justin Herbert mega-deal.
Draft Needs
WR: The trio of Keenan Allen, Mike Williams, and Josh Palmer is one of the best in the league. However, with their contracts, there’s really no chance Allen and Williams will be Chargers in 2024. This group also lacks a speed element.
EDGE: Similar to WR, the starting duo of Bosa and Mack is elite but they are expensive and getting older. The depth behind them is just Chris Rumph.
TE: Gerald Everett is solid but on the last year of his deal. Donald Parham has potential but can’t stay healthy. Tre’ McKitty is a blocking TE who isn’t a very good blocker.
CB: JC Jackson is an enormous question mark, both from a health and performance standpoint. Michael Davis is a free agent after 2023. Ja’Sir Taylor is penciled in as the starting slot corner after very limited playing time last year.
OL: This is the strongest starting five the Chargers have had in a decade but the depth behind them both inside and out is weak.
LB: Eric Kendricks and Kenneth Murray will start, but Murray is auditioning to be on the team next year and Kendricks is old. The depth behind them is just Nick Niemann and Amen Ogbongbemiga.
S: JT Woods was a 2022 3rd round pick but barely played in 2022. Alohi Gilman stepped up when needed, but relying on him to start is risky.
RB: Austin Ekeler requested a trade, and even though it looked very unlikely to happen, the team needs to think about life after him in 2024. Neither Josh Kelley or Isaiah Spiller have shown they can handle a full workload.
KPR: With Deandre Carter’s departure, the team has no one with real return experience.
The Draft
1.21: Quentin Johnston - WR, TCU In hindsight, this pick should have been more obvious. The Chargers have been very strict about their size thresholds for wide receivers over the years, and despite countless debates about Johnston vs Zay Flowers vs Jordan Addison, the big guy from TCU won out. This was an immediately controversial pick among fans as many believed the speedy Flowers or the crafty Addison would be more suited to filling the biggest need in this position group: speed and separation. But while Johnston may not be your traditional deep threat, his game speed and GPS tracking data suggest a more dynamic skillset than he showed at the combine. And one area where he does beat those two guys that was probably overlooked as a need: run after catch ability. Johnston was elite at that in college, and that looks to be his primary role for the Chargers. New OC Kellen Moore will use him like he did Ceedee Lamb in Dallas. And since he will start the year at number three on the depth chart at best, he won’t be under pressure to carry the offense as a rookie while he learns from the veterans in front of him.
2.54: Tuli Tuipulotu - EDGE, USC After WR, the Chargers’ clear next biggest need was at EDGE and Tuli was the consensus best available. The team has also shown a penchant for drafting local kids from USC and UCLA over the last few years. He was extremely productive in his final season in college where he put up 13.5 sacks playing both on the edge and the interior. In the draft process, many people questioned if he would bulk up to be a full time DT or slim down to play the EDGE. It ended up being the latter as he weighed 266lbs at the combine. Tuli will provide valuable depth behind Bosa and Mack as a rookie, while also having the opportunity to play inside on passing downs like he did in college.
3.85: Daiyan Henley - LB, Washington State The Chargers lost two linebackers to free agency: Drue Tranquill and Troy Reeder. Tranquill was the team’s best coverage linebacker, and Reeder was key depth while also being a core special teams player. Enter Daiyan Henley, who could fill both of those roles by himself. With Kenneth Murray likely off the team in 2024, Henley has the opportunity to earn a starting job over the course of the season. He is a recent convert to the linebacker position and there is still much room for growth. At the very least, he will be an immediate special teams contributor. Staley and Telesco both raved about his prowess in that phase of the game after picking him.
*
4.125: Derius Davis - WR, TCU * Another TCU receiver! This pick was definitely a surprise, as many people projected him to be a late day 3 pick. But the Chargers coaching staff said after the draft that they believed he was the best return man available, and that they wanted to draft a starter in the 4th round. Davis was indeed one of the best returners in the country at TCU, and also can add some juice on offense even if he ends up limited to a gadget role. Either way, here’s some killer speed for the Chargers offense.
5.156: Jordan McFadden - OL, Clemson In the last few drafts, the Chargers have shown a lot of love for late round tackle-to-guard converts. Jamaree Salyer was the steal of the 2022 draft in the sixth round. McFadden played both tackle and guard in college on both sides of the line, and some scouts believe he may even be able to play some center. For the Chargers he will compete with Brenden Jaimes for the swing guard role, and maybe even push Foster Sarrell to be the swing tackle. Key depth for a position group that needed it.
6.200: Scott Matlock - DL, Boise State Matlock is a solid run defender with some pass rush upside who will get to learn behind a strong trio of veteran starters. And with Austin Johnson and Otito Ogbonnia both rehabbing major knee injuries, he may end up seeing some decent playing time this season. I’m very intrigued by his upside, and Staley has a good track record of getting good play from late round DTs.
7.239: Max Duggan - QB, TCU The Los Angeles Horned Frogs are ready to take the NFL by storm in 2023 (hopefully to face the Philadelphia Bulldogs in a championship rematch). The Chargers historically have carried three QBs on the active roster, and with only two signed going into the draft, it seemed like a strong possibility they would pick one. So here’s Max Duggan, who despite leading TCU to the Natty was generally not loved by scouts. He has a ton of athletic ability but the finer points of playing QB need to be worked on. There is absolutely potential to be a long term backup to Justin Herbert though, if he can beat out Easton Stick.
Notable UDFAs Jerrod Clark - DL, Coastal Carolina: Most people expected Clark to be drafted, and the Chargers gave him a lot of money for a UDFA. I would not be surprised at all to see him make the roster as an additional run defender.
Cam Jones - CB, Ohio State: Another guy who could have been drafted, there are depth spots at corner up for grabs and Jones is an intriguing option.
Tiawan Mullen - CB, Indiana: Mullen used to have a pretty high draft stock but fell hard in the process. The Chargers are thin at slot corner and he could earn a role.
Mikel Jones - LB, Syracuse: There’s a wide open competition for ILB5 that will most likely be decided by special teams.
Roster Prediction
QB (3):
Justin Herbert, Easton Stick, Max Duggan
RB (5):
Austin Ekeler, Joshua Kelley, Isaiah Spiller, Larry Rountree, Zander Horvath
WR (5):
Keenan Allen,
Mike Williams,
Josh Palmer, Quentin Johnston, Derius Davis
TE (4):
Gerald Everett, Donald Parham, Tre’ McKitty, Stone Smartt
OT (3):
Rashawn Slater,
Trey Pipkins, Foster Sarrell
OG (4):
Zion Johnson,
Jamaree Salyer, Brenden Jaimes, Jordan McFadden
C (2):
Corey Linsley, Will Clapp
EDGE (4):
Joey Bosa,
Khalil Mack, Tuli Tuipulotu, Chris Rumph
IDL (6):
Sebastian Joseph-Day,
Austin Johnson,
Morgan Fox, Otito Ogbonnia, Scott Matlock, Jerrod Clark
LB (5):
Kenneth Murray,
Eric Kendricks, Daiyan Henley, Nick Niemann, Amen Ogbongbemiga
CB (5):
Michael Davis,
Asante Samuel Jr.,
JC Jackson, Ja’Sir Taylor, Deane Leonard
S (4):
Derwin James,
Alohi Gilman, JT Woods, Mark Webb
K (1):
Cameron Dicker P (1):
JK Scott LS (1):
Josh Harris Conclusion
Super Bowl or bust.
submitted by
MaIorbas to
NFL_Draft [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 21:36 RestlessDreamer32 Spent the last 10+ years of my life being a truly horrible person. If I can change, I'd like to think others can too.
If any of this is breaking rule 7, I apologize. If this is also too long, I apologize.
Growing up on the spectrum, social norms were not something that came easily to me. My emotions came and went in extremes, and it became easy to obsess on things. Being autistic was never an excuse for how horrid I was. I always felt second place to my older sister who out-shined me in every way, so it led me to treating my mother and step-father poorly. They did often blame me for things I never did, and it didn't help, but didn't excuse how I reacted. Looking back, they were trying so hard for me, but I was an ungrateful little prick. Just about every major blow-up in our house stemmed from me. I never even tried to be better. Even if I never would excel in academics, I could have strived to be a good son at the very least. I never wanted to clean up after myself, and groaned at the idea of having to learn to do my own laundry. All I cared about was sitting in my room playing video games. I never willingly helped to clean up the house or help them unless it would benefit me. The value of money was greatly distorted to me, and I'd think 10 minutes of doing the dishes would equal out to earning $20 from my parents who were already barely middle class raising 2 kids. I'd feel stolen from if I wouldn't get what I wanted and I constantly felt like I was being wronged. I had to make myself the victim in every way and refused to accept responsibility for anything. My friends at school straight up thought my parents were abusive for years because of how I would talk about them. One Christmas, my Mom saved up money she probably didn't have to get me a new laptop after mine had broken. When I saw that it was a budget laptop that "couldn't play the games I wanted it to", I threw a massive fit and told her I didn't want it. She told me she was going to just return it and since I was still out a computer, this wasn't good enough for me. Again, I was apparently a victim of abuse having my "hard earned Christmas" torn away from me by a greedy and hateful mother. I tried to run away from home. The laptop did everything I needed it to, but it looked "basic" and I didn't want my class-mates thinking I was poor, when in my city, most kids were.
I had this weird irrational fear of other people thinking I was poor and to this day I have no idea where it came from. Mom packs me a hand-made lunch rather than giving me an expensive Lunchable? I'd throw the entire thing out and not eat because I thought it would somehow make me look less poor. It was so bad that when I'd order a meal from McDonald's, I'd specify I wanted each item rung in individually and didn't want a meal deal. To me, meal deals were for "poor people who couldn't afford to get the items individually", even though all it did was make me look stupid and bad with money. Even when I finally got a job, I was bad with money. If I got an item on sale, I felt like crap because "sales are for poor people". If I had money, I'd spend it all down to the last penny, meaning I'd often have to beg my barely middle class mother for money. I'd spend hundreds of dollars on anime box sets and video games, but would leave myself no money for food. They never bothered to teach me financial literacy, but even if I they did, I already know I wouldn't have listened. I was only able to pay off all my bad debts and become good with finances a mere few years ago by realizing how badly I needed to change that before moving out of my parents house at the age of 27.
Going back to graduation, things really started to become bad. After my first love cheated on me after high school (together for nearly 3 years, met near the end of graduation) and proceeded to toy with my heart for half a year, something in me completely snapped. Considering what a loser and AH I was to my family, I can't say I blame her for losing attraction. I got revenge by publicly branding her as the worst kind of harlot imaginable and wanted to do everything I could to ruin her image. I had been cheated on, so I "knew how it felt" and would "never cheat". I became self righteous in this mindset, which is incredibly ironic considering how I went on to become. Becoming easily obsessed with things meant that when addiction took hold, it was incredibly difficult to break. I had met an absolutely amazing woman a couple years later and she treated me like gold. Literal wife material. Incredibly attractive. So what did I do? The first time a woman who wasn't her tried to flirt with me and get in my pants, I cheated on her. Apparently at this point in my life, I had become quite "attractive", because an odd amount of women started to come to me. Even ones who knew I was in a relationship already. I didn't turn a single one of them down. I even started to seek other women out on my own. I became hooked on the validation and let it control my life. I had no care for the safety of myself or my actual girlfriend who had no idea of all the women I was having sex with. All unprotected mind you. Eventually she found out and got mad at me for the years of betrayal and lying I had done, and even when I was clearly caught in the wrong, I didn't own up to being in the wrong. I didn't even try to apologize. I tried to gaslight her into making her think it was all her fault. Thankfully it didn't work and she knew that she was wronged.
I had become a textbook narcissist. I checked off just about every box. I was obsessed with my looks and put myself above anyone else.
I "didn't need her" though, with all the women coming my way. I let sex completely take over my mind and my life. There wasn't a single moment I wasn't thinking about it. I'd take expensive cabs at 2AM or later just to go hook up with someone I'd only been talking to for an hour or less. Older women went for me a lot, and I'd be in my early 20s having women in their late 40s or 50's sleeping with me. I'd bail on plans with friends, family, and would even show up late for work because I'd be too busy hooking up with anyone willing. As horrible as I was, consent was always the most important factor for me and I made sure no one was ever pressured or felt pursued if they weren't interested. This means I just hooked up with people who were easy like I was, and there was a lot of them. Several a week and sometimes multiple a day. I had met another absolutely amazing woman who was wife material and dated her for a bit over 2 years, and I absolutely cheated on her for the majority of the relationship. I shattered her heart, and she has every right under the sun to hate my guts. After several years of this behavior, I finally realized and admitted to myself that I had an addiction. None of this made me happy. In fact, I was absolutely miserable. It put an even larger wedge between my family and I, and my friends were incredibly disappointed in me. The worst that ever happened to me were two instances where I was raped by someone I had long stopped consenting with. First held a knife to me and the second beat me until I stopped saying no. I'm sure for all the damage I'd done, I deserved it. I only ever got the clap a handful of times (stopped having sex until it was cleared each time). I surprisingly ended up not getting anyone pregnant (in a city full of single mothers who chase for child support, I would know if I did). By the end of it, I'd had sex with somewhere between 150-200 different women. I stopped remembering names, faces, and mentally blocked a lot of it out. All I had was a number tally, which became less clear as more were added. I had to stop. Cold turkey. This included the consumption of pornography, which definitely amplified my addiction.
I was beyond disgusted with myself, as I should have been. From that point on, my relationship with sex was incredibly rocky. I could no longer perform as I once did and ended up with erectile disfunction. I had finally come out of the closet as bisexual as well, because despite being a sex addict, I never let it extend to men, even though I was attracted to them. Men never pursued me either, so I never had that temptation. I wasn't completely put off of sex, and still had it when I did manage to date, but it no longer dictated how I lived my life and spent my days. Instead of sex, I let myself fall into another extreme. When people became so divided over world events, I let myself fall into the worst side of things and became a horribly bigoted and xenophobic person. I had mental mental gymnastics to justify my beliefs and met other people who shared them. I was a "free thinker" with no original views and all I did was further hurt and disappoint old friends I had. I'd post, comment, and share tons of hateful garbage to social media. People had every right to be offended. Lord knows the life I'd led prior gave me absolutely no room to judge anyone else, but I did.
I had tried to end my life on multiple occasions, but am glad I didn't.
This way of thinking was something I was able to free myself of 7 months ago. What sparked the change? This final change? I have no idea. I was sitting in front of my computer watching hateful content to further cement and validate my beliefs, and I just felt sick. I thought to myself "What the **** have I been doing with my life? What is all of this?" At that exact moment, I started to remove every negative presence I'd put out to the world. I had deleted every single comment, share, post, like, etc that I'd ever put on social media across all platforms. This actually took me around 2 weeks of clicking to accomplish. Until my activity logs on all socials were completely empty. My entire YouTube history was now cleared and my algorithm had been reset. I turned off anything and everything relating to the news or world events because all those topics did was make me unhappy. Then I announced on FB and Instagram the revelation I'd come to. An entire life of self awareness hitting me at once. I didn't sugarcoat anything to make myself look better. I was not a victim. I was no longer trying to hide who I was. I made a blanket apology to everyone who cared about me who I'd hurt and disappointed, making it known I'd make individual ones later. I added anyone who wanted to keep in contact on my hiatus to Discord, and then deleted those FB and Insta accounts entirely. I unplugged from the world of social media for 2 months. You'd think I'd need more time, but I didn't. I guess the one perk of being autistic was being able to focus heavily on one specific thing. I was able to do a life's worth of thinking and personal change during this time. When I came back, I reached out to everyone I could think of that I'd wronged or not presented my best self to, apart from a few people I knew that I had no right to ever present myself to. People who are far better in their lives not thinking about my existence. I apologized and let it be known that I was not asking for or expecting forgiveness, as I have no right to it. I let them know what I was doing to be better in my life and wished them well. To my surprise, it was an overwhelmingly positive response. People actually forgave me and were happy to see me doing better. I can never truly make up for how I had spent my life before, but all I can do is spend each day being someone people can be glad to know.
I wasn't "finally getting back to being me". There was no previous version of "me" that I ever wanted to return to. For the first time in my life since birth, I was blank slate. I held no hatred or contempt for anything or anyone, besides myself. I accepted any and all blame, and didn't try to justify anything with excuses or justifications. I was able to dictate the reasons and pinpoint where I'd gone wrong in my life and fully understand why things happened as they did. Importantly, I finally started going to therapy and seeking help. Not because I fear I'll ever return back to my old self, but because I know I permanently damaged my mind and am plagued with regret.
I'm finally letting myself return to old hobbies that brought me joy, but no longer need validation to enjoy them. I'm finally playing my massive backlog of video games, hanging out with friends uninterrupted, watching movies, re-discovering my love of photography and art. I am also going to start painting, even though all I use to do was draw.
I feel that if I can become better, I hope it gives hope to others to try to be as well.
**TLDR**: There isn't really a TLDR for such a thing. If you don't want to read it, I fully understand.
submitted by
RestlessDreamer32 to
DecidingToBeBetter [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 07:22 cspachholz Texas A&M (8) v.s. Stanford (5) on 6/3/2023
2023.06.03 23:57 Caulibflower Defending the Draft: Seattle Seahawks
Seattle’s 2023 class represents the second half of a draft-based reload which began last year, after the Seahawks finally admitted they were suffocating Russell Wilson and traded him to Denver so that he could fulfill his destiny. We were left with an unevenly-talented but surprisingly feisty roster which outperformed expectations all the way into the playoffs.
Our front office has been candid about some of its past mistakes in the draft, the most glaring of which have come when the team goes for need over talent. Last year, with the first half of our extra draft picks, we focused on acquiring as much talent as possible, rather than trying to address specific holes. The 2023 draft is very similar in that regard. In free agency, the team was restrained but practical, and added a few mid-range players to ensure a baseline of competency at the most problematic positions. This allowed them even more flexibility and leeway to be aggressive about drafting for talent.
What Seattle wants to be in 2023: I believe that Seattle would have loved to take Anthony Richardson, but the price to trade up was clearly too high. BUT - this is also a testament to the faith that they have in Geno Smith. They were not going to give up multiple first round picks when they think that Geno’s ceiling includes the potential for a Super Bowl run. I believe that is how the front office is looking at this team: They have a boatload of high draft picks over the last two years, which means an unusual number of blue chip prospects on cheap contracts. They also have a QB who has far outplayed his expectations, and if he can continue playing to even a
similar level in 2023, will be outplaying his updated contract as well. I do think that Seattle has tried to take the burden off of Geno with the way that they drafted - but again,
this has always been Pete Carroll’s philosophy. Pete Carroll
doesn’t want the team to live or die on the arm of the quarterback. So, Seattle drafted to make every other part of the roster stronger and more competitive.
THE DRAFT 1.05) Devon Witherspoon - CB, Illinois While I haven’t made much of Seattle’s needs, it’s obvious to anyone who watches the Seahawks that the defense needs dramatic improvement for this team to reach the next level. Tariq Woolen was a huge surprise as a rookie and a breakout star at right cornerback, but Seattle lacked an obvious answer on the opposite side. Devon Witherspoon is a true tone-setter for the defense as well as the perfect complement to Tariq at left cornerback. Where Tariq is supremely long, fast and fluid, Devon Witherspoon is smaller but more in-your-face. He’s
violent, which is an unusual as well as a very exciting trait to list among the first attributes of a cornerback. The speed at which he triggers and the force with which he strikes ballcarriers are special for the position, and that physicality is especially welcome on the left side where he’ll be playing. But he’s also an adept cover man who posted great ball production in college (3 picks and 14 passes broken up in 2022), and for as much as his hitting pops off the screen, it’s actually his mental game which is most exciting of all.
He is one of those players who always seems to know what is happening before anyone else does - it looks like he’s guessing, but when he’s consistently right, over and over, it becomes apparent that he has a truly unusual aptitude for reading the game. That’s not just my own opinion, either - in Pete Carroll’s own words:
“His make-up … how he approaches the game, the way he sees his opportunities and stuff. I’ve always held Troy in high regard in that. (Devon Witherspoon) is the closest I’ve come to that, someone talking and acting and performing like that … We’ve not seen a guy like this.” 1.20) Jaxon Smith-Njigba - WR, Ohio State Tyler Lockett is 30, and going into his age-31 season. People talk about his upcoming cap hit, but he’s still nearly un-cuttable until 2025 due to dead money. Is a trade possible? Maybe, but that somehow feels unlikely. Does the team know that Tyler plans to retire relatively soon? It’s plausible - he does already have a fairly successful side gig going as a realtor. But where I’m actually going with this is … Seattle really needed a 3rd wide receiver even if the whole gang stays together. Dee Eskridge was meant to be that guy a couple of years ago, and it just hasn’t happened. JSN is on another level as a prospect, and by taking over the slot, allows DK and Tyler more freedom to attack the deep third of the field. I think we’ll see all three of them lined up in every position over the course of the season, but the way that JSN is able to attack the short and middle areas with body positioning and quick separation will potentially change the way our whole passing game works - even if he only logs, say, 50 or 60 catches. I’d be really happy with that from him in year 1.
It’s worth mentioning as well - our current OC (who some speculate could be our HC-in-waiting) is Shane Waldron, who was with the Rams as they unlocked the 90+ catch potential of Robert Woods and Cooper Kupp. JSN has the exact attributes to thrive in that kind of scheme - lots of digs, crosses, and pop routes off of play action - probably even more so than DK or Tyler. So even if he doesn’t go huge in year 1, this feels like a slam dunk pick for the future of this offense.
2.37) Derick Hall - EDGE, Auburn Similar to Devon Witherspoon, Derick Hall is violent. The Seahawks defense has distinctly lacked a certain intimidation factor over the last few years, and Hall is another attempt to rectify that. There were some split opinions on Hall, but
there are some indications that the Seahawks had Hall rated as a first-round talent on their big board. He’s not a refined rusher, but he’s very well-built and physical, and meets blockers with speed, aggression, and power.
Oftentimes we see elite athletes at the EDGE position we assume that they’ll be finesse players, but Hall is the opposite: while he’s squatty (a shade under 6’3” and 255) and very long (34” arms), he also boasts a 93rd percentile broad and 94th percentile 40 yard dash: he’s not trying to beat you around the corner, he’s a freight train with a dragster’s throttle and he’s going to hit you at full speed. He joins an already-young and talented group of EDGE defenders that includes stud free agent signing Uchenna Nwosu and two other recent 2nd-rounders in Darrell Taylor and Boye Mafe. Especially with EDGE rushers, it’s great to have a rotation. You love having a deep group that keeps each other fresh and allows you the flexibility to adapt to situations or matchups. Taylor and Mafe bring more of the typical bend and burst you expect from athletic EDGE players, and Hall’s power and violence is a welcome addition to the mix.
2.52) Zach Charbonnet - RB, UCLA While fantasy football nerds everywhere donned black to mourn the wasted futures of both Ken Walker III and Zach Charbonnet,
I chuckled to myself. There’s quite a lot of detail on this situation in that link, but the basic upshot is this: Seattle’s front office had Zach Charbonnet very high on their draft board.
He was in consideration as early as pick 37, where they took Derick Hall. Our running game didn’t work very well last year when KWIII was injured, and they want to make sure that doesn’t happen again. But furthermore, even while KWIII was one of the most explosive running backs in the league as a rookie, he was also inconsistent. He ripped off a bunch of big runs, but there were a lot of others where he left meat on the bone.
I’m not suggesting that the rookie version of KWIII is his ceiling, but there was more room for improvement than I think is appreciated by a lot of people who don’t watch the Seahawks. Charbonnet doesn’t have the same breakaway ability, but on a run-to-run basis, he appears to be more consistent at getting 3 or 4 yards in the kinds of spots where KWIII was getting 1 or 2. Pete Carroll
really wants a consistent run game, and if KWIII isn’t delivering that, he might just turn out to be the most exciting 1B in the league. Or maybe he’ll really take ownership of the 1A role and this situation looks a bit like the best of Nick Chubb and Kareem Hunt for the next 3 years. Bottom line: Charbonnet provides high-end depth to a position that has really struggled with injuries in recent years while also offering more potential as a pass blocker, more skill as a receiver, and more consistency and physicality as a ballcarrier. It’ll be really interesting to see how that shakes out in the touch ratios, but it’s not out of the realm of possibility that Charbonnet comes in and takes the priority spot on the depth chart.
Pete Carroll indicates that he and Ken Walker will just have to battle it out. 4.108) Anthony Bradford - OG, LSU While Seattle managed to nab not one but
two starting offensive tackles in last year’s draft, the interior offensive line continued to be a mixed bag. Damien Lewis is entering the 4th year of his rookie contract and has been a little up-and-down since moving from RG to LG after a very good rookie season, and RG Gabe Jackson is currently a free agent. One of Seattle’s only notable FA signings was Detroit’s OC/G Evan Brown, whose 1-year deal gave us a veteran baseline at both C and G going into the draft. They've also got Phil Haynes, a 4th round pick himself from 2019 who's never secured a starting role but has shown some ability when given the opportunity. Anthony Bradford will be expected to compete with both of them for the RG spot in 2023 and hopefully be ready to take over by 2024.
Bradford is another tone-setter. His agility is average, but
his combination of bulk and power is high-end - he’s 330 pounds and put up 34 bench reps while still testing in the top 25% of all interior linemen for his jumps and sprints. This pick is another demonstration of Seattle’s priorities: they want to play a physical brand of football on both sides of the ball. There’s a simplicity to this pick, summarized neatly by an anonymous offensive line coach at the bottom of of his NFL.com prospect profile:
“I’ll take size and power all day over finesse guards who can move but don’t have any pop to them.” It’s worth noting that Seattle picked here because Denver gave up their 2024 3rd round pick to swap 4.108 for pick 3.83. It seems relatively likely that 2024 pick is higher than 3.83, which in turn sort of makes this feel like a free 4th rounder. (Why does Denver want us to have so much of their draft capital?)
4.123) Cameron Young - DT, Mississippi State One of Seattle’s biggest needs was interior defensive line, and this feels like one of the most obvious ‘need’ picks of the draft - though it’s telling that it doesn’t feel like Seattle specifically targeted a need until the middle rounds.
Cam Young isn’t a dynamic pass rusher, but he’s well-built for the interior and has very, very long arms (34.5”). He’s got a good anchor and combined with that length, gives us a viable player at nose tackle. He doesn’t
have to be flashy to be an early contributor on the interior rotation, and by day 3 any consistent contribution feels like great value for any pick.
5.151) Mike Morris - DL, Michigan Mike Morris is an interesting pick because he’s likely to play a different position for us than he played at Michigan, where he often played from a 2-point stance. He’s most likely going to be a 5-tech for us (a base end in 3-4/hybrid looks), because while he’s
athletic - in the sense that he moves very well, shows decent balance, and has good hand-eye coordination - he’s not really explosive or twitchy enough to drop back into coverage or challenge offensive tackles with speed.
But he’s also huge. He’s over 6’5”, weighed 275 at the combine and will play around 290 for Seattle.
Pete Carroll has indicated that he’ll play a similar role to Dre’Mont Jones and Jarran Reed, who are both 300-lb defensive ends in our scheme. Similarly to Young, a lack of depth in the rotation opens the possibility for early snaps.
5.154) Olusegun Oluwatimi - OC, Michigan Now, he’s a pick that got a number of people pretty excited. I was personally a little bit surprised that they took Mike Morris ahead of “Olu Olu,” as center was both a bigger need than 5-tech, and Olu Olu was also widely regarded as a better prospect. But not only was Olu Olu regarded as a better prospect - many people thought that he could go as early as the 3rd or 4th round. PFF loves him, the Senior Bowl’s Jim Nagy loves him, and so did CFB’s awards - in 2022 he won both the Rimington Award as the nations best center as well as the Outland Trophy as the nation’s best interior lineman.
How did he slip to the 5th round? When you look at his scouting reports, you see terms like ‘functional athleticism’ and ‘adequate agility.’ We don’t have agility numbers for him, so it may well be that he simply knows his strengths - and that said, he
does have some physical advantages. He’s about 310, which is on the larger side for a center, pretty good length, and also shows some legitimate explosiveness and power with his jumps and bench. But beyond that, he was a 4-year starter at Michigan who has loads of experience against top competition and a wide variety of defensive schemes. He’s smart. He can make all the calls, he knows where to be, and a center play goes a long way when a guy is in the right place at the right time while bringing plenty of power with him. Like Anthony Bradford, Olu will be challenging Evan Brown for an immediate role on the interior line. There’s guarantee, but there is a real chance this is our starting center for the next several years - and for a 5th round pick, just the legitimacy of that possibility represents a tremendous value.
6.198) Jerrick Reed II - S/DB, New Mexico Not many people know who Jerrick Reed is, and that’s ok - he’s used to it. An undersized defensive back at 5’9” 196, Reed has done nothing but produce from high school, to community college, and eventually to a D-I scholarship to New Mexico State where he started for all 4 years. This continues a trend: the Seahawks again have taken a smart, tough player with lots of starting experience, who is a very hard worker, and who loves and understands the game. That will be important for a late-round pick trying to make the team, but the path to playing time might be shorter than you’d think.
When Seattle signed Julian Love in free agency, there were questions about what that meant for Quandre Diggs and Jamal Adams.
Apparently, per Pete Carroll, it doesn’t mean anything - they intend to play a lot of 3-safety looks. It’s worth noting that this is something they were already doing at the beginning of last year, before Jamal Adams got injured (again). If this defense is playing with 3 safeties much of the time - which is made even more likely by the lack of depth and talent at off-ball linebacker - then a 4th or 5th safety is much closer than usual to being an immediate backup. Reed’s not going to get any looks on the outside, but he can legitimately back up the free safety, strong safety, and nickel positions. He also has a ton of experience on special teams, and the ability to fill 4 or more different roles on a squad is exactly the kind of thing that makes depth guys stick to final rosters.
7.237) Kenny McIntosh - RB, Georgia Similar to Olu Olu, Kenny McIntosh is a player who many people thought could go much earlier than he did. The problem with Kenny McIntosh - in my opinion - is simply that he had a very worrying series of predraft measurements. He seemingly dropped weight to run at the combine,
but only managed a 4.63 at 204 lbs. He was back up to 216 for Georgia’s pro day, but again only managed a 4.66 along with some other mediocre-to-poor numbers. Teams seemed more interested in other more-explosive backs, or runners with better resumes as pure ballcarriers.
But at this point in the draft, that lack of interest became Seattle’s gain. Because in Seattle, Kenny McIntosh is not only going to be allowed to play to his strengths - he’s going to be
expected to, because there’s a specific role on this team for a player exactly like him. One of the Seahawks most underrated losses this offseason was running back Travis Homer. It wouldn’t surprise me if most people don’t know who he is, but he had a definite role as a third-down back in addition to special teams duties. Like Jerrick Reed, it will definitely help McIntosh’s case for a roster spot if he can prove his worth on special teams.
But he may not have to. Travis Homer was not a particularly good ballcarrier. He was small - also around 205 - wasn’t creative, wasn’t powerful, wasn’t especially fast or twitchy. But he was a tremendous pass blocker and a serviceable receiver, and those two things earned him about a quarter of all offensive snaps (484) in games he played in over the last 3 seasons. If that seems high, that’s because it is - especially for a running back who only touched the ball 106 times in that span. Compare that to DeeJay Dallas, who had about half-again as many touches on a similar number of snaps.
While Ken Walker III and Zach Charbonnet are going to be the running backs who the offense specifically tries to feed the ball, Kenny McIntosh could easily be the running back that the team wants on the field in the most obvious passing situations. Zach Charbonnet was
also one of the most productive receivers among college running backs, but Kenny McIntosh is probably smoother and more refined as both a route runner and a receiver.
McIntosh registered zero drops on 90 targets, posted a PFF grade over 90 as a receiver, and is also already a very reliable pass blocker. That means there’s already a role for him on the Seahawks, and KWIII and Charbs aren’t necessarily in his way - if anything, those guys might be battling for the 3rd-down snaps that Seattle’s coaches assume will go to McIntosh. Again, as with several of these other day three picks - this 7th rounder enters training camp with a great shot to take hold of an important role early on. He may only log 20 carries and 20 catches in the stat book over the course of the season, but it might also be on 150-200 snaps, and in important game situations. And if he’s able to keep KWIII and Charbs that much fresher, and especially if he’s just
the best for those situations, once again that’s tremendous value for the back end of the draft.
I’m really excited for this draft class.
Go Hawks.
submitted by
Caulibflower to
NFL_Draft [link] [comments]
2023.06.02 20:18 jimbobbypaul Ranking the Top 131 FBS Programs of the Last 40 Years: 84. Iowa State
Main hub thread with the full 131 rankings For all the Cyclone fanatics out there, I see you guys. For the 6th worst Power 5 team on this list, Iowa State has had incredible support, averaging 50,000+ fans a year even during their lows. Finally, after years of struggling minus a few nice Dan McCarney years, Iowa State’s found a coach that’s brought them consistent success in Matt Campbell. Outside of Campbell’s first year in which he went 3-9 and the latest 4-8 season in 2022, the 5 years in between (2017-21) all place in my top 7 ISU seasons over the last 40 years. Whether last year was an outlier or if Iowa State will regress to their historical mean remains to be seen, but the last 6 years have been great compared to what fans have been accustomed to.
Best Seasons and Highlights
1. 2020: 7. Iowa State: 9-3 (30.160) 2. 2000: 27. Iowa State: 9-3 (13.294) 3. 2017: 32. Iowa State: 8-5 (12.780) 4. 2018: 37. Iowa State: 8-5 (8.477) 5. 2021: 40. Iowa State: 7-6 (5.442) 6. 2005: 37. Iowa State: 7-5 (3.574) 7. 2019: 43. Iowa State: 7-6 (1.761) 8. 2004: 42. Iowa State: 7-5 (-2.644) 9. 2001: 51. Iowa State: 7-5 (-3.334) 10. 2002: 57. Iowa State: 7-7 (-4.723) 11. 2012: 65. Iowa State: 6-7 (-7.162) 12. 2009: 63. Iowa State: 7-6 (-7.233) 13. 2011: 62. Iowa State: 6-7 (-8.169) 14. 1989: 56. Iowa State: 6-5 (-10.057) 15. 1986: 56. Iowa State: 6-5 (-10.436) 16. 1990: 58. Iowa State: 4-6-1 (-11.929) 17. 2010: 69. Iowa State: 5-7 (-13.761) 18. 1985: 60. Iowa State: 5-6 (-17.317) 19. 2022: 84. Iowa State: 4-8 (-18.173) 20. 1988: 66. Iowa State: 5-6 (-18.197) 21. 1992: 79. Iowa State: 4-7 (-21.249) 22. 1999: 79. Iowa State: 4-7 (-23.653) 23. 1993: 75. Iowa State: 3-8 (-23.926) 24. 1983: 79. Iowa State: 4-7 (-25.659) 25. 1991: 75. Iowa State: 3-7-1 (-26.248) 26. 2006: 92. Iowa State: 4-8 (-30.444) 27. 2007: 93. Iowa State: 3-9 (-31.101) 28. 2015: 97. Iowa State: 3-9 (-31.892) 29. 1998: 84. Iowa State: 3-8 (-31.989) 30. 1984: 85. Iowa State: 2-7-2 (-32.012) 31. 2016: 97. Iowa State: 3-9 (-32.276) 32. 1995: 84. Iowa State: 3-8 (-32.441) 33. 2013: 98. Iowa State: 3-9 (-34.411) 34. 1996: 94. Iowa State: 2-9 (-37.584) 35. 1987: 91. Iowa State: 3-8 (-37.886) 36. 2014: 115. Iowa State: 2-10 (-42.981) 37. 2008: 111. Iowa State: 2-10 (-48.885) 38. 2003: 107. Iowa State: 2-10 (-50.450) 39. 1994: 101. Iowa State: 0-10-1 (-53.566) 40. 1997: 105. Iowa State: 1-10 (-56.575) Overall Score: 9649 (84th)
- 184-283-5 record
- 0 conference titles
- 5-8 bowl record
- 5 consensus All-Americans
- 42 NFL players drafted
Iowa State certainly has a knack for producing really good RBs. 4 of their 5 All-Americans come from 2 RBs in Troy Davis (1995, ‘96) and Breece Hall (2020, ‘21). At just 5’8 183 lbs, Davis became the first player in NCAA history to rush for 2000 yards in back-to-back seasons, and remains one of only 2 players to ever do so. In 1995 he ran for 2010 yards and 15 TD, placing 5th in Heisman voting. He outdid himself a year later, rushing for 2185 yards and 21 TD, narrowly missing out on the Heisman, finishing to 2nd Florida QB Danny Wuerfel, who got 49% of the votes compared to Davis’ 43%. Davis won 3 of 4 regions, but lost badly in the South. Still, the tradition of producing strong RBs rings true, as Iowa State’s produced 8 RBs during the last 40 years with 2500+ career rushing yards. Notable NFL players include David Montgomery, Breece Hall, Allen Lazard, Pro Bowler Kelechi Osemele, and as a 49er fan, future Hall of Famer Brock Purdy.
Top 5 Seasons
Worst Season: 1997 (1-10 overall, 1-7 Big 12) Remember how good Troy Davis was, especially after I described him above? Well, his teams weren’t very good, going 3-8 in 1995 and 2-9 in 1996. So you can imagine how 1997 went after he had left for the NFL. Iowa State didn’t stand a chance in Dan McCarney’s 3rd year as head coach, and it’s honestly a miracle the Cyclones let him stay for so long, as it took 6 years for him to get his first winning season. The gamble paid off though, as he was eventually inducted into the Iowa State Hall of Fame. Still, 1997 was his worst year. They had a talented freshman QB by the name of Sage “Helicopter” Rosenfels on the roster, but he wouldn’t start for another 2 years. QB was not a big issue though, as Todd Bandhauer had a respectable year, completing 48% of passes for 2514 yards 20 TD 9 INT, leading the Big 12 in passing yards and TDs. Bandhauer was a 2-time All-Academic Big 12 selection, and is currently an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Colorado State. WR Tyrone Watley led the Big 12 in receiving yards with 827, and RB Darren Davis had 1000+ yards in just 9 games. Offense wasn’t a huge issue, but the defense gave up 44.8 PPG. The lone win on the year was 24-17 over 2-9 Baylor, and losses included 14-77 to #3 Nebraska and 20-63 to #13 Iowa, losing their 15th straight against the Hawkeyes.
5. 2021 (7-6 overall, 5-4 Big 12) For this season to be a disappointment but also top 5 on this list tells you how far Iowa State’s come under Matt Campbell. Make no mistake, it was a disappointment, finishing 7-6 after a preseason #7 ranking, but they were still the best 7-6 team in 2021 (out of 17 teams) by my metric. Iowa State returned 4th year starting QB Brock Purdy, consensus All-American Breece Hall, 2x 1st Team All-Big 12 TE Charlie Kolar, and Big 12 Defensive POTY LB Mike Rose, so the preseason expectations weren’t unfounded. A typical ISU slow start saw them barely beat Northern Iowa, and a classic Brian Ferentz Iowa performance had the Hawkeyes take a 27-10 lead (27-17 final) despite getting outgained 173-339 in yardage. 2 weeks later, a trap game 31-29 loss in Waco all but ended the Cyclones’ playoff hopes, despite outgaining Baylor by nearly 200 yards. However, in true Iowa State fashion, they rebounded to mess up Oklahoma State’s season a few weeks later, beating the #8 Cowboys 24-21 to improve to 5-2. A 2-4 finish was mostly because of location, going 2-0 at home and 0-4 in road/neutral sites. It was a squandered year for Iowa State, outscoring Big 12 opponents by an average of 12 PPG but going just 5-4. 8 starters on offense made 1st/2nd Team All-Big 12, by far the most in the conference. Breece repeated as consensus AA/Big 12 OPOTY with 1774 yards and 23 TD from scrimmage, while Rose earned 1st Team all-conference again.
4. 2018 (8-5 overall, 6-3 Big 12) For the first time since the Big 12 moved from divisions to a round robin format in 2013, Iowa State wasn’t picked in the bottom 2 with Kansas. Big 12 media picked them 7th, this time coming above Texas Tech, Baylor, and of course Kansas. But after starting QB Kyle Kempt went down in the season opener, and backup Zeb Noland went just 1-3, Matt Campbell gave a shot to a freshman by the name of Brock Purdy. In a sort of foreshadowing for names in the NFL, Kyle became a mentor to Brock, and Purdy exploded onto the scene, throwing for 4 TD and rushing for another in a 48-42 win at #25 Oklahoma State. He’d top that a week later, beating #6 West Virginia and Will Grier 30-14, this time the defense stepping up big to hold Grier to just 67 total yards. ISU never looked back with Purdy, and nearly made the Big 12 title game if they had beaten Texas. They finished the regular season 8-4, 3rd in the Big 12, and nearly beat 11-2 Washington State in the bowl. Campbell won Big 12 Coach of the Year for the 2nd straight season. Purdy was 6th in the nation in passing efficiency, completing 66% of passes for 2250 yards 16 TD 7 INT, on 10.2 YPA. RB David Montgomery had another 1000+ yard rushing season and has gone on to have a productive NFL career. WR Hakeem Butler was 3rd in the nation in yards per catch (22.0), getting 60 passes for 1318 yards and 9 TD.
3. 2017 (8-5 overall, 5-4 Big 12) Before Brock Purdy and Iowa State could run, the 2017 team had to walk. Years of effort from give-it-their-all players like Allen Lazard and Joel Lanning culminated in a magical 2018 season that might just be the fondest on this list. ISU had gone just 11-37 over the previous 4 seasons, so a 2nd to last place Big 12 finish was expected. After a 2-2 start, ISU pulled off maybe the biggest win in school history, beating #3 Oklahoma 38-31, who’d go on to make the playoff with Baker Mayfield winning the Heisman. LB Joel Lanning, who was the team’s starting QB the previous 2 seasons, was the Walter Camp Defensive Player of the Week, logging 8 tackles, 1 sack, 1 fumble recovery, as well as 9 rushes for 35 yards and 2 completions for 25 yards on offense. A few weeks later against Oklahoma State he’d become the 1st player in the last 10 years to record a pass TD, rush TD, and half sack in the same game. After the win over OU though, just a few weeks later Iowa State would ALSO beat #4 TCU 14-7!!! A few one possession losses later and ISU finished 7-5, but would beat yet another top 25 team in the bowl in #20 Memphis.
Lanning was named a 1st Team All-American by FWAA, racking up 114 tackles, 6 sacks, 5 TFL, 1 INT, 135 rushing yards, 47 passing yards, and 3 TD. Not bad for a former QB. QB Kyle Kempt was one of the most underrated stories of the season, emerging as the starter in the 5th game and going on to throw 15 TD to just 3 INT. Kempt was a 5th year walk-on who had only thrown 2 passes in his career prior to the Oklahoma game. By the time the season was over, he had 2 wins over top 5 teams, and today is still on the team as a coach.
2. 2000 (9-3 overall, 5-3 Big 12) Like the 2017 team, the 2000 Cyclones came out of nowhere, a dormant program that had gone just 27-80-3 the previous decade. ISU players knew the talent they had though, led by future NFL QB Sage Rosenfels, one of 9 players that would go on to make NFL rosters. Another would go on to join the Iowa Senate, and the late LB Justin Eilers would fight in the UFC. They played a very favorable schedule, going 8-3 in the regular season with 0 wins over Power 6 teams with a winning record, but did beat 7-4 Ohio, 8-5 UNLV, and rival Iowa for the Cy-Hawk. ISU put any “soft schedule” talk to rest when they beat the Big East’s 3rd placed team, Pitt, in the bowl 37-29. Rosenfels had a nice curtain call, winning offensive POTG with 23/34 passing for 308 yards and 2 TD. Rosenfels did what he had to during the year, with deceiving stats of 2298 passing yards 8 TD 12 INT. He was a solid runner though, and would become known for his patented “helicopter” move in the NFL, rushing for 381 yards and 10 TD. RB Ennis Haywood and C Ben Bruns were ISU’s two 1st Team All-Big 12 selections, as Haywood ran for 1237 yards and Bruns led the way. The 5’6(!) JJ Moses led the team in receiving with 775 yards, and was named team MVP.
1. 2020 (9-3 overall, 8-1 Big 12) Ahh, but it had to be the 2020 team at #1. Even my algorithm places this team way above 2000 even though they had the same record, with the 2000 team finishing ranked 27th and 2020 finishing ranked 7th. After a typical ISU slow start, losing 13-30 to UL Lafayette, the rest of the year couldn’t have gone much better. In the 3rd game they beat eventual B12 champion Oklahoma 37-30. Later on they beat #17 Texas in Darrel K Royal 23-20, essentially ensuring Tom Herman would be fired after the season, and stomped 6-4 West Virginia 42-6. ISU entered the Big 12 championship game against Oklahoma as the 1 seed, and had an opportunity at the end to win, but came up short 21-27. A 34-17 Fiesta Bowl win over Pac-12 champion Oregon was pretty satisfying though, and Iowa State finished with their highest ever postseason ranking at #9. They cleaned up in the Big 12 accolades, taking up 9 of the 22 1st Team all-conference slots. Breece Hall was Big 12 Offensive POTY and a consensus All-American, with 1752 yards and 23 TD from scrimmage. LB Mike Rose won Big 12 Defensive POTY with 99 tackles, 10.5 total TFL, and 5 INT. Campbell won Coach of the Year, and WR Xavier Hutchinson and DB Isheem Young won Big 12 Offensive Newcomer of the Year and Defensive Freshman of the Year, respectively. Shoutout to 1st Team All-Big 12 TE Charlie Kolar as well, who was a consistent force making 1st/2nd Team all-conference in each of his 4 seasons.
5th Quarter
Iowa State fans, what do you look back more fondly on, the Matt Campbell years with expectations of competing for a Big 12 title, or the Paul Rhoads years with a win over #2 Oklahoma State and some other fun upsets? Do you think Brock Purdy was always as good as he played for the 49ers in 2022, or is he mostly propped up by a stacked San Francisco offense? Who was better, Troy Davis or Breece Hall? Does David Montgomery take the 3rd spot or does that go to someone like Darren Davis/Alexander Robinson? Aside from going there, what makes someone choose to follow Iowa State? And how’d I do on your guys’ history?
If you appreciate the effort, please consider subscribing on substack! submitted by
jimbobbypaul to
CFB [link] [comments]
2023.06.02 17:59 SwannSwanchez Dev Server Datamine 2.26.0.25 -> 2.26.0.34 Part 3
2.26.0.25 -> 2.26.0.34 Part 3
Naval changes :
- New ship file : Lorraine
- Tons of coastal vehicles can now unlock (some of) their GE skins through gameplay
- Z 46 : Added funnels to the DM
- Ise :
- Charge storage HP increased
- Fire control room, auxiliary ammunition, fuel tank HP lowered
- Empty mass : 4250 -> 4000 t
- Moment of inertia changed
- Max speed : 45.36 -> 47.16 km/h
- Ka-Rō (all), Ke-I Kō, No. 1, No. 1 "Sakigake", No. 1 (T-1), No. 4, No. 10 (all), No. 13, No. 14, No. 36, No. 241 (T-38), No. 538 (T-14) (all), Se-Ha, MAS 551, MAS 561, MAS 569, MS 15, MS 53, MS 461, MS 472, MV 611, MV 473, Stefano Turr, VAS 201 : Removed two skins, added two others instead
- Bourrasque :
- Added 3 spawns
- Added a fire control room
- Added two more shell and charge storage
- Crew rearranged
- Empty mass : 2500 -> 2000 t
- Moment of inertia and center of gravity changed
- Acceleration slowed
- 130 mm cannons : Ammo : 160 -> 110 rpg
- 37 mm cannons : AA -> secondary
- Camera moved
- Ammo storage rearranged
- User skin generating enabled
- Chacal, Panthere :
- Empty mass : 3410 -> 3000 t
- Center of gravity changed
- Max rudder deflection 36 -> 35°
- 130 mm cannons : Ammo : 160 -> 110 rpg
- Camera moved
- Ammo storage rearranged
- Colbert :
- Fuel tank HP increased
- Removed a fuel tank
- Added coal bunkers
- 203 mm vertical limits : -10° / 90° -> -10° / 45°
- Duguay-Trouin :
- 155 mm cannons :
- Ammo : 125 -> 150 rpg
- Replenishment time : 5 -> 3.5 sec
- AA ammo storage rearranged
- Le Malin :
- 138.6 mm cannons : Front armor : 10 mm STS -> 5 mm RHA
- 20 mm cannons : Gun shield : 15 -> 12.7 mm
- Empty mass : 4510 -> 3800 t
- Moment of inertia and center of gravity changed
- Acceleration increased
- 138.6 mm cannons : Ammo : 100 -> 200 rpg
- Camera moved
- Ammo storage rearranged
- User skin generating enabled
- Leopard :
- Empty mass : 3410 -> 3000 t
- Center of gravity changed
- Max rudder deflection 36 -> 35°
- 130 mm cannons : Ammo : 160 -> 110 rpg
- Camera moved
- Sailors : UK -> FR
- Jeanne d'Arc :
- Fire control room HP lowered
- Removed a fuel tank
- Roof armor of forward ammo storage : 20 -> 6 mm
- Front and rear armor of forward ammo storage : 20 -> 12 mm
- Bridge elevator armor : 22 -> 20 mm
- Bridge floor : 30 -> 10 mm
- 20 mm cannons : Gun shield : 15 -> 12.7 mm
- Max speed : 50.08 -> 51.48 km/h
- 155 mm cannons :
- Ammo : 125 -> 150 rpg
- Replenishment time : 5 -> 3.5 sec
- 13.2 mm cannons : 13.2 mm/76 Type 93 -> 13.2 mm/76 Mle. 1929
- AA ammo storage rearranged
- Paris :
- Now rearms shells in batches
- DM and weapons changed from placeholder values to its unique ones
- Max speed : 44.1 -> 40.18 km/h
- Added modification and ammo storage data
- Primauguet :
- 155 mm cannons :
- Ammo : 125 -> 150 rpg
- Replenishment time : 5 -> 3.5 sec
- 13.2 mm cannons : 13.2 mm/76 Type 93 -> 13.2 mm/76 Mle. 1929
- AA ammo storage rearranged
- Vautour : 13.2 mm cannons : 13.2 mm/76 Type 93 -> 13.2 mm/76 Mle. 1929
Ground changes :
- All ground vehicles now have overheat damage (Including the trains)
- Overheat damage :
- Delay : 10 -> 20 sec
- Damage : 10 -> 5
- M1 (KVT) :
- Empty Mass : 54.2 -> 54.7 t
- Full Mass : 55.2 -> 55.7 t
- Inverted the Vismod modification's logic, now enabling the modification removes the add-ons
- M4 (T26) :
- 90 mm M3 : Ammo Count : 71 -> 76
- Added Ammo Storage data
- M60 AMBT, M1128 MGS (all), CM11 : Smoke grenades are now air-burst
- FlaRakRad 1 A2, Striker, Swingfire, 1221, AMX 13 (HOT), VCAC MEPHISTO : Maximum number of simultaneously guided missiles is now limited to 1
- RakJPz 2 (HOT) :
- Maximum number of simultaneously guided missiles is now limited to 1
- The launcher now always points 1.425° above the aiming circle
- 9P149M :
- Maximum number of simultaneously guided missiles is now limited to 1
- The launcher now always points 2.125° above the aiming circle
- Removed Aim Circle
- BMP-2M : The launcher now always points 1.125° above the aiming circle
- BTR-80A :
- Hull side rear : 5 mm RHA -> 6 mm RHAHH
- Added hull UFP as 6 mm RHAHH
- Added Crew Compartment Floor as 5 mm Structural Steel (there is another 8 mm RHAHH layer below it)
- 30 mm 2A72 : Recoil Offset : 0.045 -> 0.3
- Added Commander Sight
- Engine Max RPM : 2900 -> 2600 RPM
- Gearbox Changed : Max Speed in RB : [-11.8, 86.7] -> [-11.8, 87] km/h
- Added 30 mm APDS
- 30 mm magazine size : 250 -> 150
- Added Ammo Storage data
- Object 435 :
- New DM
- Hull UFP, Hull LFP, Hull rear, Hull roof at the rear are no longer volumetric
- Horizontal armor above the tracks : 5 mm RHA -> 4 mm Aluminium
- Turret : 100 -> 250 mm volumetric
- Cupola side armors are now volumetric
- Cupola hatches : 100 -> 30 mm
- Turret ring : 100 -> 20 mm
- Mantlet : 50 -> 40 mm
- 4 mm Structural steel elements are now 4 mm Aluminium
- Added a log and a track add-on armor to the rear
- Engine Sound : SU-100 -> T-64A
- Turret Turn Sound : Manual -> Servo
- 7.62 mm SGM : Vertical Limits : [-6, 17] -> +/- 0°
- 14.5 mm KPVT :
- Vertical limits between [-180, -78] : [-2, 60] -> between [-180, -83]° : [-5, 60]°
- Vertical limits between [-78, -50] : [25, 60] -> between [-83, -70]° : [13, 60]°
- Vertical limits between [-50, 180] -> between [-70, 180]°
- Gearbox Changed : Max Speed in RB : [-6.1, 40.2] -> [-8.3, 55.1] km/h
- Moved Camera
- Added Ammo Storage data
- Vickers Battle Tank Mk. 1 : Can no longer generate user skins
- Vijayanta :
- 105 mm Royal Ordnance L7A1 :
- Stock shell : L28A1 APDS -> M728 APDS
- Added L35 HESH and M456 HEAT-FS
- 12.7 mm M2 HB -> 7.62 mm L37A1 : Ammo Count : 600 -> 1000
- Added NVD Projector
- Can no longer generate user skins
- Skins removed
- ZT 3A2 : The launcher now always points 2.425° above the aiming circle
- Ho-Ro :
- 150 mm Type 38 : Ammo Count : 28 -> 24
- Ammo in the storage separated to single shells
- Type 87 RCV (P) :
- 20 mm MK 20 :
- Magazine Size : 200 -> 100
- Now stabilized
- Added 20 mm APDS
- Type 89 FV :
- Maximum number of simultaneously guided missiles is now limited to 1
- The launcher now always points 1.925° above the aiming circle
- AFT09 :
- Maximum number of simultaneously guided missiles is now limited to 1
- The launcher now always points 1.2° above the aiming circle
- ZTZ88 (all) : 12.7 mm roof MG vertical limits : -5° / 60° -> -4.5° / 82°
- ZTZ99A : Added the armor under the gunner's optic as 30 mm RHA
- Centauro (all) : Added a spall shield in the hull front as 5 mm RHA
- VBM Freccia C/C :
- Armor around the coaxial MG : 25 mm Aluminium alloy 7039 -> 6 mm RHA
- Armor around the exhaust : 8 -> 15 mm
- Hull LFP, Hull front lower cheek, Hull rear, Lower hull side composite at the chassis composites : 30 -> 40 mm
- Lower hull side armor at the first, second and fourth wheels : 30 mm Composite screen -> 8 mm RHAHH
- Internal armor around the breech : 6 mm RHAHH -> 40 mm volumetric Aluminium alloy 7039
- Turret ring, turret underside, Cylindrical armor around the breech : Aluminium alloy 5083 -> Aluminium alloy 7039
- Added a spall shield in the hull front as 8 mm RHA
- Added roof MG gun shield as 6 mm RHA
- Added a turret optic as 10 mm RHA
- Added an add-on armor on the hull LFP as 8 mm RHAHH
- Added an armor on the lower hull side at the third wheel as 40 mm Composite screen
- Added an add-on armor on the hull UFP as 40 mm Composite screen
- Added three boxes on the hull roof and hull rear as 5 mm Structural steel
- Transmission and loaded missiles can no longer be overpressured
- 25 mm Oerlikon KBA-B02 :
- Ammo Count : 440 -> 400
- Rear Vertical limits between +/- 150° : [-1, 60] -> between [146, -140]° : [-3, 60]°
- Spike : Static Elevation : 3 -> 2.25°
- Added Ammo Storage data
- Added target tracker
- VBC Centauro PT 2 : Added a spall shield in the hull front as 8 mm RHA
- AMX 30 AuF1 :
- Added the gun holder as 4 mm structural steel
- Tracks on the hull sides : 20 -> 10 mm
- VBCI 2 (MCT-30) :
- Finished Armor
- 7.62 mm L37A1 -> 12.7 mm M2 HB :
- Vertical Speed : 90 -> 70 °/s
- Vertical Limits : [-10, 50] -> [-20, 60]°
- Added 2 Plane Stabilizer
- Empty Mass : 15.48 -> 31 t
- Fuel Mass : 520 -> 1000 kg
- Full Mass : 16 -> 32 t
- Moved Center of Gravity
- Engine Horsepower : 280 -> 600 hp
- Max Brake Force : 63.2 -> 130 kN
- Gearbox Changed : Max Speed in RB : [-85.1, 85] -> [-36.5, 100.2] km/h
- Suspension Damping Force : 55 -> 140 kN
- Smoke Grenades : 76 - > 66 mm
- CV9030FIN :
- Added Commander Sight :
- Driver NVD :
- Gen 1 -> 2
- 800x600 -> 1200x800
- Light Multiplier : 5 -> 7
- Lvrbv 701, M113A2 (ASRAD-R) : The launcher now always points 0.75° above the aiming circle
- Sherman Mk. IVb (M3) : Added Ammo Storage data
- Magach 6 Bet Gal :
- Added Auto Sight Distance Correction
- Commander Sight : 132.6 mm CHA -> 12.7 mm RHA
- Gun Mask : No longer of Variable Thickness
- Added periscope to DM as 16 mm CHA
- Added commander sight
- Track Segments :
- Model : T97 -> T142
- Length : 0.176 -> 0.18 m
- Start Offset : 0.06 -> 0.04
- Width : 0.5 -> 0.55 m
- Sight Zoom : [8.01, 10.1] -> [6, 12]
- Sight Fov : 4.3 -> 5
- Moved Camera
- Detection Height : 2.97 -> 3.14
- Added Ammo Storage data
- Magach 6 Resh (Hydra 70) :
- 70 mm Hydra 70 : "Magazine" size : 19 -> 38
- Added ammo storage data for the rockets
Aircraft weapon changes :
- 75 mm Type 88 : AP-T can now overpressure
- 102 mm 102/35 Mod. 14 : AP-T can now overpressure
Bomb changes :
- AGM-62A :
- Length : 3.455 -> 3.4544 m
- Distance From CM to Stabilizer : 0.15 -> 0.5 m
- Wing Area Multiplier : 1.5 -> 2.175
- Guidance :
- Base IAS : 1300 -> 1800 m/s
- Max G-load : 5 -> 4
- PID proportional term : 0.1 -> 0.0821
- PID integral term : 0.05 -> 0.0971
- PID integral term limit : 0.85 -> 1
- PID derivative term : 0.1 -> 0.0004
- AGM-62A ER :
- Length : 3.455 -> 3.4544 m
- Distance From CM to Stabilizer : 0.15 -> 0.5 m
- Guidance :
- Base IAS : 1300 -> 1800 m/s
- Max G-load : 5 -> 4
- PID proportional term : 0.1 -> 0.0821
- PID integral term : 0.05 -> 0.0971
- PID integral term limit : 0.85 -> 1
- PID derivative term : 0.1 -> 0.0004
- GBU-8/B, GBU-15(V)1/B :
- Distance From CM to Stabilizer : 0.05 -> 0.5 m
- Drag Coef : 0.8 -> 1.15
- Fins AoA : 9 -> 13.5°
- Added Lifetime = 90 s
- Guidance :
- Base IAS : 1300 -> 1800 m/s
- Max G-load : 4.5 -> 4
- PID proportional term : 0.1 -> 0.0821
- PID integral term : 0.05 -> 0.0971
- PID derivative term : 0.1 -> 0.0004
- GBU-10/B :
- Calibre : 0.789 -> 0.4572 m
- Length : 4.38 -> 4.318 m
- Distance From CM to Stabilizer : 0.05 -> 0.5 m
- Drag Coef : 0.8 -> 1.17
- Guidance :
- Removed Inertial Navigation Drift Speed parameter
- Base IAS : 1300 -> 1800 m/s
- Max G-load : 3 -> 4
- PID proportional term : 0.1 -> 0.0996
- PID integral term : 0.1 -> 0.0536
- PID integral term limit : 0.75 -> 1
- PID derivative term : 0.1 -> 0.0001
- GBU-12/B :
- Calibre : 0.273 -> 0.2794 m
- Length : 3.33 -> 3.3274 m
- Distance From CM to Stabilizer : 0.05 -> 0.5 m
- Drag Coef : 0.8 -> 1.178
- Guidance :
- Removed Inertial Navigation Drift Speed parameter
- Base IAS : 1300 -> 1800 m/s
- Max G-load : 3 -> 4
- PID proportional term : 0.1 -> 0.0401
- PID integral term : 0.1 -> 0.1336
- PID integral term limit : 0.75 -> 1
- PID derivative term : 0.1 -> 0.0005
- GBU-16/B :
- Calibre : 0.356 -> 0.3556 m
- Length : 3.68 -> 3.683 m
- Distance From CM to Stabilizer : 0.05 -> 0.5 m
- Drag Coef : 0.8 -> 1.245
- Guidance :
- Removed Inertial Navigation Drift Speed parameter
- Base IAS : 1300 -> 1800 m/s
- Max G-load : 3 -> 4
- PID proportional term : 0.1 -> 0.0896
- PID integral term : 0.1 -> 0.0996
- PID integral term limit : 0.75 -> 1
- PID derivative term : 0.1 -> 0.0003
- GBU-24/B :
- Distance From CM to Stabilizer : 0.05 -> 0.5 m
- Drag Coef : 0.8 -> 1.15
- Fins AoA : 9 -> 13.5°
- Added Lifetime = 90 s
- Guidance :
- Removed Warmup Time, Working Time parameter
- No longer Uncaged Before Launch
- Removed Delay
- Added Loft Guidance
- Base IAS : 1300 -> 1800 m/s
- Max G-load : 3 -> 4
- PID proportional term : 0.1 -> 0.0996
- PID integral term : 0.1 -> 0.0626
- PID integral term limit : 0.5 -> 1
- PID derivative term : 0.1 -> 0.0001
- 100 kg FAB-100 (all), m/38 : Caliber : 0.273 -> 0.183 m
- 250 kg FAB-250 (all), m/30 : Caliber : 0.32 -> 0.22 m
- KAB-500L-F-E : PID derivative term : 0.0001 -> 0.0004
- LS500J :
- Distance From CM to Stabilizer : 0.05 -> 0.55 m
- Drag Coef : 0.8 -> 1.575
- Wing Area Multiplier : 1.8 -> 1.6
- Fins AoA : 13.5 -> 18°
- Guidance :
- Removed Inertial Navigation Drift Speed parameter
- Base IAS : 1300 -> 1800 m/s
- Max G-load : 3 -> 4
- PID proportional term : 0.1 -> 0.0676
- PID integral term : 0.1 -> 0.1101
- PID integral term limit : 0.75 -> 1
- PID derivative term : 0.1 -> 0.0004
- TS250 :
- Distance From CM to Stabilizer : 0.05 -> 0.55 m
- Drag Coef : 0.8 -> 1.625
- Wing Area Multiplier : 1.8 -> 1.5
- Lifetime : 60 -> 80 s
- Guidance :
- No longer Lock After Launch
- Now use Inertial Navigation
- Inertial Navigation Drift Speed : 3.5 -> 5
- Laser Seeker :
- FoV : 60 -> 30°
- Max Lock Angle before launch : 0 -> 35°
- Gimbal limit : 0 -> 35°
- Track Rate : 10000 -> 8 °/s
- Now triggers LWS
- Base IAS : 1300 -> 1800 m/s
- Max G-load : 3 -> 4
- PID proportional term : 0.1 -> 0.0351
- PID integral term : 0.1 -> 0.1446
- PID integral term limit : 0.75 -> 1
- PID derivative term : 0.1 -> 0.0005
- BGL-400 :
- Caliber : 0.789 -> 0.403 m
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.05 -> 0.5
- Drag Coef : 0.8 -> 1.75
- Guidance :
- Removed Inertial Navigation Drift Speed parameter
- Base IAS : 1300 -> 1800 m/s
- Max G-load : 3 -> 4
- PID proportional term : 0.1 -> 0.0996
- PID integral term : 0.1 -> 0.0981
- PID integral term limit : 0.75 -> 1
- PID derivative term : 0.1 -> 0.0001
- BGL-1000 :
- Caliber : 0.789 -> 0.4572 m
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.05 -> 0.5
- Drag Coef : 0.8 -> 1.75
- Guidance :
- Removed Inertial Navigation Drift Speed parameter
- Base IAS : 1300 -> 1800 m/s
- Max G-load : 3 -> 4
- PID proportional term : 0.1 -> 0.0996
- PID integral term : 0.1 -> 0.0316
- PID integral term limit : 0.75 -> 1
- PID derivative term : 0.1 -> 0.0001
- Mk. 13 (Paveway) (FR), Mk. 18 (Paveway) (FR) :
- Caliber : 0.789 -> 0.42 m
- Length : 3.4 -> 3.488 m
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.05 -> 0.5
- Drag Coef : 0.8 -> 1.15
- Guidance :
- Removed Inertial Navigation Drift Speed parameter
- Base IAS : 1300 -> 1800 m/s
- Max G-load : 3 -> 4
- PID proportional term : 0.1 -> 0.0766
- PID integral term : 0.1 -> 0.1996
- PID integral term limit : 0.75 -> 1
- PID derivative term : 0.1 -> 0.0001
Air missile changes :
- New missile : copy-paste 9M127 with a 5° launch sector instead of 4° for helis we erroneously called 9M127-1 at the aircraft changes due to the internal name being su_9m127_1
- AGM-22, AS.11, Rb 52 :
- Drag Coef : 2.57 -> 2.15
- Wing Area Multiplier : 2.8 -> 2.35
- Added Fins AoA = 0°
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.01 -> 0.005
- Mass After Sustainer Burn : 24.45 -> 24.2 kg
- Sustainer Burn Time : 20 -> 17.5 s
- Booster Force : 3280 -> 3200 N
- Sustainer Force : 390 -> 470 N
- Lifetime : 21 -> 18.5 s
- Added Booster Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.005°
- Added Sustainer Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.05°
- Max angle between the missile and cursor where it remains under control = 1°
- Statcard Max Speed : 190 -> 220 m/s
- Minimum Distance : 30 -> 100 m
- New guidance code
- AS.34 : Guidance :
- Loft Elevation : 7 -> 5°
- Loft Target Elevation : -10 -> -5°
- PID proportional term : 0.012 -> 0.0295
- PID integral term : 0.0001 -> 0.0225
- PID derivative term : 0.0005 -> 0.0058
- PARS 3 LR :
- Drag Coef : 2 -> 1.75
- Wing Area Multiplier : 1.15 -> 1.5
- Fins AoA : 16.2 -> 18°
- Mass After Booster Burn : 32 -> 43 kg
- Booster Burn Time : 4 -> 3 s
- Booster Force : 4.5 -> 4.6 kN
- Added a Sustainer
- Lifetime : 30 -> 35 s
- Guidance :
- Loft Elevation : 5 -> 10°
- Loft Target Elevation : -10 -> -25°
- Loft Angle To Acceleration Multiplier : 10 -> 1.5
- Loft Max Target Omega : 2 -> 0.85
- Base IAS : 1200 -> 1800 m/s
- PID proportional term : 5 -> 0.0161
- PID integral term : 0.5 -> 0.0426
- PID derivative term : 0.5 -> 1
- PID integral term limit : 0.5 -> 0.0045
- HEAT damage : Range : 7.5 -> 9.5 m
- 9M14 (all) :
- Wing Area Multiplier : 1.5 -> 2.5
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.01 -> 0.005 m
- Added Fins AoA = 0°
- Added Booster Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.006°
- Added Sustainer Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.2°
- Max angle between the missile and cursor where it remains under control = 1°
- Shrapnel changes :
- Between 0° - 5° :
- Shrapnel radius and damage increased
- Shrapnel amount lowered
- Between 6° - 29° and 330° - 359° : Shrapnel amount lowered
- New Guidance Code
- 9M17 (all) :
- Length : 1.16 -> 1.165 m
- Drag Coef : 2.36 -> 2.3
- Wing Area Multiplier : 2.8 -> 2.75
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.01 -> 0.05 m
- Added Fins AoA = 13.5°
- Mass After Booster Burn : 28.09 -> 28.15 kg
- Mass After Sustainer Burn : 27.1 -> 26.25 kg
- Booster Force : 6933 -> 6840 N
- Lifetime : 37 -> 28 s
- Max Launch Angle : 20 -> 3°
- Max angle between the missile and cursor where it remains under control : 10 -> 2.5°
- New Guidance Code
- 9M114 :
- Wing Area Multiplier : 1.05 -> 1.1
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.005 -> 0.05 m
- Added Fins AoA = 9°
- Added Launch Delay = 0.05 s
- Max Launch Angle : 20 -> 3°
- Max angle between missile and cursor : 10 -> 2.5°
- New Guidance Code
- 9M120 (all) :
- Wing Area Multiplier : 1.05 -> 1.1
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.005 -> 0.05 m
- Added Fins AoA = 9°
- Added Launch Delay = 0.05 s
- Added Max Launch Angle = 3°
- Max angle between missile and cursor : 10 -> 2.5°
- New Guidance Code
- 9M123 :
- Drag Coef : 1.65 -> 1.85
- Wing Area Multiplier : 1.05 -> 1.1
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.005 -> 0.05 m
- Added Fins AoA = 9°
- Mass After Sustainer Burn : 31.3 -> 30 kg
- Sustainer Burn Time : 3 -> 6 s
- Sustainer Force : 2270 -> 2365 N
- Added Launch Delay = 0.05 s
- Lifetime : 25 -> 20 s
- Removed Max Launch Angle
- Max angle between missile and cursor : 10 -> 1°
- New Guidance Code
- 9M127 : Guidance :
- Removed Max Launch Angle
- Added Launch Sector = 4°
- Control Cone FoV : 15 -> 20°
- Delay : 0 -> 0.28 s
- 9M133 :
- Drag Coef : 2.3 -> 1.8
- Wing Area Multiplier : 2.1 -> 2.3
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.005 -> 0.03 m
- Added Fins AoA = 11.25°
- Mass After Booster Burn : 23.38 -> 23.2 kg
- Sustainer Burn Time : 29 -> 9 s
- Booster Force : 5760 -> 5880 N
- Sustainer Force : 290 -> 525 N
- Added Launch Delay = 0.1 s
- Lifetime : 50 -> 40 s
- Max angle between missile and cursor : 10 -> 2.5°
- Statcard Max Speed : 300 -> 320 m/s
- New Guidance Code
- 9M133FM :
- Length : 1.15 -> 1.21 m
- Drag Coef : 2.3 -> 1.8
- Wing Area Multiplier : 2.1 -> 2.3
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.005 -> 0.03 m
- Added Fins AoA = 11.25°
- Mass After Booster Burn : 24.68 -> 24.7 kg
- Booster Force : 6750 -> 6850 N
- Sustainer Force : 407 -> 475 N
- Added Launch Delay = 0.1 s
- Lifetime : 60 -> 40 s
- Max angle between missile and cursor : 10 -> 2.5°
- New Guidance Code
- Kh-25ML : Now has a tracer in its tail
- Kh-29L : Statcard Launch Distance : 8 -> 13 km
- S-25L : Guidance :
- Laser Seeker : Range : 7000 -> 10000 m
- Delay : 0.8 -> 0.5 s
- Added Loft Enabled = True
- Added Loft Elevation = 5°
- Added Loft Target Elevation = -35°
- Added Loft Angle To Acceleration Multiplier = 0.2
- Added Loft Max Target Omega = 0.75
- Added Proportional Navigation Multiplier = 4
- Base IAS : 1300 -> 1800 m/s
- Max G-load : 6 -> 8
- PID proportional term : 5 -> 0.0035
- PID integral term : 0.7 -> 0.058
- PID derivative term : 0.5 -> 0.0016
- PID integral term limit : 0.5 -> 1
- S-25LD : Guidance :
- Delay : 0.8 -> 0.5 s
- Added Loft Enabled = True
- Added Loft Elevation = 5°
- Added Loft Target Elevation = -35°
- Added Loft Angle To Acceleration Multiplier = 0.2
- Added Loft Max Target Omega = 0.75
- Added Proportional Navigation Multiplier = 4
- Base IAS : 1300 -> 1800 m/s
- Max G-load : 6 -> 8
- PID proportional term : 5 -> 0.0035
- PID integral term : 0.7 -> 0.058
- PID derivative term : 0.5 -> 0.0016
- PID integral term limit : 0.5 -> 1
- Starstreak :
- Length : 1.08 -> 1.4 m
- Drag Coef : 1.5 -> 2
- Booster Burn Time : 0.07 -> 0 s
- Sustainer Burn Time : 0.33 -> 0.43 s
- Booster Force : 28570 -> 0 N
- Sustainer Force : 34150 -> 29674 N
- Added Launch Delay = 0.07 s
- Start Speed : 10 -> 142 m/s
- Max Launch Angle : 3 -> 5°
- Max angle between missile and cursor : 8 -> 10°
- Added Fuse Delay = 0.5 m
- Darts :
- Separation Time : 0.6 -> 0.5 s
- Caliber : 20 -> 22 mm
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.001 -> 0.01 m
- Kinetic Damage Multiplier : 400 -> 200
- Length : 0.68 -> 0.45 m
- Max Axis Values : 2.75 -> 1.5
- Max Distance : 9800 -> 7000 m
- Lifetime : 10 -> 11 s
- HJ8A :
- Length : 0.68 -> 0.85 m
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.01 -> 0.005 m
- Added Fins AoA = 0°
- Mass After Booster Burn : 9.05 -> 10.05 kg
- Added Mass After Sustainer Burn = 8.75 kg
- Booster Burn Time : 16 -> 2 s
- Added Sustainer Burn Time = 13 s
- Booster Force : 268.75 -> 800 N
- Added Sustainer Force = 205 N
- Lifetime : 16 -> 15 s
- Added Booster Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.013°
- Added Sustainer Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.05°
- Removed Max Launch Angle
- Added Max angle between missile and cursor = 1°
- Statcard Max Speed : 250 -> 220 m/s
- New Guidance Code
- HJ8C :
- Visual Model : HJ8A -> HJ8C
- Length : 0.68 -> 1.05 m
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.01 -> 0.005 m
- Added Fins AoA = 0°
- Mass After Booster Burn : 9.25 -> 10.25 kg
- Added Mass After Sustainer Burn = 8.95 kg
- Booster Burn Time : 16 -> 2 s
- Added Sustainer Burn Time = 13 s
- Booster Force : 268.75 -> 800 N
- Added Sustainer Force = 205 N
- Lifetime : 16 -> 15 s
- Added Booster Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.013°
- Added Sustainer Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.05°
- Removed Max Launch Angle
- Added Max angle between missile and cursor = 1°
- Statcard Max Speed : 250 -> 220 m/s
- New Guidance Code
- HJ8E :
- Visual Model : HJ8A -> HJ8E
- Length : 0.68 -> 1.05 m
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.01 -> 0.005 m
- Added Fins AoA = 0°
- Mass After Booster Burn : 9.45 -> 10.85 kg
- Added Mass After Sustainer Burn = 9.55 kg
- Booster Burn Time : 20 -> 2 s
- Added Sustainer Burn Time = 17 s
- Booster Force : 267.75 -> 800 N
- Added Sustainer Force = 255 N
- Lifetime : 20 -> 19 s
- Added Booster Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.013°
- Added Sustainer Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.05°
- Removed Max Launch Angle
- Added Max angle between missile and cursor = 1°
- Statcard Max Speed : 260 -> 240 m/s
- New Guidance Code
- HJ8H :
- Visual Model : HJ8A -> HJ8H
- Length : 0.68 -> 1.05 m
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.01 -> 0.005 m
- Added Fins AoA = 0°
- Mass After Booster Burn : 10.25 -> 11.85 kg
- Added Mass After Sustainer Burn = 10.55 kg
- Booster Burn Time : 20 -> 2 s
- Added Sustainer Burn Time = 17 s
- Booster Force : 288.75 -> 800 N
- Added Sustainer Force = 255 N
- Lifetime : 20 -> 19 s
- Added Booster Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.013°
- Added Sustainer Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.05°
- Removed Max Launch Angle
- Added Max angle between missile and cursor = 1°
- Statcard Max Speed : 260 -> 240 m/s
- New Guidance Code
- HJ8L :
- Visual Model : HJ8A -> HJ8L
- Length : 0.68 -> 1.05 m
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.01 -> 0.005 m
- Added Fins AoA = 0°
- Mass After Booster Burn : 10.25 -> 11.85 kg
- Added Mass After Sustainer Burn = 10.55 kg
- Booster Burn Time : 20 -> 2 s
- Added Sustainer Burn Time = 17 s
- Booster Force : 288.75 -> 800 N
- Added Sustainer Force = 255 N
- Lifetime : 20 -> 19 s
- Added Booster Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.013°
- Added Sustainer Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.05°
- Removed Max Launch Angle
- Added Max angle between missile and cursor = 1°
- Statcard Max Speed : 260 -> 240 m/s
- New Guidance Code
- HJ9 (AFT09) :
- Caliber : 0.155 -> 0.152 m
- Length : 2.04 -> 1.5 m
- Drag Coef : 2 -> 1.75
- Wing Area Multiplier : 1.05 -> 1.95
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.005 -> 0.03 m
- Added Fins AoA = 11.25°
- Mass After Booster Burn : 21 -> 25 kg
- Added Mass After Sustainer Burn = 23.5 kg
- Booster Burn Time : 5 -> 1 s
- Added Sustainer Burn Time = 11 s
- Booster Force : 3780 -> 6450 N
- Added Sustainer Force = 390 N
- Added Launch Delay = 0.1 s
- Start Speed : 70 -> 75 m/s
- Removed Max Speed
- Max angle between missile and cursor : 10 -> 2.5°
- Removed Statcard Max Speed
- New Guidance Code
- AS.30L :
- Added Wing Area Multiplier = 1.15
- Lifetime : 22 -> 21 s
- Guidance :
- Added Proportional Navigation Multiplier = 4
- PID proportional term : 5 -> 0.0395
- PID integral term : 0.7 -> 0.0345
- PID derivative term : 0.5 -> 0.0061
- PID integral term limit : 0.5 -> 1
- HOT-1 :
- Drag Coef : 1.85 -> 2.01
- Wing Area Multiplier : 1.7 -> 2.25
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.01 -> 0.005 m
- Added Fins AoA = 0°
- Booster Burn Time : 1.1 -> 1 s
- Sustainer Burn Time : 17 -> 18 s
- Booster Force : 4600 -> 4965 N
- Sustainer Force : 265 -> 290 N
- Lifetime : 20 -> 19 s
- Added Booster Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.0029°
- Added Sustainer Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.05°
- Removed Max Launch Angle
- Max angle between missile and cursor : 10 -> 1°
- Removed Statcard Max Speed
- New Guidance Code
- HOT-2 :
- Drag Coef : 1.525 -> 1.625
- Wing Area Multiplier : 1.7 -> 2.25
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.01 -> 0.005 m
- Added Fins AoA = 0°
- Booster Burn Time : 1.1 -> 1 s
- Sustainer Burn Time : 17 -> 18 s
- Booster Force : 4600 -> 4965 N
- Sustainer Force : 265 -> 290 N
- Lifetime : 20 -> 19 s
- Added Booster Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.0029°
- Added Sustainer Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.05°
- Removed Max Launch Angle
- Max angle between missile and cursor : 10 -> 1°
- Removed Statcard Max Speed
- New Guidance Code
- HOT-3 :
- Drag Coef : 1.525 -> 2.01
- Wing Area Multiplier : 1.7 -> 2.25
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.01 -> 0.005 m
- Added Fins AoA = 0°
- Booster Force : 4600 -> 4965 N
- Sustainer Force : 265 -> 290 N
- Lifetime : 20 -> 19 s
- Added Booster Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.0029°
- Added Sustainer Thrust Vectoring Angle = 0.05°
- Max Distance : 4300 -> 4000 m
- Removed Max Launch Angle
- Max angle between missile and cursor : 10 -> 1°
- Removed Statcard Max Speed
- Guidance Range : 4300 -> 4000 m
- New Guidance Code
- Rb 53 :
- Wing Area Multiplier : 2.8 -> 3.5
- Distance From CM to Stabilizers : 0.01 -> 0.025 m
- Added Fins AoA = 13.5°
- Booster Force : 1100 -> 1050 N
- Added Max angle between missile and cursor = 1°
- New Guidance Code
Current Dev version : 2.26.0.40
Current Dev-Stable version : 2.25.1.135
Current Live version : 2.25.1.135
submitted by
SwannSwanchez to
Warthunder [link] [comments]
2023.06.02 15:17 IndieFlea End of Month Minor League updates - IndieFlea's Mid-Season Prospect Rankings (Part 2)
Hey all, this is Part 2 of my Mid-Season Prospect Rankings.
Part 1 is here. Obviously within one day my list had to be messed up with Vanasco being traded after his DFA. For the sake of ease, I’m putting Luis Valdez at #50, and pushing everyone else down one spot up to where I had Vanasco.
Again all stats are as of May 31 unless noted.
Rankings 40-2639-26 - 39 – Marcos Torres (prev. 39) - a 19 year old outfielder in last year’s International FA class, he’s put together an .858 OPS in 218 plate appearances in 53 DSL games. He’s this high due to scouting reports and age, but I’m likely not going to move much until he’s laying stateside or in Down East.
- 38 – Tommy Specht (prev. 43) - just made his debut at Down East this week. At age 18 the 2022 6th rounder has a 1.055 OPS so far in 3 games including yesterday. Very small sample size, but may bring life to this anemic Down East offense.
- 37 – Ian Moller (prev. 37) - Ian is repeating Down East after a lukewarm 2022, and continues to be mediocre offensively, the 2021 4th rounder spouting a .610 OPS in 32 games including yesterday. While he gets on at a decent clip (19 walks in 131 PAs), he strikes out a ton. He’s still defensively very good, and is currently the top catching prospect in the organization (I don’t count Huff anymore), but if he can’t improve his contact rate, he’ll fall behind Cody Freeman fairly soon in the rankings.
- 36 - Jose Corniell (prev. 48) – Jose is only 19, the same age as Brock Porter (and they both turn 20 this month), but looks really good repeating Down East so far. In 32.1 innings he has a 2.78 ERA, 42 strikeouts, and only 10 walks. I believe he’s Rule 5 eligible after 24, so I hope he can get through DE and Hickory by then. Corniell was acquired in the Rafael Montero trade with Seattle in 2020.
- 35 – Winston Santos (prev. 40) - the 21 year old from the 2019 International FA class has had a very mild year in Hickory: 5.20 ERA in 7 starts, 27 Ks in 36.1 innings, 8 homers given up. Scouting has his fastball with some of the best movement (not necessarily velocity) in the organization, but not sure if that has translated so far this year. Hope his numbers stabilize through the rest of this year, otherwise I’ll have to drop him in the rankings. He only rose due to some graduations and Vanasco being DFA'd.
- 34 – Trevor Hauver (prev. 35) - the last piece in the Joey Gallo trade, which I can’t justify ranking him any lower or any higher. He’s does things just okay. He’s a decent corner outfielder and can also play 1B in Frisco, but not exceptional at any position. He has a .745 OPS, a decent walk rate but also strikes out a lot. He could be a trade piece, or he can fall into org filler status. I’m kind a neutral on him, but for a last piece in a trade with the Yankees, I really can’t complain.
- 33 – Cam Cauley (prev. 36) The 2021 3rd rounder is repeating Down East after a dreadful 2022, and slowly has improved. 21 hits in 20 games in May (.808 OPS) Has gotten his OPS for the year to .697. He’s only 20 so there’s still a lot of room to grow, although he’s playing a position that will be blocked at the major league league for quite a while.
- 32 – Yosy Galan (prev. 38) - An outfielder who I think was undrafted in 2020 (MILB doesn’t say he was part of an international FA class), Galan is sporting a .769 OPS repeating Down East, (.868 OPS if you take out his awful first two weeks of the season). He strikeout at a higher (but manageable rate), but can still get on base via walk. Don’t think his defense is anything to write home about, and he’s already 22 (on the old side for Down East), but he's been pretty solid. Wouldn’t hate to see him up in Hickory soon.
- (Original) 32 – Ricky Vanasco (prev. 29) - I fear I am a Ricky Vanasco hater; he’s been overrated by this system for years. The 15th rounder from the 2017 draft had an amazing year with Spokane and Hickory in 2019, lost 2020 to COVID and 2021 to injury, and has been underwhelming (and injured) ever since. He was added to the 40-man last year and was pretty mid for Hickory and Frisco (48 ER and 52 walks over 92.1 innings, although 118 Ks are good). This year he started his second option year injured (again), has recently come back to the Frisco rotation, and has been bad (6 earned runs, 4 walks, and 2 HBP over 2.1 innings in 2 starts). He was just DFA’d for Grant Anderson,
although I don’t see him being claimed by anybody. If he clears and gets sent back to Frisco I’m fine with that, but with the start he’s had, I’m going to continue dropping him in the rankings unless he gets converted to a reliever LOL HE GONE. Back when I started my personal rankings I think I had him as high as 11. Now he’s out of the Top 30. Just kinda goes to show only ONE great year doesn’t make a prospect.
- 31 – Alejandro Osuna (prev. 33) - Roberto’s younger brother was signed in the 2020 abridged International FA class, and has been good, not great. Sports a .789 OPS on a Hickory team starved for offense. He’s a pretty decent base stealer and average at all three outfield positions. I could see a future of him being a decent platoon player, but nothing really being amazing.
- 30 – Sebastian Walcott (previously 30) - I can’t really rank guys who were just signed in the 2023 International FA class since they haven’t logged stats, its purely on scouting. Walcott being a 17 year old shortstop and his high pedigree is the reason he’s here, even if he’s ranked higher in other publications. Let’s see some DSL action or even stick him in Down East.
- 29 – Blaine Crim (prev. 31) - The 19th rounder from 2019 stays in the rankings purely on his hitting, with a .759 OPS in Round Rock this year (although his May wasn’t good). His issue is age (turning 26 this month) and his very big defensive liability. Scouts have said his first base isn’t good enough to play in the majors, but he’s also not hitting enough to be an every day DH. He’s likely the first guy to turn to if Garver or Lowe were to be lost for the season, but I’m not holding my breath on Crim being anything more than replacement level. But the floor is also there.
- 28 – Chase Lee (prev. 34) - Chase was a 6th rounder in 2021 and has vaulted up the minors pretty quickly, being a college pitcher. He’s had decent success at every level he’s pitched, culminating in 39 Ks in 29.2 relief innings in Round Rock this year so far including yesterday. Walk rate’s a little higher than you’d like, but you can’t complain too much about a guy with his delivery. He could be an option for the pen this year, although don’t expect him in leverage situations.
- 27 – Larson Kindreich (prev. 27) - Larson was an 8th rounder from 2021, and had a pretty good 2022 splitting time between Down East and Hickory. So far this year he’s just been okay (5.13 ERA, but 27 Ks in 26.1 innings). He’s turning 24 this month (which is a bit old for Hickory), so needs to step up a bit if he wants stay in the Top 30.
- 26 – Danyer Cueva (prev. 28) - The infielder was part of the 2021 international FA class and made his Down East debut late last year. This year has a .615 OPS for the Wood Ducks, which is pretty par for the course of the other batters on the team. His age (just turned 19) and defensive capabilities keeps him high on this list.
That’s it for Part 2! I’ll get Part 3 (Rankings 25-11) up tomorrow. Hopefully no one else gets traded by then.
Thanks for reading!
submitted by
IndieFlea to
TexasRangers [link] [comments]
2023.06.01 22:33 surroundedbywolves [iOS][2023.20.0] Things I’m going to miss about Apollo, or a partial list of features I wish Reddit on iOS had before they force every off their beloved third party apps
Some background first: I’ve been a redditor for over 10 years pretty much exclusively on mobile. Started with main Reddit app, switched to Alien Blue, switched back to Reddit after they bought AB, then switched to Apollo and only kept Reddit around for weird edge cases. Third party apps getting killed July 1 might make me quit using Reddit on mobile, if not overall.
I’ve worked in mobile dev for almost that whole 10 years and am well aware of what it takes to build and maintain a big, complicated mobile app with lots of users and, though I have blind spots, have a legitimate list of complaints about Reddit on iOS that are largely highlighted here in this list of things that Apollo does better than Reddit for iOS (if the latter does them at all)
Here’s that list:
- Highlighting new accounts with how long since they were created
- Highlighting a post that’s had new comments since you viewed it (along with a count of those new comments)
- Option to mark posts as read and hide on scroll (like Alien Blue used to do iirc)
- Option to upvote posts on save
- Remembering comment and post sorts by subreddit along with ignoring default comment sort
- Sharing posts and comments as images
- Option to collapse automod comments
- A comment jump button with a toggle to turn it on and off that actually works
- Option to blocked users
- Option to always use reader mode
- Doesn’t log your opened websites in ScreenTime (in case you don’t know, Reddit adds all the NSFW sites you open to your iOS ScreenTime log if you use their in-app browser)
- Option to exclude your subscribed subs from all and popular so those become fresh views instead of the same list of posts as your Home feed
- Way better notification settings, including filtered notifications for specific ed subreddits (like title keywords)
- No notifications about your comments getting 25, 50, whatever upvotes
- Filtered keywords and subreddits
- Rich configurable gestures to do things like upvote, downvote, or save with a swipe on your feed
- Swiping back to your feed always goes back, instead of Reddit dismissing the image with an awkward gesture
- Swipe from the right to go back to the post you were viewing before you went back to your feed
- Link icon on top of image preview that will open a link, where Reddit just puts an image but is actually a website or article so you tap the image and (surprise) it opens the browser
- No ““ before every post’s subreddit attribution on your feed
- Subreddit autocomplete in posts and comments when starting with
- More and better themes
- Control over post size (card or compact) including by subreddit
- Toggle subreddit icons off
- Tap the top toolbar to jump to subreddits instead of going through search and having to wade through all the results
- Tap the status bar to go back to the top (like the iOS native functionality) and tap it again to go back to where you were
- Option to toggle flairs and awards on or off
- A communicative dev that cares and an app that is regularly featured in the App Store
- Way better customizable app icons including community submissions and professional artists
- Much better comment and post text formatting tools, including Unicode faces and sponge text (Reddit on iOS has no toolbar and doesnt even render the formatting until you submit the text…)
- Indication on the feed that an image post is an album and showing if a post is a GIF vs a video
- Categories for saved posts and comments
- Feels much more like a native iOS app overall
- Searching in comments is much more useful, highlights search term, doesn’t hide all comments, and includes hits from the post text
- Swipe horizontally to scrub videos, like native iOS video player without destroying the swipe away dismiss gesture
- Access to sorting the feed on the feed with a single tap, and sorting method is visible (as opposed to completely mysterious on Reddit for iOS)
- Way more preferences and customizability
- Profiles always losd their posts and comments, where Reddit on iOS won’t load profile posts what seems like half the time
- You can long press links in text posts and comments to preview (like standard iOS) and copy them to your clipboard
- Shows that a post has been edited and when
- Hidden posts actually hide from your feed
- The video player isn’t trash
- You can download videos straight from the player
- Playback speed control
- Ability to share just a link to the media
- Post links are copied without all the UTM nonsense
- Upvote/downvote percentage is shown next to the karma on posts
- Apollo shows all my posts while Reddit doesn’t??? This post with 770 karma and 323 comments from two weeks ago appears to be missing from my profile on Reddit for iOS but def appears on my profile in Apollo (turns out this is because I somehow hid the post, so Reddit decided that meant I wanted to not hide it from my feed but hide my own post on my own profile. On top of that, Apollo was the only way I could unhide it on mobile because Reddit doesn’t think to include hide/unhide in the context menus on your own posts)
- List views like saved, history, upvoted, hidden, etc are searchable
- Apollo’s tab bar is always around (like most iOS apps) so you can get to your inbox, search, profile, or settings from almost any view
- User autocomplete in posts and comments after typing ““
- Able to long press on posts and open a view where you can select blocks of text
- Search results show whether you’ve viewed/hidden or upvoted/downvoted the post. On Reddit for iOS they just appear completely without indicators as neutral search results. No way to tell if I’ve viewed or interacted with any of the results.
- Long press options on tons of stuff. Again, like native iOS
- Tap to collapse post and bring up comments
- Tweets have a Twitter logo over their image preview, so you know you’re opening a tweet. Where, like above, Reddit only shows an image so you have to guess what happens before you tap it.
- Upvote/downvote and reply to replies from the inbox list view
- Link preview at the bottom of a comment — complete and total rickroll prevention
- Formatting, like italics and bold, are shown in inbox and profile views where Reddit shows plain text until you view the text in context.
- Can hide and unhide you own posts — I had an issue where my own posts were missing from my profile and apparently Reddit doesn’t include that in their post context menus (in the … icon)
- Your own edited posts appear edited immediately after a successful save where Reddit some times won’t show the new version after save or even after pull to refresh
- Generally far more stable and less battery draw
- Most video and GIF posts can be upvoted or downvoted (along with access to comments button, share, and context menu for things like downloading the video or accessing the source sub or OP’s profile) during playback, without having to dismiss the media viewer
- Collapse comments still show if you upvoted or downvoted them, where Reddit just shows the total karma with no indication that you voted on it.
- TikTok link image thumbnails contain the link indicator, since they open in the browser because TT won’t let you play them any other way; where Reddit shows a play icon on the thumbnail implying it’s like any other video, but then launches the browser anyway (this is similar to others above but is worse because the play icon is a liar)
- You’re able to favorite subs without joining them, adding them like bookmarks to the leftmost view along with your multis and subs you’ve joined in alpha order
- Random subreddit button on initial search view, kinda like Wikipedia’s random functionality
- Feed shows usernames. Reddit removed those from the feed and I’ll never understand why
- Award notifications appear in your inbox while, as far as I can tell, there’s no record of it happening on Reddit for iOS
- I never, ever have trouble hitting the upvote button (or using the swipe) on Apollo, but I swear that touch target gets smaller every time Reddit updates their app
- The current size of Apollo’s cache (maxed at 200 MB) is shown in settings along with a way to clear it while Reddit only shows a way to “clear local history” and no mention of how much it’s caching on your phone (that I can find)
- Crossposted videos open the right video. This might be part of Reddit’s epic struggle against video players, but posts like this open what seems to be the top post on the original sub instead of the correct post when you tap any part of the crossposted preview including both the thumbnail of the correct video and the comments label. Bonus: On Apollo, you can just watch the video from the crosspost instead of having to open the original to view it
- You can select text from the comment to which you’re replying while writing your reply for things like quoting the text where Reddit only allows you to collapse the parent comment
- Apollo offers a way to upload images to Imgur when pasting them from your clipboard, along with being able to upload from your camera roll
- I don’t get errors saving edits to this post
But it’s missing chat!!! (While still supporting messaging)
PS. This ordered list looks much better in Apollo
PPS. Whoops a typo in the title: * force
everyone off their beloved third party apps
submitted by
surroundedbywolves to
redditmobile [link] [comments]
2023.06.01 21:28 Boring-Forever-5839 Minecraft forge mod loading error. I'm very confused on why this wont work. can somebody tell me how to fix it?
---- Minecraft Crash Report ----
// I bet Cylons wouldn't have this problem.
Time: 2023-06-01 14:16:54
Description: Mod loading error has occurred
java.lang.Exception: Mod Loading has failed
at net.minecraftforge.logging.CrashReportExtender.dumpModLoadingCrashReport([CrashReportExtender.java:55](https://CrashReportExtender.java:55)) \~\[forge-1.19.3-44.1.23-universal.jar%23325!/:?\] {re:classloading} at net.minecraftforge.client.loading.ClientModLoader.completeModLoading([ClientModLoader.java:167](https://ClientModLoader.java:167)) \~\[forge-1.19.3-44.1.23-universal.jar%23325!/:?\] {re:classloading,pl:runtimedistcleaner:A} at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.lambda$new$2([Minecraft.java:588](https://Minecraft.java:588)) \~\[client-1.19.3-20221207.122022-srg.jar%23320!/:?\] {re:mixin,pl:accesstransformer:B,xf:fml:xaeroworldmap:xaero\_wm\_minecraft\_runtick,pl:runtimedistcleaner:A,re:classloading,pl:accesstransformer:B,xf:fml:xaeroworldmap:xaero\_wm\_minecraft\_runtick,pl:mixin:APP:bookshelf.common.mixins.json:client.AccessorMinecraft,pl:mixin:APP:balm.mixins.json:MinecraftMixin,pl:mixin:APP:carryon.mixins.json:MinecraftMixin,pl:mixin:APP:bettercombat.mixins.json:client.MinecraftClientAccessor,pl:mixin:APP:bettercombat.mixins.json:client.MinecraftClientInject,pl:mixin:APP:iceberg.mixins.json:MinecraftMixin,pl:mixin:APP:architectury.mixins.json:MixinMinecraft,pl:mixin:APP:biomemusic.mixins.json:ClientMusicChoiceMixin,pl:mixin:A,pl:runtimedistcleaner:A} at net.minecraft.Util.m\_137521\_([Util.java:432](https://Util.java:432)) \~\[client-1.19.3-20221207.122022-srg.jar%23320!/:?\] {re:mixin,re:classloading,pl:mixin:APP:bettermineshafts.mixins.json:SuppressLogMixin,pl:mixin:A} at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.lambda$new$3([Minecraft.java:582](https://Minecraft.java:582)) \~\[client-1.19.3-20221207.122022-srg.jar%23320!/:?\] {re:mixin,pl:accesstransformer:B,xf:fml:xaeroworldmap:xaero\_wm\_minecraft\_runtick,pl:runtimedistcleaner:A,re:classloading,pl:accesstransformer:B,xf:fml:xaeroworldmap:xaero\_wm\_minecraft\_runtick,pl:mixin:APP:bookshelf.common.mixins.json:client.AccessorMinecraft,pl:mixin:APP:balm.mixins.json:MinecraftMixin,pl:mixin:APP:carryon.mixins.json:MinecraftMixin,pl:mixin:APP:bettercombat.mixins.json:client.MinecraftClientAccessor,pl:mixin:APP:bettercombat.mixins.json:client.MinecraftClientInject,pl:mixin:APP:iceberg.mixins.json:MinecraftMixin,pl:mixin:APP:architectury.mixins.json:MixinMinecraft,pl:mixin:APP:biomemusic.mixins.json:ClientMusicChoiceMixin,pl:mixin:A,pl:runtimedistcleaner:A} at net.minecraft.client.gui.screens.LoadingOverlay.m\_86412\_([LoadingOverlay.java:137](https://LoadingOverlay.java:137)) \~\[client-1.19.3-20221207.122022-srg.jar%23320!/:?\] {re:classloading,pl:runtimedistcleaner:A} at net.minecraft.client.renderer.GameRenderer.m\_109093\_([GameRenderer.java:920](https://GameRenderer.java:920)) \~\[client-1.19.3-20221207.122022-srg.jar%23320!/:?\] {re:mixin,pl:accesstransformer:B,pl:runtimedistcleaner:A,re:classloading,pl:accesstransformer:B,pl:mixin:A,pl:runtimedistcleaner:A} at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.m\_91383\_([Minecraft.java:1135](https://Minecraft.java:1135)) \~\[client-1.19.3-20221207.122022-srg.jar%23320!/:?\] {re:mixin,pl:accesstransformer:B,xf:fml:xaeroworldmap:xaero\_wm\_minecraft\_runtick,pl:runtimedistcleaner:A,re:classloading,pl:accesstransformer:B,xf:fml:xaeroworldmap:xaero\_wm\_minecraft\_runtick,pl:mixin:APP:bookshelf.common.mixins.json:client.AccessorMinecraft,pl:mixin:APP:balm.mixins.json:MinecraftMixin,pl:mixin:APP:carryon.mixins.json:MinecraftMixin,pl:mixin:APP:bettercombat.mixins.json:client.MinecraftClientAccessor,pl:mixin:APP:bettercombat.mixins.json:client.MinecraftClientInject,pl:mixin:APP:iceberg.mixins.json:MinecraftMixin,pl:mixin:APP:architectury.mixins.json:MixinMinecraft,pl:mixin:APP:biomemusic.mixins.json:ClientMusicChoiceMixin,pl:mixin:A,pl:runtimedistcleaner:A} at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.m\_91374\_([Minecraft.java:713](https://Minecraft.java:713)) \~\[client-1.19.3-20221207.122022-srg.jar%23320!/:?\] {re:mixin,pl:accesstransformer:B,xf:fml:xaeroworldmap:xaero\_wm\_minecraft\_runtick,pl:runtimedistcleaner:A,re:classloading,pl:accesstransformer:B,xf:fml:xaeroworldmap:xaero\_wm\_minecraft\_runtick,pl:mixin:APP:bookshelf.common.mixins.json:client.AccessorMinecraft,pl:mixin:APP:balm.mixins.json:MinecraftMixin,pl:mixin:APP:carryon.mixins.json:MinecraftMixin,pl:mixin:APP:bettercombat.mixins.json:client.MinecraftClientAccessor,pl:mixin:APP:bettercombat.mixins.json:client.MinecraftClientInject,pl:mixin:APP:iceberg.mixins.json:MinecraftMixin,pl:mixin:APP:architectury.mixins.json:MixinMinecraft,pl:mixin:APP:biomemusic.mixins.json:ClientMusicChoiceMixin,pl:mixin:A,pl:runtimedistcleaner:A} at net.minecraft.client.main.Main.m\_239872\_([Main.java:212](https://Main.java:212)) \~\[forge-44.1.23.jar:?\] {re:classloading,pl:runtimedistcleaner:A} at net.minecraft.client.main.Main.main([Main.java:51](https://Main.java:51)) \~\[forge-44.1.23.jar:?\] {re:classloading,pl:runtimedistcleaner:A} at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) \~\[?:?\] {} at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke([NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77](https://NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)) \~\[?:?\] {} at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke([DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43](https://DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)) \~\[?:?\] {} at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke([Method.java:568](https://Method.java:568)) \~\[?:?\] {} at net.minecraftforge.fml.loading.targets.CommonClientLaunchHandler.lambda$launchService$0([CommonClientLaunchHandler.java:27](https://CommonClientLaunchHandler.java:27)) \~\[fmlloader-1.19.3-44.1.23.jar:?\] {} at cpw.mods.modlauncher.LaunchServiceHandlerDecorator.launch([LaunchServiceHandlerDecorator.java:30](https://LaunchServiceHandlerDecorator.java:30)) \~\[modlauncher-10.0.8.jar:?\] {} at cpw.mods.modlauncher.LaunchServiceHandler.launch([LaunchServiceHandler.java:53](https://LaunchServiceHandler.java:53)) \~\[modlauncher-10.0.8.jar:?\] {} at cpw.mods.modlauncher.LaunchServiceHandler.launch([LaunchServiceHandler.java:71](https://LaunchServiceHandler.java:71)) \~\[modlauncher-10.0.8.jar:?\] {} at [cpw.mods.modlauncher.Launcher.run](https://cpw.mods.modlauncher.Launcher.run)([Launcher.java:106](https://Launcher.java:106)) \~\[modlauncher-10.0.8.jar:?\] {} at cpw.mods.modlauncher.Launcher.main([Launcher.java:77](https://Launcher.java:77)) \~\[modlauncher-10.0.8.jar:?\] {} at cpw.mods.modlauncher.BootstrapLaunchConsumer.accept([BootstrapLaunchConsumer.java:26](https://BootstrapLaunchConsumer.java:26)) \~\[modlauncher-10.0.8.jar:?\] {} at cpw.mods.modlauncher.BootstrapLaunchConsumer.accept([BootstrapLaunchConsumer.java:23](https://BootstrapLaunchConsumer.java:23)) \~\[modlauncher-10.0.8.jar:?\] {} at cpw.mods.bootstraplauncher.BootstrapLauncher.main([BootstrapLauncher.java:141](https://BootstrapLauncher.java:141)) \~\[bootstraplauncher-1.1.2.jar:?\] {}
A detailed walkthrough of the error, its code path and all known details is as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Head --
Thread: Render thread
Stacktrace:
at coda.babyfat.BabyFat$1.([BabyFat.java:107](https://BabyFat.java:107)) \~\[babyfat-forge-1.19.2-1.1.0.jar%23241!/:1.19.2-1.1.0\] {re:classloading}
-- MOD babyfat --
Details:
Mod File: /C:/Users/Intel\_Demo/curseforge/minecraft/Instances/Heroes Of Elysium/mods/babyfat-forge-1.19.2-1.1.0.jar Failure message: Baby Fat (babyfat) has failed to load correctly java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 'void net.minecraft.world.item.CreativeModeTab.(java.lang.String)' Mod Version: 1.19.2-1.1.0 Mod Issue URL: NOT PROVIDED Exception message: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 'void net.minecraft.world.item.CreativeModeTab.(java.lang.String)'
Stacktrace:
at coda.babyfat.BabyFat$1.([BabyFat.java:107](https://BabyFat.java:107)) \~\[babyfat-forge-1.19.2-1.1.0.jar%23241!/:1.19.2-1.1.0\] {re:classloading} at coda.babyfat.BabyFat.([BabyFat.java:107](https://BabyFat.java:107)) \~\[babyfat-forge-1.19.2-1.1.0.jar%23241!/:1.19.2-1.1.0\] {re:classloading} at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) \~\[?:?\] {} at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance([NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:77](https://NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:77)) \~\[?:?\] {} at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance([DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45](https://DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)) \~\[?:?\] {} at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstanceWithCaller([Constructor.java:499](https://Constructor.java:499)) \~\[?:?\] {} at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance([Constructor.java:480](https://Constructor.java:480)) \~\[?:?\] {} at net.minecraftforge.fml.javafmlmod.FMLModContainer.constructMod([FMLModContainer.java:68](https://FMLModContainer.java:68)) \~\[javafmllanguage-1.19.3-44.1.23.jar%23322!/:?\] {} at net.minecraftforge.fml.ModContainer.lambda$buildTransitionHandler$10([ModContainer.java:121](https://ModContainer.java:121)) \~\[fmlcore-1.19.3-44.1.23.jar%23321!/:?\] {} at [java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncRun.run](https://java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncRun.run)([CompletableFuture.java:1804](https://CompletableFuture.java:1804)) \~\[?:?\] {} at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncRun.exec([CompletableFuture.java:1796](https://CompletableFuture.java:1796)) \~\[?:?\] {} at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec([ForkJoinTask.java:373](https://ForkJoinTask.java:373)) \~\[?:?\] {} at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec([ForkJoinPool.java:1182](https://ForkJoinPool.java:1182)) \~\[?:?\] {} at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan([ForkJoinPool.java:1655](https://ForkJoinPool.java:1655)) \~\[?:?\] {re:computing\_frames} at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker([ForkJoinPool.java:1622](https://ForkJoinPool.java:1622)) \~\[?:?\] {re:computing\_frames} at [java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run](https://java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run)([ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:165](https://ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:165)) \~\[?:?\] {}
-- System Details --
Details:
Minecraft Version: 1.19.3 Minecraft Version ID: 1.19.3 Operating System: Windows 10 (amd64) version 10.0 Java Version: 17.0.3, Microsoft Java VM Version: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (mixed mode), Microsoft Memory: 708412928 bytes (675 MiB) / 1287651328 bytes (1228 MiB) up to 4294967296 bytes (4096 MiB) CPUs: 8 Processor Vendor: GenuineIntel Processor Name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz Identifier: Intel64 Family 6 Model 94 Stepping 3 Microarchitecture: Skylake (Client) Frequency (GHz): 3.41 Number of physical packages: 1 Number of physical CPUs: 4 Number of logical CPUs: 8 Graphics card #0 name: Radeon RX 560 Series Graphics card #0 vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (0x1002) Graphics card #0 VRAM (MB): 2048.00 Graphics card #0 deviceId: 0x67ef Graphics card #0 versionInfo: DriverVersion=31.0.12027.9001 Graphics card #1 name: Intel(R) HD Graphics 530 Graphics card #1 vendor: Intel Corporation (0x8086) Graphics card #1 VRAM (MB): 1024.00 Graphics card #1 deviceId: 0x1912 Graphics card #1 versionInfo: DriverVersion=21.20.16.4565 Memory slot #0 capacity (MB): 8192.00 Memory slot #0 clockSpeed (GHz): 2.13 Memory slot #0 type: DDR4 Memory slot #1 capacity (MB): 8192.00 Memory slot #1 clockSpeed (GHz): 2.13 Memory slot #1 type: DDR4 Virtual memory max (MB): 37489.61 Virtual memory used (MB): 31843.34 Swap memory total (MB): 21188.38 Swap memory used (MB): 2811.80 JVM Flags: 4 total; -XX:HeapDumpPath=MojangTricksIntelDriversForPerformance\_javaw.exe\_minecraft.exe.heapdump -Xss1M -Xmx4096m -Xms256m ModLauncher: 10.0.8+10.0.8+main.0ef7e830 ModLauncher launch target: forgeclient ModLauncher naming: srg ModLauncher services: mixin-0.8.5.jar mixin PLUGINSERVICE eventbus-6.0.3.jar eventbus PLUGINSERVICE fmlloader-1.19.3-44.1.23.jar slf4jfixer PLUGINSERVICE fmlloader-1.19.3-44.1.23.jar object\_holder\_definalize PLUGINSERVICE fmlloader-1.19.3-44.1.23.jar runtime\_enum\_extender PLUGINSERVICE fmlloader-1.19.3-44.1.23.jar capability\_token\_subclass PLUGINSERVICE accesstransformers-8.0.4.jar accesstransformer PLUGINSERVICE fmlloader-1.19.3-44.1.23.jar runtimedistcleaner PLUGINSERVICE modlauncher-10.0.8.jar mixin TRANSFORMATIONSERVICE modlauncher-10.0.8.jar fml TRANSFORMATIONSERVICE FML Language Providers: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Mod List: maenchants-1.19.3-6.1.0.jar Ma Enchants maenchants 1.19.3-6.1.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE elytraslot-forge-6.2.0+1.19.3.jar Elytra Slot elytraslot 6.2.0+1.19.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE YungsBetterDungeons-1.19.3-Forge-3.3.0.jar YUNG's Better Dungeons betterdungeons 1.19.3-Forge-3.3.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE trashslot-forge-1.19.3-13.0.1.jar TrashSlot trashslot 13.0.1 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE open-parties-and-claims-forge-1.19.3-0.17.3.jar Open Parties and Claims openpartiesandclaims 0.17.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE TonsOfEnchants-1.19.3-1.0.jar Tons Of Enchantments tonsofenchants 1.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE player-animation-lib-forge-1.0.2+1.19.3.jar Player Animator playeranimator 1.0.2+1.19.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE jei-1.19.3-forge-12.4.0.22.jar Just Enough Items jei [12.4.0.22](https://12.4.0.22)COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE HealthOverlay-1.19.3-8.0.0.jar Health Overlay healthoverlay 8.0.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE callablehorses-1.19.3-1.2.2.5.jar Callable Horses callablehorses [1.2.2.5](https://1.2.2.5)COMMON\_SETManifest: 8c:03:ac:7d:21:62:65:e2:83:91:f3:22:57:99:ed:75:78:1e:db:de:03:99:ef:53:3b:59:95:18:01:bc:84:a9 YungsBetterOceanMonuments-1.19.3-Forge-2.2.0.jar YUNG's Better Ocean Monuments betteroceanmonuments 1.19.3-Forge-2.2.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE libraryferret-forge-1.19.3-4.0.0.jar Library ferret libraryferret 4.0.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE caelus-forge-1.19.4-3.0.0.10.jar Caelus API caelus 1.19.4-3.0.0.10 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE MultiMine-1.19.3.5.jar Multi Mine multimine [1.19.3.5](https://1.19.3.5)COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE immersive\_aircraft-0.4.2+1.19.3-forge.jar Immersive Aircraft immersive\_aircraft 0.4.2+1.19.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE waystones-forge-1.19.3-12.2.0.jar Waystones waystones 12.2.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE villagernames-1.19.3-5.2.jar Villager Names villagernames 5.2 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE XaerosWorldMap\_1.30.3\_Forge\_1.19.3.jar Xaero's World Map xaeroworldmap 1.30.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE JRFTL-1.19.4-1.5.2.jar JRFTL jrftl 1.5.2 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE Prism-1.19.3-forge-1.0.3.jar Prism prism 1.0.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE comforts-forge-6.1.2+1.19.3.jar Comforts comforts 6.1.2+1.19.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE citadel-2.3.3-1.19.3.jar Citadel citadel 2.3.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE alexsmobs-1.22.1.jar Alex's Mobs alexsmobs 1.22.1 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE NaturesCompass-1.19.3-1.10.1-forge.jar Nature's Compass naturescompass 1.19.3-1.10.1-forge COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE artifacts-1.19.3-6.0.4.jar Artifacts artifacts 1.19.3-6.0.4 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE SereneSeasons-1.19.3-8.2.0.29.jar Serene Seasons sereneseasons 0.0NONE COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE YungsApi-1.19.3-Forge-3.9.0.jar YUNG's API yungsapi 1.19.3-Forge-3.9.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE DungeonCrawl-1.19.3-2.3.13.jar Dungeon Crawl dungeoncrawl 2.3.13 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE Bookshelf-Forge-1.19.3-17.1.6.jar Bookshelf bookshelf 17.1.6 COMMON\_SETManifest: eb:c4:b1:67:8b:f9:0c:db:dc:4f:01:b1:8e:61:64:39:4c:10:85:0b:a6:c4:c7:48:f0:fa:95:f2:cb:08:3a:e5 guardvillagers-1.19.3-1.5.5.jar Guard Villagers guardvillagers 1.19.3-1.5.5 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE YungsBetterDesertTemples-1.19.3-Forge-2.3.0.jar YUNG's Better Desert Temples betterdeserttemples 1.19.3-Forge-2.3.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE ExplorersCompass-1.19.3-1.3.0-forge.jar Explorer's Compass explorerscompass 1.19.3-1.3.0-forge COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE balm-forge-1.19.3-5.0.4.jar Balm balm 5.0.4 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE carryon-forge-1.19.3-2.0.5.17.jar Carry On carryon [2.0.5.17](https://2.0.5.17)COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE JustEnoughResources-1.19.3-1.3.2.210.jar Just Enough Resources jeresources [1.3.2.210](https://1.3.2.210)COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE YungsBetterNetherFortresses-1.19.3-Forge-1.1.1.jarYUNG's Better Nether Fortressebetterfortresses 1.19.3-Forge-1.1.1 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE cloth-config-9.0.94-forge.jar Cloth Config v9 API cloth\_config 9.0.94 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE forge-1.19.3-44.1.23-universal.jar Forge forge 44.1.23 COMMON\_SETManifest: 84:ce:76:e8:45:35:e4:0e:63:86:df:47:59:80:0f:67:6c:c1:5f:6e:5f:4d:b3:54:47:1a:9f:7f:ed:5e:f2:90 twilightforest-1.19.3-4.2.1620-universal.jar The Twilight Forest twilightforest 4.2.1620 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE ultris-v5.6.7f.jar Ultris: Boss Expansion ultris\_mr 5.6.7f COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE structure\_gel-1.19.3-2.9.0.jar Structure Gel API structure\_gel 2.9.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE DungeonsArise-1.19.3-2.1.54-beta.jar When Dungeons Arise dungeons\_arise 2.1.54-1.19.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE client-1.19.3-20221207.122022-srg.jar Minecraft minecraft 1.19.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: a1:d4:5e:04:4f:d3:d6:e0:7b:37:97:cf:77:b0:de:ad:4a:47:ce:8c:96:49:5f:0a:cf:8c:ae:b2:6d:4b:8a:3f torchmaster-19.2.2.jar Torchmaster torchmaster 19.2.2 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE handcrafted-forge-1.19.3-2.1.1.jar Handcrafted handcrafted 2.1.1 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE EnchantmentDescriptions-Forge-1.19.3-14.0.7.jar EnchantmentDescriptions enchdesc 14.0.7 COMMON\_SETManifest: eb:c4:b1:67:8b:f9:0c:db:dc:4f:01:b1:8e:61:64:39:4c:10:85:0b:a6:c4:c7:48:f0:fa:95:f2:cb:08:3a:e5 TerraBlender-forge-1.19.3-2.1.0.134.jar TerraBlender terrablender [2.1.0.134](https://2.1.0.134)COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE bettercombat-forge-1.7.1+1.19.3.jar Better Combat bettercombat 1.7.1+1.19.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE babyfat-forge-1.19.2-1.1.0.jar Baby Fat babyfat 1.19.2-1.1.0 ERROR Manifest: NOSIGNATURE silent-lib-1.19.3-7.1.0.jar Silent Lib silentlib 7.1.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE BiomesOPlenty-1.19.3-17.2.0.536.jar Biomes O' Plenty biomesoplenty 17.2.0.536 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE simpleshops-1.2.2.jar Simple Shops simpleshops 1.1.4 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE Jade-1.19.3-forge-9.4.1.jar Jade jade 9.4.1 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE ironfurnaces-1.19.3-3.7.3.jar Iron Furnaces ironfurnaces 3.7.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE dungeons\_plus-1.19.3-1.4.0.jar Dungeons Plus dungeons\_plus 1.4.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE silent-gear-1.19.3-3.3.0.jar Silent Gear silentgear 3.3.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE spectrelib-forge-0.12.4+1.19.2.jar SpectreLib spectrelib 0.12.4+1.19.2 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE zmedievalmusic-1.19.2-2.0.jar medievalmusic mod medievalmusic 1.19.2-2.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE simplybackpacks-1.19.3-2.1.5-build.48.jar Simply Backpacks simplybackpacks 1.19.3-2.1.5-build.4COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE L\_Enders\_Cataclysm-0.81-1.19.3.jar Cataclysm Mod cataclysm 1.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE Iceberg-1.19.3-forge-1.1.6.jar Iceberg iceberg 1.1.6 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE curios-forge-1.19.3-5.1.4.1.jar Curios API curios 1.19.3-5.1.4.1 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE potionring-1.19.3-1.1.jar Potion Rings - REFORGED potionring 1.19.3-1.1 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE LegendaryTooltips-1.19.3-forge-1.4.0.jar Legendary Tooltips legendarytooltips 1.4.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE brutalbosses-1.19.3-6.3.jar brutalbosses mod brutalbosses 1.19.3-6.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE Xaeros\_Minimap\_23.4.4\_Forge\_1.19.3.jar Xaero's Minimap xaerominimap 23.4.4 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE gravestone-1.19.3-1.0.3.jar Gravestone Mod gravestone 1.19.3-1.0.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE Croptopia-1.19.3-FORGE-2.2.2.jar Croptopia croptopia 2.2.2 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE collective-1.19.3-6.53.jar Collective collective 6.53 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE DiagonalFences-v5.0.0-1.19.3-Forge.jar Diagonal Fences diagonalfences 5.0.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: 9a:09:85:98:65:c4:8c:11:c5:49:f6:d6:33:23:39:df:8d:b4:ff:92:84:b8:bd:a5:83:9f:ac:7f:2a:d1:4b:6a bettervillage-forge-1.19.3-3.1.0.jar Better village bettervillage 3.0.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE elevatorid-1.19.3-1.8.11.jar Elevator Mod elevatorid 1.19.3-1.8.11 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE YungsBetterStrongholds-1.19.3-Forge-3.3.0.jar YUNG's Better Strongholds betterstrongholds 1.19.3-Forge-3.3.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE expandedstorage-9.0.0-alpha.2+1.19.3-forge.jar Expanded Storage expandedstorage 9.0.0-alpha.2 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE resourcefullib-1.2.7.jar Resourceful Lib resourcefullib 1.2.7 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE architectury-7.1.86-forge.jar Architectury architectury 7.1.86 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE simplyswords-forge-1.43.1-1.19.3.jar Simply Swords simplyswords 1.43.1-1.19.3 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE lootr-1.19.3-0.5.25.62.jar Lootr lootr [0.4.24.61](https://0.4.24.61)COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE biomemusic-1.19.3-1.6.jar biomemusic mod biomemusic 1.19.3-1.6 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE PuzzlesLib-v5.0.33-1.19.3-Forge.jar Puzzles Lib puzzleslib 5.0.33 COMMON\_SETManifest: 9a:09:85:98:65:c4:8c:11:c5:49:f6:d6:33:23:39:df:8d:b4:ff:92:84:b8:bd:a5:83:9f:ac:7f:2a:d1:4b:6a Aquaculture-1.19.3-2.4.11.jar Aquaculture 2 aquaculture 1.19.3-2.4.11 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE FastLeafDecay-30.jar FastLeafDecay fastleafdecay 30 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE CosmeticArmorReworked-1.19.3-v1a.jar CosmeticArmorReworked cosmeticarmorreworked 1.19.3-v1a COMMON\_SETManifest: 5e:ed:25:99:e4:44:14:c0:dd:89:c1:a9:4c:10:b5:0d:e4:b1:52:50:45:82:13:d8:d0:32:89:67:56:57:01:53 expandability-forge-7.0.0.jar ExpandAbility expandability 7.0.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE YungsBetterMineshafts-1.19.3-Forge-3.3.0.jar YUNG's Better Mineshafts bettermineshafts 1.19.3-Forge-3.3.0 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE overloadedarmorbar-1.19.3-7.1.jar Overloaded Armor Bar overloadedarmorbar 1.19.3-7.1 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE veinmining-forge-1.1.2+1.19.4.jar Vein Mining veinmining 1.1.2+1.19.4 COMMON\_SETManifest: NOSIGNATURE Crash Report UUID: 34059f44-4472-481e-a701-0476b03526b5 FML: 44.1 Forge: net.minecraftforge:44.1.23
submitted by
Boring-Forever-5839 to
CurseForge [link] [comments]
2023.05.31 20:20 Prestigious_Mango_88 Chip Drop Splitter Pt 2
| Got an unusually large trunk from Chip Drop. Bucked into 16-18 inch rounds, then used the splitter vertically to break them into manageable pieces. Pretty satisfying taking suck a massive chunk of wood and getting it split into firewood sized pieces. If you enjoy a challenge there is a TON of free wood out there that often ends up getting landfilled. Can’t recommend this 40 ton TC splitter enough if you are taking the logs that arborists are getting rid of for almost no money. submitted by Prestigious_Mango_88 to firewood [link] [comments] |
2023.05.30 17:50 Then_Marionberry_259 MAY 30, 2023 CCW.V CANADA SILVER COBALT PLANS TO APPLY FOR RECOVERY PERMIT
| https://preview.redd.it/u69ir8hupz2b1.png?width=3500&format=png&auto=webp&s=b3fccaa05d4634f103c78104933277c04da0e56f (TheNewswire) https://preview.redd.it/yzkmggkupz2b1.png?width=720&format=png&auto=webp&s=1ee2263bfbdfb29594a17f7ee30e181ef7e327ee Coquitlam, BC – TheNewswire - May 30, 2023 - Canada Silver Cobalt Works Inc. (TSXV:CCW) (OTC:CCWOF) (Frankfurt:4T9B) (the “Company” or “Canada Silver Cobalt”) announces that the Company is pleased that the Ontario Legislature has approved Bill 71 containing changes to the Ontario Mining Act which marks the way for regulations of the recovery permit. The recovery permit will be a streamlined method to reprocess historic mine wastes like the Beaver Mine and Castle Mine stamp mill tailings. “We are excited that Bill 71 is approved and will lead to new developments in regulation in Ontario including the mineral recovery permit. This should enable us to process tailings like those at the Beaver Mine in a cost effective and timely manner and could lead to new opportunities that previously had unneeded hurdles. Not only will this allow companies like Canada Silver Cobalt to turn historic hazards into profits but gives us the opportunity to clean out deleterious elements from the environment, and restacking or disposing of tailings in a cleaner more stable fashion,” said Matt Halliday, P.Geo. President of Canada Silver Cobalt Works Inc. Potential Sites for Application of Recovery Permit: Beaver Mine Tailings Canada Silver Cobalt Works completed 127 sonic holes for 354 meters recovered at the Beaver Mine and 378 samples were assayed for silver, cobalt, nickel and copper. The grade for tailings was high with silver assays ranging from 13.7 to 314 grams per tonne. See news release from February 5, 2021, Castle Mine Tailings SGS Lakefield produced a gravity concentrate from the Castle Mine tailings grading 389 g/t silver. 0.63 g/t gold and 0.20% cobalt. See news release from March 1, 2019. According to Ontario’s Critical Minerals Strategy , the government is encouraging mineral recovery from mining waste. Mining is becoming cleaner through new technology that reduces environmental impacts. To facilitate mineral recovery, Ontario amended the Mining Act to introduce the new recovery permit. This will allow the reprocessing of mining wastes without the requirement to file a mine production closure plan or obtain a mining lease. The government has stated it is committed to developing the regulatory framework for the mineral recovery program, and is exploring innovative solutions for rethinking mining wastes. The intention is to measure success by reducing the burden and realizing cost savings for the mineral development sector, reduce the time an application takes, increase clarity on the regulatory requirement and application process. Part of the framework: To obtain a recovery permit to undertake this activity, an applicant is required to demonstrate in its application that it will remediate the land such that the condition of the land, with respect to one or more of: (i) public health and safety or (ii) the environment, is improved following the recovery and remediation activities. (Source: Environmental Registry of Ontario March 2, 2023 ero.ontario.ca ) The recovery permit provisions have not yet come into force. Qualified person The technical information in this news release was approved and prepared under the supervision of Mr. Matthew Halliday, P.Geo., (PGO), President and COO of Canada Silver Cobalt Works Inc., a qualified person accordance with National Instrument 43-101. Quality Assurance/Quality Control The Beaver tailings were sampled using a Sonic drill. The drill holes are all vertical with a maximum hole length of 4.78 m and a maximum sample length of 1.6 m (average individual sample length 0.8 m). Drill sample recovery is around 85%. Two quality control samples (blank and standards) were inserted into each batch of 20 samples. The tailings samples were placed in a plastic bag, tagged and sealed then shipped to ALS laboratory Val D'Or. The entire sample was dried, weighed and fully pulverized up to 250 g 85% <75 µm. Samples were then split using riffle splitter and 35 elements were analysed using Aqua Regia ICP-AES. Samples grading above 100 g/t Ag, 10,000 ppm Cu, 10,000 ppm Mo, 10,000 ppm Pb or 10,000 ppm Zn were reanalysed using OG46 Method. A total of 10 blank and 10 standards (STD 1 and STD 2) were used during the sampling program. A 120-kilogram sample from the Castle mine’s historic tailings pond was randomly collected in pails and subsequently transported by courier to SGS Laboratories, an accredited lab in Lakefield, Ontario. Samples were submitted for assay. Aqua regia digestion and atomic absorption finish were used for silver, gold, cobalt, nickel and copper analysis. Cautionary Statement No resource estimate or economic analysis of the Castle tailings area has been carried out by the Company. Canada Cobalt will not be basing a production decision at Castle on a feasibility study of mineral reserves demonstrating economic and technical viability, and as a result there is increased uncertainty and there are multiple technical and economic risks of failure associated with such a decision. These risks, among others, include areas that are analyzed in more detail in a feasibility study, such as applying economic analysis to resources and reserves, more detailed metallurgy and a number of specialized studies in areas such as mining and recovery methods, market analysis, and environmental and community impacts. About Canada Silver Cobalt Works Inc. Canada Silver Cobalt Works Inc. recently discovered a major high-grade silver vein system at Castle East located 1.5 km from its 100%-owned, past-producing Castle Mine near Gowganda in the prolific and world-class silver-cobalt mining district of Northern Ontario. The Company has completed a 60,000m drill program aimed at expanding the size of the deposit with an update to the resource estimate underway. In May 2020, based on a small initial drill program, the Company published the region’s first 43-101 resource estimate that contained a total of 7.56 million ounces of silver in Inferred resources, comprising very high-grade silver (8,582 grams per tonne un-cut or 250.2 oz/ton) in 27,400 tonnes of material from two sections (1A and 1B) of the Castle East Robinson Zone, beginning at a vertical depth of approximately 400 meters. Note that mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Please refer to Canada Silver Cobalt Works Press Release May 28, 2020, for the resource estimate. Report reference: Rachidi, M. 2020, NI 43-101 Technical Report Mineral Resource Estimate for Castle East, Robinson Zone, Ontario, Canada, with an effective date of May 28, 2020, and a signature date of July 13, 2020. The Company also has: (1) 14 battery metals properties in Northern Quebec where it has recently completed a nearly 16,000-metre drill program on the Graal property; and (2) the prospective 1,000-hectare Eby-Otto gold property close to Agnico Eagle’s high-grade Macassa Mine near Kirkland Lake, Ontario where it is exploring. (3) lithium property – 230 square kilometers of greenfield exploration ground focussed along a significant volcanic sedimentary rock – Archean granite contact near Cochrane, Ontario contiguous to Power Metals’ Case Lake Lithium properties. Canada Silver Cobalt’s flagship silver-cobalt Castle mine and 78 sq. km Castle Property feature strong exploration upside for silver, cobalt, nickel, gold, and copper. With underground access at the fully owned Castle Mine, an exceptional high-grade silver discovery at Castle East, a pilot plant to produce cobalt-rich gravity concentrates, a processing facility (TTL Laboratories) in the town of Cobalt, and a proprietary hydrometallurgical process known as Re-2Ox (for the creation of technical-grade cobalt sulphate as well as nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) formulations), Canada Silver Cobalt is strategically positioned to become a Canadian leader in the silver-cobalt space. More information at www.canadasilvercobaltworks.com “Frank J. Basa” Frank J. Basa, P. Eng. Chief Executive Officer For further information, contact: Frank J. Basa, P.Eng. Chief Executive Officer 416-625-2342 Or: Wayne Cheveldayoff, Corporate Communications P: 416-710-2410 E: [ [email protected]](mailto: [email protected]) Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Service Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. This news release may contain forward-looking statements which include, but are not limited to, comments that involve future events and conditions, which are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Except for statements of historical facts, comments that address resource potential, upcoming work programs, geological interpretations, receipt and security of mineral property titles, availability of funds, and others are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may vary materially from those statements. General business conditions are factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from forward-looking statements. A detailed discussion of the risk factors encountered by Canada Silver Cobalt is available in the Company’s Annual Information Form dated July 19, 2021 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 available under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Copyright (c) 2023 TheNewswire - All rights reserved. https://preview.redd.it/cahftllupz2b1.png?width=4000&format=png&auto=webp&s=14465dbc733f6d676e537c060f620060e66c9e29 submitted by Then_Marionberry_259 to Treaty_Creek [link] [comments] |
2023.05.30 16:01 ExcellentElevator399 Strange DNS queries
Does anyone know what might be causing these?
These requests are logged in PiHole and not sure what would have caused them..
There's a ton more
They originated from the IP addresses of both of my Ubiquiti APs :
TIME TYPE DOMAIN CLIENT STATUS Reply ACTION
2023-05-29 10:36:27 TXT 5ad4aad1.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:36:32 TXT beb28731.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:36:32 TXT beb28731.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:36:32 TXT 860c8ef6.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:36:32 TXT beb28731.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:36:32 TXT 860c8ef6.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:37:00 TXT 990e4129.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:37:00 TXT 990e4129.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:37:00 TXT 666a352c.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:37:00 TXT 990e4129.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:37:00 TXT 666a352c.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:37:38 TXT 59133e72.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:37:38 TXT 59133e72.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:37:38 TXT 52bc0e44.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:37:38 TXT 59133e72.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 10:37:38 TXT 52bc0e44.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:09:38 TXT 66846496.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:09:38 TXT 96d2fe58.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:09:38 TXT 66846496.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:09:38 TXT 96d2fe58.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:11:24 TXT d29d5744.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:11:24 TXT d29d5744.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:11:24 TXT 318946cd.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:11:24 TXT d29d5744.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:11:24 TXT 318946cd.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:11:45 TXT c48e8a9d.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:11:45 TXT c48e8a9d.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:11:45 TXT a7a99976.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:11:45 TXT c48e8a9d.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:11:45 TXT a7a99976.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:12:57 TXT b4efbecf.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:12:57 TXT b4efbecf.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:12:57 TXT c40ce556.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:12:57 TXT b4efbecf.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:12:57 TXT c40ce556.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:13:21 TXT f6807637.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:13:21 TXT f6807637.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:13:21 TXT 7b8e381e.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:13:21 TXT f6807637.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:13:21 TXT 7b8e381e.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:14:54 TXT e8bcfc16.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:14:54 TXT e8bcfc16.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:14:54 TXT 458b6dfb.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:14:54 TXT e8bcfc16.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:14:54 TXT 458b6dfb.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:14:56 TXT 13ad4bc2.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:14:56 TXT 13ad4bc2.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:14:56 TXT 7ae83260.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:14:56 TXT 13ad4bc2.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:14:56 TXT 7ae83260.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:15:18 TXT 20d48d44.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:15:18 TXT 20d48d44.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:15:18 TXT 67e62f66.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:15:18 TXT 20d48d44.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:15:18 TXT 67e62f66.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:15:47 TXT f5916c43.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:15:47 TXT f5916c43.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
2023-05-29 11:15:47 TXT 4ab7771c.test
192.168.1.xxx Unknown (0) N/A
submitted by
ExcellentElevator399 to
Ubiquiti [link] [comments]
2023.05.29 08:17 Bacon_00 Sunshine v0.20.0 Released
https://github.com/LizardByte/Sunshine/releases/tag/v0.20.0 Tons of fixes and changes. Doesn't seem like there are any major performance increases this time, but as it's already excellent that isn't too surprising!
Breaking - (Windows) The Windows installer version of Sunshine is now always launched by the Sunshine Service. Manually launching Sunshine.exe from Program Files is no longer supported. This was necessary to address security issues caused by non-admin users having access to Sunshine's config data. If you have set up Task Scheduler or other mechanisms to launch Sunshine automatically, remove those from your system before updating.
- (Windows) The Start Menu shortcut has been redesigned for use with the Sunshine Service. It now launches Sunshine in the background (if not already running) and opens the Web UI, avoiding the persistent Command Prompt window present in prior versions. The Start Menu shortcut is now the recommended method for opening the Web UI and launching Sunshine.
- (Network/UPnP) If the Moonlight Internet Hosting Tool is installed alongside Sunshine, you must remove it or upgrade to v5.6 or later to prevent conflicts with Sunshine's UPnP support. As a reminder, the Moonlight Internet Hosting Tool is not required to stream over the Internet with Sunshine. Instead, simply enable UPnP in the Sunshine Web UI.
- (Windows) If Steam is installed, the Steam Streaming Speakers driver will be automatically installed when starting a stream for the first time. This behavior can be disabled in the Audio/Video tab of the Web UI. This Steam driver enables support for surround sound and muting host audio without requiring any manual configuration.
- (Input) The Back Button Timeout option has been renamed to Guide Button Emulation Timeout and has been disabled by default to ensure long presses on the Back button work by default. The previous behavior can be restored by setting the Guide Button Emulation Timeout to 2000.
- (Windows) The service name of SunshineSvc has been changed to SunshineService to address a false positive in MalwareBytes. If you have any scripts or other logic on your system that is using the service name, you will need to update that for the new name.
- (Windows) To support new installer features, install-service.bat no longer sets the service to auto-start by default. Users executing install-service.bat manually on the Sunshine portable build must also execute autostart-service.bat to start Sunshine on boot. However, installing the service manually like this is not recommended. Instead, use the Sunshine installer which handles service installation and configuration automatically.
- (Linux/Fedora) Fedora 36 builds are removed due to upstream end of support
Added - (Windows) Added an option to launch apps and prep/undo commands as administrator
- (InstalleWindows) Added an option to choose whether Sunshine launches on boot. If not configured to launch on boot, use the Start Menu shortcut to start Sunshine when desired.
- (Input/Windows) Added option to send VK codes instead of scancodes for compatibility with iOS/Android devices using non-English keyboard layouts
- (UI) The Apply/Restart option is now available in the Web UI for all platforms
- (Systray) Added a Restart option to the system tray context menu
- (Video/Windows) Added host latency data to video frames. This requires future updates to Moonlight to display in the on-screen overlay.
- (Audio) Added support for matching Audio Sink and Virtual Sink values on device names
- (Client) Added friendly error messages for clients when streaming fails to start
- (Video/Windows) Added warning log messages when Windows is hiding DRM-protected content from display capture
- (Interop/Windows) Added warning log messages when GeForce Experience is currently using the same ports as Sunshine
- (Linux/Fedora) Fedora 38 builds are now available
Changed - (Video) Encoder selection now happens at each stream start for more reliable GPU detection
- (Video/Windows) The host display now stays on while clients are actively streaming
- (Audio) Streaming will no longer fail if audio capture is unavailable
- (Audio/Windows) Sunshine will automatically switch back to the Virtual Sink if the default audio device is changed while streaming
- (Audio) Changes to the host audio playback option will now take effect when resuming a session from Moonlight
- (Audio/Windows) Sunshine will switch to a different default audio device if Steam Streaming Speakers are the default when Sunshine starts. This handles cases where Sunshine terminates unexpectedly without restoring the default audio device.
- (Apps) The Connection Terminated dialog will no longer appear in Moonlight when the app on the host exits normally
- (Systray/Windows) Quitting Sunshine via the system tray will now stop the Sunshine Service rather than leaving it running and allowing it to restart Sunshine
- (UI) The 100.64.0.0/10 CGN IP address range is now treated as a LAN address range
- (Video) Removed a workaround for some versions of Moonlight prior to mid-2022
- (UI) The PIN field is now cleared after successfully pairing
- (UI) User names are now treated as case-insensitive
- (Linux) Changed udev rule to automatically grant access to virtual input devices
- (UI) Several item descriptions were adjusted to reflect newer configuration recommendations
- (UI) Placeholder text opacity has been reduced to improve contrast with non-placeholder text
- (Video/Windows) Minor capture performance improvements
Fixed - (Video) VRAM usage while streaming is significantly reduced, particularly with higher display resolutions and HDR
- (Network/UPnP) UPnP support was rewritten to fix several major issues handling router restarts, IP address changes, and port forwarding expiration
- (Input) Fixed modifier keys from the software keyboard on Android clients
- (Audio) Fixed handling of default audio device changes while streaming
- (Windows) Fixed streaming after Microsoft Remote Desktop or Fast User Switching has been used
- (Input) Fixed some games not recognizing emulated Guide button presses
- (Video/Windows) Fixed incorrect gamma when using an Advanced Color SDR display on the host
- (InstalleWindows) The installer is no longer blurry on High DPI systems
- (Systray/Windows) Fixed multiple system tray icons appearing if Sunshine exits unexpectedly
- (Systray/Windows) Fixed the system tray icon not appearing in several situations
- (Windows) Fixed hang on shutdown/restart if mDNS registration fails
- (UI) Fixed missing response headers
- (Stability) Fixed several possible crashes in cases where the client did not successfully connect
- (Stability) Fixed several memory leaks
- (Input/Windows) Back/Select input now correctly generates the Share button when emulating DS4 controllers
- (Audio/Windows) Fixed various bugs in audio-info.exe that led to inaccurate output on some systems
- (Video/Windows) Fixed incorrect resolution values from dxgi-info.exe on High DPI systems
- (Video/Linux) Fixed poor quality encoding from H.264 on Intel encoders
- (Config) Fixed a couple of typos in predefined resolutions
Dependencies - Bump sphinx-copybutton from 0.5.1 to 0.5.2
- Bump sphinx from 6.13 to 7.0.1
- Bump third-party/nv-codec-headers from 2055784 to 2cd175b
- Bump furo from 2023.3.27 to 2023.5.20
Misc - (Build/Linux) Add X11 to PLATFORM_LIBARIES when found
- (Build/macOS) Fix compilation with Clang 14
- (Docs) Fix nvlax URL
- (Docs) Add diagrams using graphviz
- (Docs) Improvements to source code documentation
- (Build) Unpin docker dependencies
- (Build/Linux) Honor install prefix for tray icon
- (Build/Windows) Unstripped binaries are now provided as a debuginfo package to support crash dump debugging
- (Config) Config directories are now created recursively
submitted by
Bacon_00 to
cloudygamer [link] [comments]
2023.05.28 04:36 Boss2731 Docsis 3.1 modem help.
I bought a Motorola DOCSIS 3.1 modem about six months ago. I’ve been experiencing drop outs for a while and finally got around to looking into the issue. I did some reading online and figured out where to start looking. I logged into my modem and saw that I was getting fluctuations in my rx signal throughout the day and a ton of both corrected and uncorrected errors on all of the channels. I removed a splitter that the cable company had installed outside my house a few years ago. This helped a lot, but didn’t totally fix the problem. Today, I replaced the cable inside from the wall to the modem which seems to have completely fixed my problem. I’ve had the modem back on all day and there are zero uncorrected errors on any of the channels. The only channel with corrected errors is channel 1. I noticed that channel 1 also has OFDM PLC modulation vs QAM256 that the rest have. The frequency is much higher and the rx signal is also about 3db higher. Can someone explain to me the differences and why that one channel is getting errors when the others aren’t?
Thanks
submitted by
Boss2731 to
HomeNetworking [link] [comments]
2023.05.27 18:37 theanswriz42 Insanely high SNR leading to quite a few drops
Comcast recently did some work in my neighborhood (2 or 3 weeks ago) and since then, I've had terribly high SNRs (often times well into the 30s) which has led to incredibly unstable connectivity. This past week the company sent out a contractor to troubleshoot, and he determined the best course of action would be to run all new cables from the pole to my house (which I was grateful for) and Comcast is going to bury at some point. However, he made it clear that the issue overall was on ISP's end and there was little else he could do. At this point I'm not sure how to get someone from Comcast itself out to my house to further troubleshoot the issue and come to a resolution, as every time I get on chat the people seem to allude that everything is fine, and then someone from a call center ends up reaching out saying as much which is incredibly frustrating.
Below is the diagnostic data from my modem:
Cable Diagnostic Status: Poor Action: [Partial Service] If the Partial Service mode does not go away within a few hours (Click the Refresh button after each step): 1) Make sure the coaxial cable is tightly connected. 2) Remove any unnecessary splitters. 3) Replace any required ones. 4) Contact your service provider for troubleshooting help. CM Status: Good Downstream Status: Poor Partial Service: Poor Cable modem is in partial service mode. Your service provider might be under maintenance. Most of the time it won't affect your traffic and will automatically clear when work is complete. Downstream Power Level: Good Downstream SNR Level: Good Upstream Status: Good Upstream Power Level: Good Current Time: Sat May 27 11:21:59 2023 Startup Procedure Acquire Downstream Channel: 519000000 Hz Locked Connectivity State: OK Operational Boot State: OK Operational Security: Enabled BPI+ IP Provisioning Mode: Honor MDD IPv6 only Downstream Bonded Channels (Partial Service) Channel LockedStatus Modulation ChannelID Frequency Power SNR Correctables Uncorrectables 1 Locked QAM256 20 519000000 Hz -0.3 43.7 0 0 2 Locked QAM256 1 399000000 Hz 1 44.3 0 0 3 Locked QAM256 2 405000000 Hz 2.3 45.3 0 0 4 Locked QAM256 3 411000000 Hz 2.3 45.3 0 0 5 Locked QAM256 4 417000000 Hz 2.5 45.5 0 0 6 Locked QAM256 5 423000000 Hz 1.8 45 0 0 7 Locked QAM256 6 429000000 Hz 2 45.1 0 0 8 Locked QAM256 7 435000000 Hz 1.5 44.6 0 0 9 Locked QAM256 8 441000000 Hz 1.8 44.9 0 0 10 Locked QAM256 9 453000000 Hz 0.6 44.1 0 0 11 Locked QAM256 10 459000000 Hz 0.9 44.5 0 0 12 Locked QAM256 11 465000000 Hz 1.2 44.6 0 0 13 Locked QAM256 12 471000000 Hz 1.6 44.9 0 0 14 Locked QAM256 13 477000000 Hz -1.3 42.5 0 0 15 Locked QAM256 14 483000000 Hz 0.7 44.2 0 0 16 Locked QAM256 15 489000000 Hz 1 44.5 0 0 17 Locked QAM256 16 495000000 Hz 0.8 44.4 0 0 18 Locked QAM256 17 501000000 Hz -0.5 43.2 0 0 19 Locked QAM256 18 507000000 Hz 1.4 44.8 0 0 20 Locked QAM256 19 513000000 Hz 0.7 44.5 0 0 21 Locked QAM256 21 525000000 Hz 0.6 44.3 0 0 22 Locked QAM256 22 531000000 Hz 0.6 44.3 0 0 23 Locked QAM256 23 537000000 Hz -0.1 43.8 0 0 24 Locked QAM256 24 543000000 Hz -0.6 43.3 0 0 25 Locked QAM256 25 555000000 Hz -0.1 43.7 13 0 26 Locked QAM256 26 561000000 Hz -0.2 43.5 12 0 27 Locked QAM256 27 567000000 Hz -0.3 43.4 0 0 28 Locked QAM256 28 573000000 Hz -0.1 43.5 0 0 29 Locked QAM256 29 579000000 Hz -0.7 43.1 0 0 30 Locked QAM256 30 585000000 Hz -0.1 43.5 0 0 31 Locked QAM256 31 591000000 Hz 0.3 43.8 0 0 32 Locked QAM256 32 597000000 Hz 0.4 43.8 0 0 Upstream Bonded Channels Channel LockedStatus ChannelType ChannelID SymbolRate Frequency Power 1 Locked ATDMA 1 5120 Ksym/sec 35600000 Hz 42.3 dBmV 2 Locked ATDMA 2 5120 Ksym/sec 29200000 Hz 41.5 dBmV 3 Locked ATDMA 3 5120 Ksym/sec 22800000 Hz 40.8 dBmV 4 Locked ATDMA 4 5120 Ksym/sec 16400000 Hz 39.8 dBmV 5 Locked ATDMA 5 1280 Ksym/sec 39600000 Hz 39.8 dBmV 6 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 0 0.0 7 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 0 0.0 8 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 0 0.0 Downstream OFDM Channels Channel LockedStatus ProfileID ChannelID Frequency Power SNMER ActiveSubcarrier Unerror Correctable Uncorrectable 1 Locked 0 ,1 ,2 ,3 193 690000000 Hz 6.78 dBmV 27.1 dB 1108 ~ 2987 173626247 108696052 47143617 2 Not Locked 0 0 0 Hz 0 dBmV 0 dB 0 ~ 4095 0 0 0 Upstream OFDMA Channels Channel LockedStatus ProfileID ChannelID Frequency Power 1 Not Locked 0 0 0 Hz 0 dBmV 2 Not Locked 0 0 0 Hz 0 dBmV Event Log Time Priority Description Sat May 27 11:22:01 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:21:55 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 4; Chan ID: 28 31 32 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:21:36 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 1; Chan ID: 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:21:28 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:21:17 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 4; Chan ID: 28 31 32 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:21:07 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 4; Chan ID: 28 31 32; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:21:06 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:20:34 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 4; Chan ID: 28 31 32 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:20:28 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:20:07 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 4; Chan ID: 28 31 32; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:20:07 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 1; Chan ID: 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:20:00 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:19:39 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 20; Chan ID: 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:19:36 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 4; Chan ID: 28 31 32 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:19:18 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:18:58 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 4; Chan ID: 28 31 32 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:18:39 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 1; Chan ID: 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:18:28 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 4; Chan ID: 28 31 32; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:18:22 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:17:59 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 1; Chan ID: 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:17:39 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 4; Chan ID: 28 31 32; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:17:39 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:17:19 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 4; Chan ID: 28 31 32 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:17:14 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:17:14 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 1; Chan ID: 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:16:40 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:16:10 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 1; Chan ID: 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:15:47 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:15:37 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 1; Chan ID: 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:15:20 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:14:19 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 1; Chan ID: 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:14:03 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:13:28 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 4; Chan ID: 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:13:09 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:12:33 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 24; Chan ID: 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: 0.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:12:15 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:11:35 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 4; Chan ID: 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:11:14 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:11:06 2023 Notice (6) CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 1; Chan ID: 193; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; Sat May 27 11:11:03 2023 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=c8:9e:43:eb:ad:50;CMTS-MAC=00:90:f0:46:0a:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;
Hopefully someone from Comcast can help get this resolved in a timely manner. Thanks!
submitted by
theanswriz42 to
Comcast_Xfinity [link] [comments]
2023.05.27 00:21 DaddyDersch The road to 430 continues… 5-26-23 SPY/ ES Futures, QQQ, VIX, DXY and 10YR YIELD Weekly Market Analysis
| *REPOSTING DUE TO "BANNED TICKER" IN MY PICTURE THAT WASNT THERE* Well it was this time last week that I said I expected us to move to 430s and that we would continue this bull run. The market decided it wanted to pullback and test 410 support first, however, with our first closure over 420 since August 19th I believe this bull run is just getting started. Looking back I was one day too early on Wednesday with my swing calls… shoulda done 3-7dte like I had considered before. EVENTS https://preview.redd.it/6dvogrhn392b1.png?width=623&format=png&auto=webp&s=0f835e41210c8a3a96589ff18a23263813266375 First of if you didn’t know… the markets are all closed Monday! We have 4 fed speakers spread out through the week next week. And we also have a ton of heavy hitting data Wednesday through Friday. The most important one that I am waiting is JOLTS Wednesday, non farm Thursday and unemployment rate Friday. MAKE IT MAKE SENSE If you remember post the last two FOMCs JPOW basically said we are not going to stop rate hiking and that will we will not see any rate cuts in 2023… What did markets do? Markets priced in a bunch of rate cuts by EOY (100bps cuts at one point but for the most part it was 75bps) and that sent the markets absolutely rallying… Now look at this… https://preview.redd.it/blu244xn392b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=ffa281d3574b767eac56502d2fe7b69a3760d566 In the last week the markets have went from a 17.4% odds of a 25bps rate HIKE at the June meeting to now a 71.1% chance of a rate hike… yet what happened this week? We rallied.. https://preview.redd.it/22wl8rbo392b1.png?width=898&format=png&auto=webp&s=0bf6c486dbccbb609eaacd716965dbcec43cb7a4 Now not only that… but the markets went from just one week ago today pricing in a 44.7% odds of 75bps rate CUTS by end of year to now pricing in 39.4% odds (the highest odds) that we do not see any rate cuts by end of year… Now I know markets can be a bit wacky… but how does it make sense that the markets went from expecting a fed pause and 75bps of rate CUTS by end of year to now expecting 25bps of rate HIKES next meeting and NO CUTS in one week and that week closes green on SPY? SPY DAILY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/zxuvczro392b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=d93eeae508dfd0c5969131dece851c851dbba8fe On the Daily we officially established a new demand (support) at 414.55. As I suspected if we pushed higher we would indeed make a new demand. The daily DMI is now waving higher and we have a new demand with bullish weekly support… the upside is what I would be looking for here and there is no real sense in shorting SPY right now. We also closed over 418.78 and 419.5 supply… this means until we put a new supply in and we would need two red days back to back to do that our target remains the 429.68 area I pointed out last Friday. SPY WEEKLY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/jvap7d7p392b1.png?width=952&format=png&auto=webp&s=055f4a2124b1bbf77755c15b0dae9302d408bfe2 On a weekly time frame here the bears actually put up a REALLY big fight and until today the weekly was going to make a new supply and at one point we attempted to set up a closure below the weekly 411.46 demand. Nonetheless though bulls pushed us and we now sit over the 416.09 weekly supply after retesting support of the 411.46 demand. The weekly DMI continues to wave up and we also continue to push higher with no new weekly supply… Our target remains 427.35 and in the chance we blow through that roof I have no major supply level until 453.23. SPY DAILY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/8tdzi1pp392b1.png?width=905&format=png&auto=webp&s=d6fbf7cb6dd0244b72fd4005441653ff802b9ded As you can see from the daily here we once action have made a new lower rising wedge support (this has been a theme for a while now). We also had a very nice v bottom off of 410.53 and we have for the first time since August closed over 419.5 resistance. Its not pictured here but this orange channel has a upper resistance of 427.5. As of right now that is the bulls target. We will keep a close eye on that red rising wedge though as this resistance could still with 3 touches hold as resistance into next week. SPY WEEKLY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/kltuvx4q392b1.png?width=952&format=png&auto=webp&s=aeb7b4292756ecd79b6489c5619f29571af292a6 As you can see we are in a bigger blue rising wedge that days back to September and we are also in more of a short term black/ blue rising wedge. This blue rising wedge resistance is all the way up at 434.27 for next week and shows a clear path to 430-440 by end of June. The black rising wedge resistance sits at 425.4 for next week. The way this weekly candle with the very long wick bounce off the weekly 8ema is makes me believe in continuation to the upside for next week. SPY Weekly levels Supply- 416.1 -> 427.4 Demand- 411.5 -> 381.7 Support- 418.6 -> 411.6 -> 407.7 Resistance- 422 -> 427.4 -> 431.9 FUTURES DAILY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/mu2oa9jq392b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=9b3d6604596f931876189b64402fc393468131d1 On the daily chart here for futures we did have one demand left at 4198 and we officially with establishing a new demand (support) at that critical 4156 area actually have just opened the door to the upside in a big way. With a daily closure over 4208/4216 supply our next logical upside target is 4311. FUTURES WEEKLY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/ji8qvi1r392b1.png?width=669&format=png&auto=webp&s=3a349eef9d3e5e65419473465074c40226813658 Futures weekly is the same story as spy… we attempted to put in a new weekly supply and we also attempted to lose 4130 demand for a while. However as it would be the bulls bounced us right off 4130 demand and now have closed us over 4193 supply. With this move up and the weekly DMI moving up along with no new weekly supply… our favoritism here would be to test 4284 and if we break through that the next major level is all the way up at 4540. FUTURES DAILY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/8b3pz7mr392b1.png?width=918&format=png&auto=webp&s=1fe7ceb6fafd4c03f75daa28a674b9c4024c7ca8 Looking at the daily here on futures we are currently sitting in our 4075 to 4310 channel. Being that we are pushing up that leaves our upside target as 4310. Our rising wedge structure on futures is much different than SPY when we come to resistance but the same support wise. Currently the red rising wedge resistance sits at 4235 for Monday. FUTURES WEEKLY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/6g4ofg2s392b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=a45c85afea02f90775936571092785919cb8e64c On the weekly here you can see that we have the same structure as SPY weekly with the blue rising wedge that slightly bigger followed by the black one. We are now sitting in this 4280 to 4135 channel. Being that we back test the weekly 8ema and 4135 support and was able to hold that shows that we are still bullish here. The black resistance sits at 4243 and the blue rising wedge sits at 4268 for next week. One interesting thing I follow is the JPM collar 7/ 11 week movement. As I said is that usually week 7 to 11 reverses… however, in the chance that the trend does not reverse (which appears to be what is happening right now) then we usually actually see that trend continue even more aggressively. That would mean a potential 3 long bull run could be starting here. That would mean our target is 4300 which is the current JPM collars calls. Futures Weekly Levels Supply- 4193 -> 4284 Demand- 4130 -> 3920 Support- 4184 -> 4132 -> 4075 Resistance- 4230 -> 4283 -> 4328 QQQ DAILY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/l1f97tis392b1.png?width=947&format=png&auto=webp&s=9a0c51152b02f651453cca9cf28a2e35acba9e8f Looking at QQQ daily here we absolutely have rocketed since we put in that 331.35 demand. We now are starting to knock on the door of that 351.57 demand now. If this momentum continues which daily DMI and extreme bull momentum says it should we then should start to looked 351.57 demand -> 357.09 supply and finally the ultimate target of 361.7 demand. However, if we were to retrace at all we should find some major support at the 336.37 to 337.6. QQQ WEEKLY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/e10lvl3t392b1.png?width=934&format=png&auto=webp&s=0075bc032fd75f67544652ee1eaca1ed633d8064 From the weekly stand point here this charts actually is just insane its pretty much just vertical for the last 2 months now. The bears once again were not able to put in a new weekly supply and the DMI remains waving up with extreme bull momentum. The weekly 8ema which will be around 330.67 next week should once again be considered strong support. As of right now the target remains 361.85 and if we happen to go on that 3 week bull run or a blow off top my target is 382.9/ 384.54 demands. QQQ Weekly Levels Supply- 361.85 -> 330.67 -> 318.64 -> 306.06 Demand- 384.54 -> 382.9 -> 322.47 -> 318.18 VIX https://preview.redd.it/65edf4kt392b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=817f97050cd229c9699b6c26b8764d078db7a516 Now here on the VIX we also put a new carrot top in… the one really interesting thing to me here is the fact that the VIX dumped pretty aggressively all morning and we saw almost -10% at one point and I thought we were going to approach the 16.92 support area… however, what happened that was very interesting is that the VIX actually continued to rise today even though SPY was rising. There was a lot of oddities about today trading but the biggest one remains that from pretty much 1130 until EOD the VIX continued to hold flat and then began to rise… however, SPY also began to rise. It definitely is a phenomenon that doesn’t occur often and makes trading hard. The VIX closed at 17.95 just under that critical 17.97 support. I will be watching Tuesday to see if the VIX continues to sell off or not. The VIX most certainly was reacting (the market) to the fact that a debt ceiling agreement has NOT been reached and as far as I know they are about to go to recess and will not be back in session until Tuesday. Which means according to Yellen if we run out on the 1st that they will have essentially two full days (Tuesday and Wednesday) to come to an agreement… DXY/ 10YR YIELD https://preview.redd.it/fypqqkzt392b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=f3a0960e0633dd35f09ba44f4def8f29526b44be Now I follow the 10yr and DXY every day but I don’t really talk about it every day… but I do find it very interesting that DXY and 10YR both are in the exact same bull channel since the 2nd week of May. What I also find interesting is that DXY and 10YR daily look like a massive cup and handle which means DXY should hit 105.13 to 105.63 again and 10YR should hit 4.011% to 4.049% again. What really is odd about this is the fact that the last time DXY was at this level was March 13th to March 17th, February 16th to February 23rd, and December 13th to January 6th. Spy traded (at close) 385.36 to 389.99, 408.28 to 400.66 and 401.97 to 388.08 during those time periods for an average SPY closing price of 395.67. That means with our closure at 420.02 SPY is trading 6.1% higher than it was when DXY has traded at these levels in the past or about $25. The last time the 10YR was at these levels was March 10th, February 10th to 15th, January 3rd to 5th and December 23rd. During those time periods SPY traded at close at 385.91, 408.04 to 413.98, 380.82 to 379.38 and 382.91. For an average at close trade price of 389.98 which is about $30 higher than current close or 7.7% higher. What does that mean? Well it could mean everything or it could mean nothing… I just find it interesting that over the last 6 months when the 10YR and DXY have been at these levels historically SPY has been trading much much lower. It also is very odd to watch the 10YR and DYX continue to rise each day as SPY and TECH continues to rise… This all feels very much like something is going to break and its going to break in a big big way… the question is just when. WEEKLY TRADING LOG Today was another tough day of trading for me and I ended up closing out a small red day. The last month or so now I have found it extremely difficult for me to remain profitable on Thursday and Fridays. I seem to be in this cycle of absolutely killing it on Monday through Wednesday and then struggling like crazy on Thursday/ Friday. Honestly for me it all comes down to my strategy. My strategy as I have mentioned relies on the technicals of the market. I do not share my full strat but some things I look at and put a ton of weigh in is momentum, DMI, VOLD and VIX. The hardest part about these explosive rallies we have had lately is the fact that those metrics are not aligning. The other hard part is that there is times where after the huge run up where the technicals will point to a perfect put entry… of course I take that and the issue is that the techncials immediately cycle but little to no movement is ever had. The other issue is that it seems like lately premiums at least the last two days for sure have completely lagged moves. I know this morning I played two puts and a call. None of those seemed despite winning on all three to pay any decent reward. I had a few mid day plays too some I closed small wins/ loss and others I stopped that for the size of the move that happened the premium did not reward us very much at all… https://preview.redd.it/vhz6r09v392b1.png?width=925&format=png&auto=webp&s=b98905ecb7105aa397574ea8a74d6f647ecb38d4 I actually did close out my most profitable week of the year again and this is now my 8th green week ibn a row making it my longest win streak of 2023 and my 2nd longest of the last 2 years. One interesting this is that this is also my 2nd lowest weekly win rate of 2023. I had a great beginning of the week but lately as I have said I struggled to close. I have a really nice 3 day weekend again and I have a few things I would like to back test and I have the time to do it. I have one more indicator I use and have on my charts all day as I trade but I don’t necessarily use it on every entry… I am considering if its time to put more weight into it… but I will not be able to do that until I back test… I hope you guys all have a great weekend and for any of you who have had a someone you know whether a friend or family member serve and lost their lives defending our country… I truly thank you for your sacrifice. See you guys Tuesday! submitted by DaddyDersch to wallstreetbets [link] [comments] |
2023.05.27 00:15 DaddyDersch The road to 430 continues… 5-26-23 SPY/ ES Futures, QQQ, VIX, DXY and 10YR YIELD Weekly Market Analysis
| Well it was this time last week that I said I expected us to move to 430s and that we would continue this bull run. The market decided it wanted to pullback and test 410 support first, however, with our first closure over 420 since August 19th I believe this bull run is just getting started. Looking back I was one day too early on Wednesday with my swing calls… shoulda done 3-7dte like I had considered before. EVENTS https://preview.redd.it/a81rx5fp292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=1eee4736d859ccbc77fbc30fb2d7dd5092264eab First of if you didn’t know… the markets are all closed Monday! We have 4 fed speakers spread out through the week next week. And we also have a ton of heavy hitting data Wednesday through Friday. The most important one that I am waiting is JOLTS Wednesday, non farm Thursday and unemployment rate Friday. MAKE IT MAKE SENSE If you remember post the last two FOMCs JPOW basically said we are not going to stop rate hiking and that will we will not see any rate cuts in 2023… What did markets do? Markets priced in a bunch of rate cuts by EOY (100bps cuts at one point but for the most part it was 75bps) and that sent the markets absolutely rallying… Now look at this… https://preview.redd.it/q6on98wp292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=34e234a4f187ce915261bd2a280af00a729f96f2 In the last week the markets have went from a 17.4% odds of a 25bps rate HIKE at the June meeting to now a 71.1% chance of a rate hike… yet what happened this week? We rallied.. https://preview.redd.it/vp3tntbq292b1.png?width=898&format=png&auto=webp&s=af6a1ad37bfca2ce9183bb4c0bd76fb7941a8451 Now not only that… but the markets went from just one week ago today pricing in a 44.7% odds of 75bps rate CUTS by end of year to now pricing in 39.4% odds (the highest odds) that we do not see any rate cuts by end of year… Now I know markets can be a bit wacky… but how does it make sense that the markets went from expecting a fed pause and 75bps of rate CUTS by end of year to now expecting 25bps of rate HIKES next meeting and NO CUTS in one week and that week closes green on SPY? SPY DAILY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/u6u0jqxq292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=baf1a208f9668041eb4172725c1c94643b1e150d On the Daily we officially established a new demand (support) at 414.55. As I suspected if we pushed higher we would indeed make a new demand. The daily DMI is now waving higher and we have a new demand with bullish weekly support… the upside is what I would be looking for here and there is no real sense in shorting SPY right now. We also closed over 418.78 and 419.5 supply… this means until we put a new supply in and we would need two red days back to back to do that our target remains the 429.68 area I pointed out last Friday. SPY WEEKLY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/vwey5rir292b1.png?width=952&format=png&auto=webp&s=eff1d77d01744eea4b13c7f83c4e8c53ed252f3e On a weekly time frame here the bears actually put up a REALLY big fight and until today the weekly was going to make a new supply and at one point we attempted to set up a closure below the weekly 411.46 demand. Nonetheless though bulls pushed us and we now sit over the 416.09 weekly supply after retesting support of the 411.46 demand. The weekly DMI continues to wave up and we also continue to push higher with no new weekly supply… Our target remains 427.35 and in the chance we blow through that roof I have no major supply level until 453.23. SPY DAILY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/sph7bm5s292b1.png?width=905&format=png&auto=webp&s=0b0578b097da66262a303b19017d9385358d8132 As you can see from the daily here we once action have made a new lower rising wedge support (this has been a theme for a while now). We also had a very nice v bottom off of 410.53 and we have for the first time since August closed over 419.5 resistance. Its not pictured here but this orange channel has a upper resistance of 427.5. As of right now that is the bulls target. We will keep a close eye on that red rising wedge though as this resistance could still with 3 touches hold as resistance into next week. SPY WEEKLY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/pihrmrks292b1.png?width=952&format=png&auto=webp&s=0db7bb128be560679ebd83d4db89c8e28fc58aa8 As you can see we are in a bigger blue rising wedge that days back to September and we are also in more of a short term black/ blue rising wedge. This blue rising wedge resistance is all the way up at 434.27 for next week and shows a clear path to 430-440 by end of June. The black rising wedge resistance sits at 425.4 for next week. The way this weekly candle with the very long wick bounce off the weekly 8ema is makes me believe in continuation to the upside for next week. SPY Weekly levels Supply- 416.1 -> 427.4 Demand- 411.5 -> 381.7 Support- 418.6 -> 411.6 -> 407.7 Resistance- 422 -> 427.4 -> 431.9 FUTURES DAILY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/ea6dw9zs292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=236a9379ffe2a18a2322b64ecf212d1222a066f0 On the daily chart here for futures we did have one demand left at 4198 and we officially with establishing a new demand (support) at that critical 4156 area actually have just opened the door to the upside in a big way. With a daily closure over 4208/4216 supply our next logical upside target is 4311. FUTURES WEEKLY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/xzfv5aht292b1.png?width=669&format=png&auto=webp&s=90752aa9983dc187d4ec6e672e33ecb72bb28b12 Futures weekly is the same story as spy… we attempted to put in a new weekly supply and we also attempted to lose 4130 demand for a while. However as it would be the bulls bounced us right off 4130 demand and now have closed us over 4193 supply. With this move up and the weekly DMI moving up along with no new weekly supply… our favoritism here would be to test 4284 and if we break through that the next major level is all the way up at 4540. FUTURES DAILY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/5yjsr9vt292b1.png?width=918&format=png&auto=webp&s=0fa0421d42d4023c0bc40b0a7e9fe793a0107ac5 Looking at the daily here on futures we are currently sitting in our 4075 to 4310 channel. Being that we are pushing up that leaves our upside target as 4310. Our rising wedge structure on futures is much different than SPY when we come to resistance but the same support wise. Currently the red rising wedge resistance sits at 4235 for Monday. FUTURES WEEKLY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/nq79pcbu292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=12b0c27df00d5661d7c5d02f70e3806195977f6c On the weekly here you can see that we have the same structure as SPY weekly with the blue rising wedge that slightly bigger followed by the black one. We are now sitting in this 4280 to 4135 channel. Being that we back test the weekly 8ema and 4135 support and was able to hold that shows that we are still bullish here. The black resistance sits at 4243 and the blue rising wedge sits at 4268 for next week. One interesting thing I follow is the JPM collar 7/ 11 week movement. As I said is that usually week 7 to 11 reverses… however, in the chance that the trend does not reverse (which appears to be what is happening right now) then we usually actually see that trend continue even more aggressively. That would mean a potential 3 long bull run could be starting here. That would mean our target is 4300 which is the current JPM collars calls. Futures Weekly Levels Supply- 4193 -> 4284 Demand- 4130 -> 3920 Support- 4184 -> 4132 -> 4075 Resistance- 4230 -> 4283 -> 4328 QQQ DAILY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/vpn2zhsu292b1.png?width=947&format=png&auto=webp&s=80e754a01911e0b871efb721713bd5844347c7af Looking at QQQ daily here we absolutely have rocketed since we put in that 331.35 demand. We now are starting to knock on the door of that 351.57 demand now. If this momentum continues which daily DMI and extreme bull momentum says it should we then should start to looked 351.57 demand -> 357.09 supply and finally the ultimate target of 361.7 demand. However, if we were to retrace at all we should find some major support at the 336.37 to 337.6. QQQ WEEKLY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/fr82ye8v292b1.png?width=934&format=png&auto=webp&s=a422eea1be0a7acde97c13692d9a10acb7bfd57b From the weekly stand point here this charts actually is just insane its pretty much just vertical for the last 2 months now. The bears once again were not able to put in a new weekly supply and the DMI remains waving up with extreme bull momentum. The weekly 8ema which will be around 330.67 next week should once again be considered strong support. As of right now the target remains 361.85 and if we happen to go on that 3 week bull run or a blow off top my target is 382.9/ 384.54 demands. QQQ Weekly Levels Supply- 361.85 -> 330.67 -> 318.64 -> 306.06 Demand- 384.54 -> 382.9 -> 322.47 -> 318.18 VIX https://preview.redd.it/1n6zgyov292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=c1bf14ab2c29e7468719f80d50debcc9eb086963 Now here on the VIX we also put a new carrot top in… the one really interesting thing to me here is the fact that the VIX dumped pretty aggressively all morning and we saw almost -10% at one point and I thought we were going to approach the 16.92 support area… however, what happened that was very interesting is that the VIX actually continued to rise today even though SPY was rising. There was a lot of oddities about today trading but the biggest one remains that from pretty much 1130 until EOD the VIX continued to hold flat and then began to rise… however, SPY also began to rise. It definitely is a phenomenon that doesn’t occur often and makes trading hard. The VIX closed at 17.95 just under that critical 17.97 support. I will be watching Tuesday to see if the VIX continues to sell off or not. The VIX most certainly was reacting (the market) to the fact that a debt ceiling agreement has NOT been reached and as far as I know they are about to go to recess and will not be back in session until Tuesday. Which means according to Yellen if we run out on the 1st that they will have essentially two full days (Tuesday and Wednesday) to come to an agreement… DXY/ 10YR YIELD https://preview.redd.it/ryi5695w292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=2c80ac812658083c4f006322b431f08a6c25c01f Now I follow the 10yr and DXY every day but I don’t really talk about it every day… but I do find it very interesting that DXY and 10YR both are in the exact same bull channel since the 2nd week of May. What I also find interesting is that DXY and 10YR daily look like a massive cup and handle which means DXY should hit 105.13 to 105.63 again and 10YR should hit 4.011% to 4.049% again. What really is odd about this is the fact that the last time DXY was at this level was March 13th to March 17th, February 16th to February 23rd, and December 13th to January 6th. Spy traded (at close) 385.36 to 389.99, 408.28 to 400.66 and 401.97 to 388.08 during those time periods for an average SPY closing price of 395.67. That means with our closure at 420.02 SPY is trading 6.1% higher than it was when DXY has traded at these levels in the past or about $25. The last time the 10YR was at these levels was March 10th, February 10th to 15th, January 3rd to 5th and December 23rd. During those time periods SPY traded at close at 385.91, 408.04 to 413.98, 380.82 to 379.38 and 382.91. For an average at close trade price of 389.98 which is about $30 higher than current close or 7.7% higher. What does that mean? Well it could mean everything or it could mean nothing… I just find it interesting that over the last 6 months when the 10YR and DXY have been at these levels historically SPY has been trading much much lower. It also is very odd to watch the 10YR and DYX continue to rise each day as SPY and TECH continues to rise… This all feels very much like something is going to break and its going to break in a big big way… the question is just when. WEEKLY TRADING LOG Today was another tough day of trading for me and I ended up closing out a small red day. The last month or so now I have found it extremely difficult for me to remain profitable on Thursday and Fridays. I seem to be in this cycle of absolutely killing it on Monday through Wednesday and then struggling like crazy on Thursday/ Friday. Honestly for me it all comes down to my strategy. My strategy as I have mentioned relies on the technicals of the market. I do not share my full strat but some things I look at and put a ton of weigh in is momentum, DMI, VOLD and VIX. The hardest part about these explosive rallies we have had lately is the fact that those metrics are not aligning. The other hard part is that there is times where after the huge run up where the technicals will point to a perfect put entry… of course I take that and the issue is that the techncials immediately cycle but little to no movement is ever had. The other issue is that it seems like lately premiums at least the last two days for sure have completely lagged moves. I know this morning I played two puts and a call. None of those seemed despite winning on all three to pay any decent reward. I had a few mid day plays too some I closed small wins/ loss and others I stopped that for the size of the move that happened the premium did not reward us very much at all… https://preview.redd.it/55hj0gqw292b1.png?width=925&format=png&auto=webp&s=8a250981b8213897afab98cf9206835a2c57bd89 I actually did close out my most profitable week of the year again and this is now my 8th green week ibn a row making it my longest win streak of 2023 and my 2nd longest of the last 2 years. One interesting this is that this is also my 2nd lowest weekly win rate of 2023. I had a great beginning of the week but lately as I have said I struggled to close. I have a really nice 3 day weekend again and I have a few things I would like to back test and I have the time to do it. I have one more indicator I use and have on my charts all day as I trade but I don’t necessarily use it on every entry… I am considering if its time to put more weight into it… but I will not be able to do that until I back test… I hope you guys all have a great weekend and for any of you who have had a someone you know whether a friend or family member serve and lost their lives defending our country… I truly thank you for your sacrifice. See you guys Tuesday! submitted by DaddyDersch to Daytrading [link] [comments] |
2023.05.27 00:14 DaddyDersch The road to 430 continues… 5-26-23 SPY/ ES Futures, QQQ, VIX, DXY and 10YR YIELD Weekly Market Analysis
| Well it was this time last week that I said I expected us to move to 430s and that we would continue this bull run. The market decided it wanted to pullback and test 410 support first, however, with our first closure over 420 since August 19th I believe this bull run is just getting started. Looking back I was one day too early on Wednesday with my swing calls… shoulda done 3-7dte like I had considered before. EVENTS https://preview.redd.it/qjawr42f292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=ee706112fd47e230332bf345e5b7c83e6d1c38c6 First of if you didn’t know… the markets are all closed Monday! We have 4 fed speakers spread out through the week next week. And we also have a ton of heavy hitting data Wednesday through Friday. The most important one that I am waiting is JOLTS Wednesday, non farm Thursday and unemployment rate Friday. MAKE IT MAKE SENSE If you remember post the last two FOMCs JPOW basically said we are not going to stop rate hiking and that will we will not see any rate cuts in 2023… What did markets do? Markets priced in a bunch of rate cuts by EOY (100bps cuts at one point but for the most part it was 75bps) and that sent the markets absolutely rallying… Now look at this… https://preview.redd.it/8zz3tzxf292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=1915a87c88ce0e33e3abeec1f45b63dd03f4f5f3 In the last week the markets have went from a 17.4% odds of a 25bps rate HIKE at the June meeting to now a 71.1% chance of a rate hike… yet what happened this week? We rallied.. https://preview.redd.it/4skx0yeg292b1.png?width=898&format=png&auto=webp&s=8b28d29b66e7ad7358ccaa8dff7e499ef1d8b4c1 Now not only that… but the markets went from just one week ago today pricing in a 44.7% odds of 75bps rate CUTS by end of year to now pricing in 39.4% odds (the highest odds) that we do not see any rate cuts by end of year… Now I know markets can be a bit wacky… but how does it make sense that the markets went from expecting a fed pause and 75bps of rate CUTS by end of year to now expecting 25bps of rate HIKES next meeting and NO CUTS in one week and that week closes green on SPY? SPY DAILY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/ioj7hwug292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=3250c8bbe738867307da4ea8748187b34c138e5c On the Daily we officially established a new demand (support) at 414.55. As I suspected if we pushed higher we would indeed make a new demand. The daily DMI is now waving higher and we have a new demand with bullish weekly support… the upside is what I would be looking for here and there is no real sense in shorting SPY right now. We also closed over 418.78 and 419.5 supply… this means until we put a new supply in and we would need two red days back to back to do that our target remains the 429.68 area I pointed out last Friday. SPY WEEKLY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/6em1p7gh292b1.png?width=952&format=png&auto=webp&s=155909c08b914e3abd026cea4f27a773444517c3 On a weekly time frame here the bears actually put up a REALLY big fight and until today the weekly was going to make a new supply and at one point we attempted to set up a closure below the weekly 411.46 demand. Nonetheless though bulls pushed us and we now sit over the 416.09 weekly supply after retesting support of the 411.46 demand. The weekly DMI continues to wave up and we also continue to push higher with no new weekly supply… Our target remains 427.35 and in the chance we blow through that roof I have no major supply level until 453.23. SPY DAILY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/lqc4yjvh292b1.png?width=905&format=png&auto=webp&s=5c7d31115d23b67d38dd0a1297777eb8666cd780 As you can see from the daily here we once action have made a new lower rising wedge support (this has been a theme for a while now). We also had a very nice v bottom off of 410.53 and we have for the first time since August closed over 419.5 resistance. Its not pictured here but this orange channel has a upper resistance of 427.5. As of right now that is the bulls target. We will keep a close eye on that red rising wedge though as this resistance could still with 3 touches hold as resistance into next week. SPY WEEKLY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/szf7dm9i292b1.png?width=952&format=png&auto=webp&s=c8e0c99459fb2d6dc67ff385d6cdf420eb851e85 As you can see we are in a bigger blue rising wedge that days back to September and we are also in more of a short term black/ blue rising wedge. This blue rising wedge resistance is all the way up at 434.27 for next week and shows a clear path to 430-440 by end of June. The black rising wedge resistance sits at 425.4 for next week. The way this weekly candle with the very long wick bounce off the weekly 8ema is makes me believe in continuation to the upside for next week. SPY Weekly levels Supply- 416.1 -> 427.4 Demand- 411.5 -> 381.7 Support- 418.6 -> 411.6 -> 407.7 Resistance- 422 -> 427.4 -> 431.9 FUTURES DAILY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/yqa402pi292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=9c58185164cedea8e936dea9b1dc7b6be16abe1b On the daily chart here for futures we did have one demand left at 4198 and we officially with establishing a new demand (support) at that critical 4156 area actually have just opened the door to the upside in a big way. With a daily closure over 4208/4216 supply our next logical upside target is 4311. FUTURES WEEKLY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/q7n40l6j292b1.png?width=669&format=png&auto=webp&s=4a3ead6fd61597ef7efdc9b05a6958744ae798a1 Futures weekly is the same story as spy… we attempted to put in a new weekly supply and we also attempted to lose 4130 demand for a while. However as it would be the bulls bounced us right off 4130 demand and now have closed us over 4193 supply. With this move up and the weekly DMI moving up along with no new weekly supply… our favoritism here would be to test 4284 and if we break through that the next major level is all the way up at 4540. FUTURES DAILY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/3esl1cnj292b1.png?width=918&format=png&auto=webp&s=a5eb4129d8ee1d3a12e1daee437df7a3a9a857f3 Looking at the daily here on futures we are currently sitting in our 4075 to 4310 channel. Being that we are pushing up that leaves our upside target as 4310. Our rising wedge structure on futures is much different than SPY when we come to resistance but the same support wise. Currently the red rising wedge resistance sits at 4235 for Monday. FUTURES WEEKLY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/u69lzi3k292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=d068dd9de9b785bab540ba00f025bd90b794021b On the weekly here you can see that we have the same structure as SPY weekly with the blue rising wedge that slightly bigger followed by the black one. We are now sitting in this 4280 to 4135 channel. Being that we back test the weekly 8ema and 4135 support and was able to hold that shows that we are still bullish here. The black resistance sits at 4243 and the blue rising wedge sits at 4268 for next week. One interesting thing I follow is the JPM collar 7/ 11 week movement. As I said is that usually week 7 to 11 reverses… however, in the chance that the trend does not reverse (which appears to be what is happening right now) then we usually actually see that trend continue even more aggressively. That would mean a potential 3 long bull run could be starting here. That would mean our target is 4300 which is the current JPM collars calls. Futures Weekly Levels Supply- 4193 -> 4284 Demand- 4130 -> 3920 Support- 4184 -> 4132 -> 4075 Resistance- 4230 -> 4283 -> 4328 QQQ DAILY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/zq4mlrmk292b1.png?width=947&format=png&auto=webp&s=80b8aa2662a3a2ece03e20421bd175fa7762d33b Looking at QQQ daily here we absolutely have rocketed since we put in that 331.35 demand. We now are starting to knock on the door of that 351.57 demand now. If this momentum continues which daily DMI and extreme bull momentum says it should we then should start to looked 351.57 demand -> 357.09 supply and finally the ultimate target of 361.7 demand. However, if we were to retrace at all we should find some major support at the 336.37 to 337.6. QQQ WEEKLY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/008lc44l292b1.png?width=934&format=png&auto=webp&s=1133bcbb0929103ea8a6c3304e13510b96334f1f From the weekly stand point here this charts actually is just insane its pretty much just vertical for the last 2 months now. The bears once again were not able to put in a new weekly supply and the DMI remains waving up with extreme bull momentum. The weekly 8ema which will be around 330.67 next week should once again be considered strong support. As of right now the target remains 361.85 and if we happen to go on that 3 week bull run or a blow off top my target is 382.9/ 384.54 demands. QQQ Weekly Levels Supply- 361.85 -> 330.67 -> 318.64 -> 306.06 Demand- 384.54 -> 382.9 -> 322.47 -> 318.18 VIX https://preview.redd.it/3583bykl292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=5d8d1f5b6d23b6604dd2eb79277b201879a0e1d0 Now here on the VIX we also put a new carrot top in… the one really interesting thing to me here is the fact that the VIX dumped pretty aggressively all morning and we saw almost -10% at one point and I thought we were going to approach the 16.92 support area… however, what happened that was very interesting is that the VIX actually continued to rise today even though SPY was rising. There was a lot of oddities about today trading but the biggest one remains that from pretty much 1130 until EOD the VIX continued to hold flat and then began to rise… however, SPY also began to rise. It definitely is a phenomenon that doesn’t occur often and makes trading hard. The VIX closed at 17.95 just under that critical 17.97 support. I will be watching Tuesday to see if the VIX continues to sell off or not. The VIX most certainly was reacting (the market) to the fact that a debt ceiling agreement has NOT been reached and as far as I know they are about to go to recess and will not be back in session until Tuesday. Which means according to Yellen if we run out on the 1st that they will have essentially two full days (Tuesday and Wednesday) to come to an agreement… DXY/ 10YR YIELD https://preview.redd.it/1eemhb0m292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=6806a17d393e89d6db3160e317d81437bc31f9f1 Now I follow the 10yr and DXY every day but I don’t really talk about it every day… but I do find it very interesting that DXY and 10YR both are in the exact same bull channel since the 2nd week of May. What I also find interesting is that DXY and 10YR daily look like a massive cup and handle which means DXY should hit 105.13 to 105.63 again and 10YR should hit 4.011% to 4.049% again. What really is odd about this is the fact that the last time DXY was at this level was March 13th to March 17th, February 16th to February 23rd, and December 13th to January 6th. Spy traded (at close) 385.36 to 389.99, 408.28 to 400.66 and 401.97 to 388.08 during those time periods for an average SPY closing price of 395.67. That means with our closure at 420.02 SPY is trading 6.1% higher than it was when DXY has traded at these levels in the past or about $25. The last time the 10YR was at these levels was March 10th, February 10th to 15th, January 3rd to 5th and December 23rd. During those time periods SPY traded at close at 385.91, 408.04 to 413.98, 380.82 to 379.38 and 382.91. For an average at close trade price of 389.98 which is about $30 higher than current close or 7.7% higher. What does that mean? Well it could mean everything or it could mean nothing… I just find it interesting that over the last 6 months when the 10YR and DXY have been at these levels historically SPY has been trading much much lower. It also is very odd to watch the 10YR and DYX continue to rise each day as SPY and TECH continues to rise… This all feels very much like something is going to break and its going to break in a big big way… the question is just when. WEEKLY TRADING LOG Today was another tough day of trading for me and I ended up closing out a small red day. The last month or so now I have found it extremely difficult for me to remain profitable on Thursday and Fridays. I seem to be in this cycle of absolutely killing it on Monday through Wednesday and then struggling like crazy on Thursday/ Friday. Honestly for me it all comes down to my strategy. My strategy as I have mentioned relies on the technicals of the market. I do not share my full strat but some things I look at and put a ton of weigh in is momentum, DMI, VOLD and VIX. The hardest part about these explosive rallies we have had lately is the fact that those metrics are not aligning. The other hard part is that there is times where after the huge run up where the technicals will point to a perfect put entry… of course I take that and the issue is that the techncials immediately cycle but little to no movement is ever had. The other issue is that it seems like lately premiums at least the last two days for sure have completely lagged moves. I know this morning I played two puts and a call. None of those seemed despite winning on all three to pay any decent reward. I had a few mid day plays too some I closed small wins/ loss and others I stopped that for the size of the move that happened the premium did not reward us very much at all… https://preview.redd.it/4i7l73jm292b1.png?width=925&format=png&auto=webp&s=f501a90c088cce95ec496bf13f71b44b820d22c9 I actually did close out my most profitable week of the year again and this is now my 8th green week ibn a row making it my longest win streak of 2023 and my 2nd longest of the last 2 years. One interesting this is that this is also my 2nd lowest weekly win rate of 2023. I had a great beginning of the week but lately as I have said I struggled to close. I have a really nice 3 day weekend again and I have a few things I would like to back test and I have the time to do it. I have one more indicator I use and have on my charts all day as I trade but I don’t necessarily use it on every entry… I am considering if its time to put more weight into it… but I will not be able to do that until I back test… I hope you guys all have a great weekend and for any of you who have had a someone you know whether a friend or family member serve and lost their lives defending our country… I truly thank you for your sacrifice. See you guys Tuesday! submitted by DaddyDersch to wallstreetbets [link] [comments] |
2023.05.27 00:12 DaddyDersch The road to 430 continues… 5-26-23 SPY/ ES Futures, QQQ, VIX, DXY and 10YR YIELD Weekly Market Analysis
| Well it was this time last week that I said I expected us to move to 430s and that we would continue this bull run. The market decided it wanted to pullback and test 410 support first, however, with our first closure over 420 since August 19th I believe this bull run is just getting started. Looking back I was one day too early on Wednesday with my swing calls… shoulda done 3-7dte like I had considered before. EVENTS https://preview.redd.it/pi86z324292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=4346691ce1daf5ee3e5684ced273cec3214ced1f First of if you didn’t know… the markets are all closed Monday! We have 4 fed speakers spread out through the week next week. And we also have a ton of heavy hitting data Wednesday through Friday. The most important one that I am waiting is JOLTS Wednesday, non farm Thursday and unemployment rate Friday. MAKE IT MAKE SENSE If you remember post the last two FOMCs JPOW basically said we are not going to stop rate hiking and that will we will not see any rate cuts in 2023… What did markets do? Markets priced in a bunch of rate cuts by EOY (100bps cuts at one point but for the most part it was 75bps) and that sent the markets absolutely rallying… Now look at this… https://preview.redd.it/d8ec8k05292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=e8c6bd4b89723f8ba30c2e9a557e749e148d53e8 In the last week the markets have went from a 17.4% odds of a 25bps rate HIKE at the June meeting to now a 71.1% chance of a rate hike… yet what happened this week? We rallied.. https://preview.redd.it/yjuj7tg5292b1.png?width=898&format=png&auto=webp&s=89b562fff8474a15e3ea86825f60aaa250439cd0 Now not only that… but the markets went from just one week ago today pricing in a 44.7% odds of 75bps rate CUTS by end of year to now pricing in 39.4% odds (the highest odds) that we do not see any rate cuts by end of year… Now I know markets can be a bit wacky… but how does it make sense that the markets went from expecting a fed pause and 75bps of rate CUTS by end of year to now expecting 25bps of rate HIKES next meeting and NO CUTS in one week and that week closes green on SPY? SPY DAILY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/a0zuaix5292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=10dd3604f99d1a047593eb0708eda35e893df2ba On the Daily we officially established a new demand (support) at 414.55. As I suspected if we pushed higher we would indeed make a new demand. The daily DMI is now waving higher and we have a new demand with bullish weekly support… the upside is what I would be looking for here and there is no real sense in shorting SPY right now. We also closed over 418.78 and 419.5 supply… this means until we put a new supply in and we would need two red days back to back to do that our target remains the 429.68 area I pointed out last Friday. SPY WEEKLY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/jxhsxzf6292b1.png?width=952&format=png&auto=webp&s=85eba7fd1e60de79c5f5ebd3019feac41afab46e On a weekly time frame here the bears actually put up a REALLY big fight and until today the weekly was going to make a new supply and at one point we attempted to set up a closure below the weekly 411.46 demand. Nonetheless though bulls pushed us and we now sit over the 416.09 weekly supply after retesting support of the 411.46 demand. The weekly DMI continues to wave up and we also continue to push higher with no new weekly supply… Our target remains 427.35 and in the chance we blow through that roof I have no major supply level until 453.23. SPY DAILY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/dqim77x6292b1.png?width=905&format=png&auto=webp&s=9d649922440defd8e464f3cd5122ee204b144842 As you can see from the daily here we once action have made a new lower rising wedge support (this has been a theme for a while now). We also had a very nice v bottom off of 410.53 and we have for the first time since August closed over 419.5 resistance. Its not pictured here but this orange channel has a upper resistance of 427.5. As of right now that is the bulls target. We will keep a close eye on that red rising wedge though as this resistance could still with 3 touches hold as resistance into next week. SPY WEEKLY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/bvvroib7292b1.png?width=952&format=png&auto=webp&s=3876771768e321cbc847362ab8011ec65db810d9 As you can see we are in a bigger blue rising wedge that days back to September and we are also in more of a short term black/ blue rising wedge. This blue rising wedge resistance is all the way up at 434.27 for next week and shows a clear path to 430-440 by end of June. The black rising wedge resistance sits at 425.4 for next week. The way this weekly candle with the very long wick bounce off the weekly 8ema is makes me believe in continuation to the upside for next week. SPY Weekly levels Supply- 416.1 -> 427.4 Demand- 411.5 -> 381.7 Support- 418.6 -> 411.6 -> 407.7 Resistance- 422 -> 427.4 -> 431.9 FUTURES DAILY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/sdavtqq7292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=23ce96dcfd8668ddfb869f9682014f7517f219b6 On the daily chart here for futures we did have one demand left at 4198 and we officially with establishing a new demand (support) at that critical 4156 area actually have just opened the door to the upside in a big way. With a daily closure over 4208/4216 supply our next logical upside target is 4311. FUTURES WEEKLY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/1325dj58292b1.png?width=669&format=png&auto=webp&s=e3678956810df464adcadfa5ca79515f9027f0d4 Futures weekly is the same story as spy… we attempted to put in a new weekly supply and we also attempted to lose 4130 demand for a while. However as it would be the bulls bounced us right off 4130 demand and now have closed us over 4193 supply. With this move up and the weekly DMI moving up along with no new weekly supply… our favoritism here would be to test 4284 and if we break through that the next major level is all the way up at 4540. FUTURES DAILY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/1s6wstj8292b1.png?width=918&format=png&auto=webp&s=7625bb0196829bab45ea5d13eab5213614832d8e Looking at the daily here on futures we are currently sitting in our 4075 to 4310 channel. Being that we are pushing up that leaves our upside target as 4310. Our rising wedge structure on futures is much different than SPY when we come to resistance but the same support wise. Currently the red rising wedge resistance sits at 4235 for Monday. FUTURES WEEKLY PRICE ACTION https://preview.redd.it/qf3v7qx8292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=3be1e1d0bd2d86e908576e31ce737bc6cbdcb99c On the weekly here you can see that we have the same structure as SPY weekly with the blue rising wedge that slightly bigger followed by the black one. We are now sitting in this 4280 to 4135 channel. Being that we back test the weekly 8ema and 4135 support and was able to hold that shows that we are still bullish here. The black resistance sits at 4243 and the blue rising wedge sits at 4268 for next week. One interesting thing I follow is the JPM collar 7/ 11 week movement. As I said is that usually week 7 to 11 reverses… however, in the chance that the trend does not reverse (which appears to be what is happening right now) then we usually actually see that trend continue even more aggressively. That would mean a potential 3 long bull run could be starting here. That would mean our target is 4300 which is the current JPM collars calls. Futures Weekly Levels Supply- 4193 -> 4284 Demand- 4130 -> 3920 Support- 4184 -> 4132 -> 4075 Resistance- 4230 -> 4283 -> 4328 QQQ DAILY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/qzb5cfe9292b1.png?width=947&format=png&auto=webp&s=4cc74f19fb2d9d4feb6d5d9fc7b5859f487957d6 Looking at QQQ daily here we absolutely have rocketed since we put in that 331.35 demand. We now are starting to knock on the door of that 351.57 demand now. If this momentum continues which daily DMI and extreme bull momentum says it should we then should start to looked 351.57 demand -> 357.09 supply and finally the ultimate target of 361.7 demand. However, if we were to retrace at all we should find some major support at the 336.37 to 337.6. QQQ WEEKLY SUPPLY AND DEMAND https://preview.redd.it/uyn2h3u9292b1.png?width=934&format=png&auto=webp&s=8ae3c0b3820d954c9282c358a9d15fe39c1c139e From the weekly stand point here this charts actually is just insane its pretty much just vertical for the last 2 months now. The bears once again were not able to put in a new weekly supply and the DMI remains waving up with extreme bull momentum. The weekly 8ema which will be around 330.67 next week should once again be considered strong support. As of right now the target remains 361.85 and if we happen to go on that 3 week bull run or a blow off top my target is 382.9/ 384.54 demands. QQQ Weekly Levels Supply- 361.85 -> 330.67 -> 318.64 -> 306.06 Demand- 384.54 -> 382.9 -> 322.47 -> 318.18 VIX https://preview.redd.it/g0lq049a292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=e60000b9eacc89573ed12b914f7082c217a332dc Now here on the VIX we also put a new carrot top in… the one really interesting thing to me here is the fact that the VIX dumped pretty aggressively all morning and we saw almost -10% at one point and I thought we were going to approach the 16.92 support area… however, what happened that was very interesting is that the VIX actually continued to rise today even though SPY was rising. There was a lot of oddities about today trading but the biggest one remains that from pretty much 1130 until EOD the VIX continued to hold flat and then began to rise… however, SPY also began to rise. It definitely is a phenomenon that doesn’t occur often and makes trading hard. The VIX closed at 17.95 just under that critical 17.97 support. I will be watching Tuesday to see if the VIX continues to sell off or not. The VIX most certainly was reacting (the market) to the fact that a debt ceiling agreement has NOT been reached and as far as I know they are about to go to recess and will not be back in session until Tuesday. Which means according to Yellen if we run out on the 1st that they will have essentially two full days (Tuesday and Wednesday) to come to an agreement… DXY/ 10YR YIELD https://preview.redd.it/erfdthpa292b1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=72cb754c795ac58ae76462d5dc12faaf1dea5e6b Now I follow the 10yr and DXY every day but I don’t really talk about it every day… but I do find it very interesting that DXY and 10YR both are in the exact same bull channel since the 2nd week of May. What I also find interesting is that DXY and 10YR daily look like a massive cup and handle which means DXY should hit 105.13 to 105.63 again and 10YR should hit 4.011% to 4.049% again. What really is odd about this is the fact that the last time DXY was at this level was March 13th to March 17th, February 16th to February 23rd, and December 13th to January 6th. Spy traded (at close) 385.36 to 389.99, 408.28 to 400.66 and 401.97 to 388.08 during those time periods for an average SPY closing price of 395.67. That means with our closure at 420.02 SPY is trading 6.1% higher than it was when DXY has traded at these levels in the past or about $25. The last time the 10YR was at these levels was March 10th, February 10th to 15th, January 3rd to 5th and December 23rd. During those time periods SPY traded at close at 385.91, 408.04 to 413.98, 380.82 to 379.38 and 382.91. For an average at close trade price of 389.98 which is about $30 higher than current close or 7.7% higher. What does that mean? Well it could mean everything or it could mean nothing… I just find it interesting that over the last 6 months when the 10YR and DXY have been at these levels historically SPY has been trading much much lower. It also is very odd to watch the 10YR and DYX continue to rise each day as SPY and TECH continues to rise… This all feels very much like something is going to break and its going to break in a big big way… the question is just when. WEEKLY TRADING LOG Today was another tough day of trading for me and I ended up closing out a small red day. The last month or so now I have found it extremely difficult for me to remain profitable on Thursday and Fridays. I seem to be in this cycle of absolutely killing it on Monday through Wednesday and then struggling like crazy on Thursday/ Friday. Honestly for me it all comes down to my strategy. My strategy as I have mentioned relies on the technicals of the market. I do not share my full strat but some things I look at and put a ton of weigh in is momentum, DMI, VOLD and VIX. The hardest part about these explosive rallies we have had lately is the fact that those metrics are not aligning. The other hard part is that there is times where after the huge run up where the technicals will point to a perfect put entry… of course I take that and the issue is that the techncials immediately cycle but little to no movement is ever had. The other issue is that it seems like lately premiums at least the last two days for sure have completely lagged moves. I know this morning I played two puts and a call. None of those seemed despite winning on all three to pay any decent reward. I had a few mid day plays too some I closed small wins/ loss and others I stopped that for the size of the move that happened the premium did not reward us very much at all… https://preview.redd.it/k4r1z6cb292b1.png?width=925&format=png&auto=webp&s=7a3fbb8f16f733870c5cfaac639c76429d6de69f I actually did close out my most profitable week of the year again and this is now my 8th green week ibn a row making it my longest win streak of 2023 and my 2nd longest of the last 2 years. One interesting this is that this is also my 2nd lowest weekly win rate of 2023. I had a great beginning of the week but lately as I have said I struggled to close. I have a really nice 3 day weekend again and I have a few things I would like to back test and I have the time to do it. I have one more indicator I use and have on my charts all day as I trade but I don’t necessarily use it on every entry… I am considering if its time to put more weight into it… but I will not be able to do that until I back test… I hope you guys all have a great weekend and for any of you who have had a someone you know whether a friend or family member serve and lost their lives defending our country… I truly thank you for your sacrifice. See you guys Tuesday! submitted by DaddyDersch to u/DaddyDersch [link] [comments] |
2023.05.26 20:16 Marzman315 Defending the Draft 2023 - Cleveland Browns
Marzman315 here again for this year's edition of Defending the Draft
Disclaimer:
Well here we are again. Once again I am here to talk about the Cleveland Browns offseason and draft, and this means I will be talking about Deshaun Watson. While I am a Browns fan I am completely sympathetic to the negative feelings toward this player. However I am not responsible for his actions or the team's decision to sign him so don't waste your time insulting me and distracting from the discussion of this post to address his actions, instead use that time and energy to donate to the Cleveland Rape Crisis Center using the link below, as I will not engage in any discussion regarding the QB in any off field capacity:
https://clevelandrapecrisis.org/support/donate-now/ Brief Season Review:
The Browns entered 2022 with very ill-defined expectations. On one hand the roster looked fairly solid on paper, however the bizarre QB situation left many with the knowledge that success would be an uphill battle, and that inconsistent QB play would likely be our downfall.
And it most certainly was.
During Deshaun Watson's 11 game suspension, Jacoby Brissett took over as starting QB. He immediately became a fan favorite, as the Browns won their opening week game for the first time in seventeen years, and largely played fairly well in the opening weeks. Some poor performances against beatable opponents though saw the Browns as a pretty mid-level team as Watson made his debut.
To say he was underwhelming was an understatement. While flashes of the elite play that Watson has demonstrated in the past shone through at times, he was largely mediocre to poor for most of his abridged season, completing just 58% of his passes for 1,100 yards with seven touchdowns and five interceptions. He turned in decent games against Baltimore and Washington, and while most reasonable Browns fans expected him to have a bit of rust, it was hard not to be disappointed.
That being said there was still plenty of fun to be had during the Browns 2022 campaign as well. New receiver Amari Cooper performed as advertised, putting up an impressive 1,160 yards and 9 TDs, Nick Chubb was dominant once again rushing for over 1500 yards and 12 TDs, the offensive line continued to utterly dominate (including surprise breakout player Ethan Pocic). The defense regressed largely due to poor coaching and a down year from Denzel Ward (which could partially be blamed on said coaching) but another absolutely elite season from Myles Garrett, continued improvement from 2021 first round pick Greg Newsome and a fantastic year from third round rookie MJ Emerson kept things from being disastrous.
Coaching Staff and Front Office:
The major change to feature here was the welcome firing of defensive coordinator Joe Woods following the season. Woods' refusal to adjust his scheme to fit the skillsets of his players led to pretty poor results (hence the down year from Ward, an elite man coverage corner who played the vast majority of his snaps in zone coverage) and was replaced with veteran DC Jim Schwartz. Kevin Stefanski remains head coach and despite a few Browns fans losing faith in him, the 2020 NFL Coach of the Year remains a stable presence at a position the Browns have not had much stability in as of late.
Free Agency and Trades:
The Browns came into free agency this season with clear needs and GM Andrew Berry emphasized filling those needs immediately with the opening of free agency. Those three needs were Defensive Tackle, which the Browns basically had nobody playing, an edge defender opposite Myles Garrett, and a safety to replace the departing John Johnson.
The Browns opened free agency by signing Ogbonnia Okoronkwo, former Ram and Texan coming off two great pass rushing seasons, Dalvin Tomlinson, the solid and consistent defensive tackle from Minnesota, and Juan Thornhill, very good coverage safety from the Kansas City Chiefs. They then focused on re-signing players from their core like Ethan Pocic and Sione Takitaki, as well as rounding out their depth with more mid-level free agents at fair deals like Jordan Akins and Trysten Hill. Their final impact move before the draft was a trade for 23 year old slot specialist Elijah Moore from the New York Jets by exchanging their second round pick for the Jets third round pick. A low risk gamble for the high upside Moore who wanted to be featured in the offense a bit more and will be in the Browns offense.
Key Acquisitions/signings:
Dalvin Tomlinson, DT - Signed: 4 yrs $57 million
Juan Thornhill, DB - Signed: 3 yrs $21 million
Ogbonnia Okoronkwo, DE - Signed: 3 yrs $19 million
Jordan Akins, TE - Signed: 2 yrs $3.9 million
Sione Takitaki, LB - Re-signed: $2.4 million
Marquise Goodwin, WR - Signed $1.7 million
Michael Ford, DB - Signed: $1.5 million
Elijah Moore, WR - Traded from NY Jets for draft picks
Za'Darius Smith, DE - Traded from Minnesota for draft picks
Anthony Walker, LB - Re-Signed: 1 yr, $1.2 million
Rodney McCleod, DB - Signed: 1 yr, $1.3 million
Trysten Hill, DL - Signed: 1 yr, $1.2 million
Jordan Kunaszyk, LB - Signed 1 yr, $1.2 million
Key Losses:
Jacoby Brissett, QB - Signed with Washington in FA
Greedy Williams, DB - Signed with Philadelphia in FA
D'Ernest Johnson, RB - Signed with Jacksonville in FA
Taven Bryan, DT - Signed with Indianapolis in FA
Chase Winovich, DE - Signed with Houston in FA
(The following players' deals have expired but as of now they have neither re-signed or signed elsewhere)
John Johnson, DB - Very unlikely to re-sign, replaced by Thornhill/McLeod
Jadeveon Clowney, DE - Very unlikely to re-sign, replaced by Okoronkwo/Smith
Kareem Hunt, RB - unlikely to re-sign, injuries/reduced usage in 2022
Deion Jones, LB - uncertain to resign, average play in 2022, probably redundant with healthy Anthony Walker
Draft Season:
The Browns entered the draft season without any major holes on the starting roster, although their depth at defensive tackle and wide receiver was still lacking. This was good, considering the team had no draft picks until the 74th pick. The Browns have had some mixed success in the mid rounds but ultimately most reasonable fans trust Berry to put together the best roster possible.
The Draft:
Browns trade pick 42 to NYJ for WR Elijah Moore and pick 74.
3.74 - Cedric Tillman, WR Tennessee
Receiver is an interesting position for the Browns because there are a number of guys on the roster that its easy to get excited about but also easy to write off as non-contributors. 2020 sixth round pick Donovan Peoples-Jones was a fairly solid number two with 840 yds and 3 TDs, but struggled to contribute meaningfully late in the season barring a pretty good game against Cincinnati. Third round rookie David Bell had some decent games from the slot but is limited as an outside option, and Anthony Schwartz is good for one or two huge plays a year thanks to his speed but his terrible hands and poor route running simply doesn't justify them.
Enter Cedric Tillman. The big bodied, 6'3" 220 lb outside threat was dominant for Tennessee before injuries saw him limited in his final season. Tillman has huge potential and while he may not play a ton of snaps in 2023 he is auditioning to take over at #2 if Peoples-Jones leaves in free agency following this year.
3.98 - Siaki Ika, DT Baylor
While GM Andrew Berry aggressively attacked the defensive tackle in free agency, the depth of the position was still lacking going into the draft, particularly an adept run stuffer to man the 1T.
And then the 6'3" 335 lb monster Siaki Ika just falls into their laps. Ika was widely considered a first round prospect going into the season, however some reduction in his production in 2022 as well as a disappointing combine saw him fall out of favor a bit, plus the natural lack of value of the nose tackle position he plays. However his good tape is astounding, as it features a very nimble big man who can not only absorb double teams and disrupt run lanes, but positively contribute to pass rushing as well. He will have a role on the Browns from day one, even if he cannot replicate his pass rushing from college, he will be an effective presence on run downs immediately.
4.111 - Dawand Jones, OT Ohio State
The fall of Dawand Jones on draft day was shocking to some and expected by others. He is a prospect of very distinct strengths and weaknesses.
His strengths are obvious from looking at him. Dude's big. At over 6'8" and weighing in at 375 lbs with monstrous 36" arms he's the premier 'first off the bus' guy and has inherent advantages at the position. His tape was very impressive in 2022 and 21, albeit a bit inconsistent at times.
Jones started rubbing people the wrong way at the senior bowl, after an impressive first day he quit on the rest of the program, then showed up seeming a bit out of shape at the Combine. In the fourth round however he is a no-brainer. With Jedrick Wills approaching the last year of his contract and Jack Conklin (despite his recent extension) being somewhat injury prone, Jones has a path to the field early and is in the hands of one of the very best position coaches in the NFL in o-line coach Bill Callahan. A gamble to be sure, but a very worthwhile one.
4.126 - Isaiah McGuire, DE Missouri
The Browns have certainly had a type with their edge rushers as of late. With the exception of Okoronkwo the physical profile of our EDGE rushers is often very similar and McGuire fits that mold exactly. Highly productive at Missouri, McGuire logged over 20 QB hurries in 2021 and 2022 according to PFF. While he did get shut down at times against top level opponents like Georgia, he was a very effective pass rusher and run stopper with a tremendous physical profile, even if his athletic testing was a bit more modest. He will settle in as a rotational edge rusher immediately and compete with Alex Wright for snaps.
5.140 - Dorian Thompson-Robinson , QB UCLA
There have been few QBs in college football over the past five years as modestly dependable and effective as DTR. Passing for over 10,000 yds and 86 TD to 33 INTs over his long college career, with an additional 1800 yds and 27 TDs on the ground, DTR has a pro level arm, excellent mobility, and is a very intelligent passer with good instincts and the ability to progress through his reads. With a QB that has baggage, a dependable backup QB is a necessity.
5.142 - Cameron Mitchell, DB Northwestern
There was a scandal at one point this offseason where one of Cleveland's many dumbass media personalities pushed a rumor that Greg Newsome was unhappy and was demanding a trade. This was immediately rebuked by follow reporters, sources with the team, and Newsome himself, citing a charity program he launched in Cleveland within the few months prior while reiterating his love for the Browns. The reporter was justifiably made a fool of and issued a half-hearted apology soon after.
However just in case, the Browns went ahead and drafted Newsome's best friend just to make him a bit happier. Mitchell was a solid coverage presence at Northwestern, who had some great games against good passing teams including Ohio State. However his tendency to disappear at times as well as his being a better tackler than coverage player (not exactly what you want in a cornerback) saw him fall to the fifth round. He brings solid size and athleticism to the position, and is certainly a worthwhile project.
6.190 - Luke Wypler, IOL Ohio State
A real curiosity of the 2023 NFL draft was the fall of Luke Wypler. The number 54 player on PFF's big board and considered a solid day two choice by most, Wypler found himself falling all the way to the sixth round where he was a welcome addition by the Browns. Perhaps a bit undersized for his frame, he brings solid athleticism and two very good years of production to the position at one of the top programs in the nation. With the team having signed Ethan Pocic to an extension and Wypler's profile locking him to Center pretty much exclusively, his path to the field is not exactly clear (barring injuries) but a player of Wypler's caliber is not often available in the sixth round so that seems like a good problem to have.
Undrafted Free Agents:
Lonnie Phelps, DE Kansas
Mohamoud Diabate, LB Utah
Ronnie Hickman, DB Ohio State
Jeremiah Marin, DE Washington
Hassan Hall, RB Georgia Tech
Tanner McCalister, DB Ohio State
Charlie Thomas III, LB Georgia Tech
Thomas Greaney, TE Albany
Caleb Biggers, DB Boise State
I don't see anyone from this list contributing meaningfully in 2023 barring injury. The days of the Browns depending on starting snaps from UDFAs is thankfully over. That said I can see Phelps and Hickman potentially making the team, perhaps Hassan Hall as well due largely to the lack of depth running backs on the roster.
It was also following the draft that the Browns traded two fifth round picks for Za'Darius Smith, a sixth round pick and a seventh round pick. Smith is an excellent pass rusher who will provide the critical third veteran presence after Okoronkwo and Garrett, allowing the young, more raw guys like Alex Wright and Isaiah McGuire to be more rotational.
Going Forward:
Browns fans that I've spoken to are largely extremely pleased with this draft and offseason as a whole. We came in with clear needs, addressed them definitively in free agency, drafted with a clear BPA approach, and came out of draft season a better team on paper than going in. The depth of the receiving corps is still a bit uncertain, and while most Browns fans may wish we upgraded at DT a bit more I think that the guys that have been starting are better suited as backups anyway.
The season is hard to predict however for much the same reason last year's was; the massive uncertainty at QB. While Deshaun Watson played quite poorly last year it is impossible to predict how he will play with a full offseason with his teammates and coaching staff.
The division and conference is brutally hard but if this team plays to its full potential it is easily a contender for a deep playoff run. If Watson struggles and the defense doesn't improve with the new coaching it could be a long few years ahead. Only time will tell and most Browns fans are approaching the year with a familiar cautious optimism.
Projected 53 Man Roster:
OFFENSE:
QB - Deshaun Watson, Joshua Dobbs,
Dorian Thompson-Robinson (3)
RB - Nick Chubb, Jerome Ford, John Kelly,
Hassan Hall, (7)
WR - Amari Cooper, Donovan Peoples-Jones, Elijah Moore,
Cedric Tillman, David Bell, Marquise Goodwin (13)
TE - David Njoku, Harrison Bryant, Jordan Akins (16)
OT - Jedrick Wills Jr. (LT), Jack Conklin (RT),
Dawand Jones, James Hudson, (20)
OG - Joel Bitonio (LG), Wyatt Teller (RG), Colby Gossett (23)
C - Ethan Pocic,
Luke Wypler (25)
DEFENSE:
DE - Myles Garrett, Ogbonnia Okoronkwo, Za'Darius Smith, Alex Wright,
Isaiah McGuire (30)
DT - Dalvin Tomlinson,
Sikai Ika, Perrion Winfrey, Jordan Elliot, Trysten Hill (35)
LB - Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah, Anthony Walker, Sione Takitaki, Tony Fields, Jordan Kunaszyk (40)
CB - Denzel Ward, Martin Emerson, Greg Newsome, Mike Ford, AJ Green,
Cameron Mitchell (46)
SFTY - Grant Delpit, Juan Thornhill, Rodney McCleod, D'Anthony Bell (50)
SPECIALISTS
K - Cade York (51)
P - Corey Bojorquez (52)
LS - Charley Hughlett (53)
submitted by
Marzman315 to
NFL_Draft [link] [comments]
2023.05.26 04:41 Cydrrria this is how SL gain should be for EVERYONE (the Be-6 is overpowered for SL gain)
2023.05.26 03:06 Proletlariet Smallville Superman Saved
Origin
Born Kal-El of Krypton, his parents Jor-El and Lara sent him to Earth to save him from his doomed planet. Found by Johnathan and Martha Kent, Clark Kent was raised to help others and use his powers for good. Starting out as an opportunistic hero, the trials he went through gradually turned him into Superman, the world's greatest hero.
Name(s): Kal-El, Clark Kent, The Blur, Superman
Family: Jor-El (Biological Father), Lara (Biological Mother), Johnathan Kent (Adoptive Father), Martha Kent (Adoptive Mother), Kara Zor-El/Kara Kent (Paternal Cousin), Kon-El/Conner Kent (Clone), Zor-El (Paternal Uncle), Lois Lane (Wife)
Appearance: Red-Blue Blur The Blur, version two Superman suit, version two
Feat index
- Feats will have a S followed by a number than a E followed by a number in the gif name. So S5E11 means the feat came from season 5 episode 11.
- Comic feats will come from what series or issue they came from which can be found here
- Bolded feats are the best feats are in a category (in my opinion)
Super Strength
Physical/Lifting
Superhuman
One to Five Tons
Five to Ten Tons
Ten to One-hundred Tons
Over One-Hundred tons
Striking
Tearing/Grip Strength
Super Speed
Vaguely Fast/FTE
Supersonic
- Clark can easily catch and react to bullets: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- Clark can dodge bullets: 1, 2, 3
- Clark can outrun bullets: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- Saves Impulse from an electric trap that would trigger if he stopped running for even a millisecond S6E11
- Moves a armored van out of a building without a camera registering the event S10E15
Hypersonic
High Ends
Leaping
Flight
[Scaling] When he gains the ability to fly he's shown to be comparable to the following
Swimming
Invulnerability
Blunt Force
- Completely fine after being hit by a car through a road railing S1E1
- Fine after being rammed through concrete by a truck S1E1
- Greg hits him across a factory S1E2
- Gets hit with a metal rod hard enough to be sent through a tombstone S1E4
- No sells a bus smashing into him S1E9
- Byron slaps him dozens of feet into a shed, destroying it S2E5
- Falls hundreds of feet onto the ground and is fine S2E9
- A boulder shatters when it hits him S2E10
- Gets pounded on by Eric while possibly weakened by Kryptonite and later tanks him smashing a concrete slab on his head S2E20
- Withstands Holly's acid touch which can eat through steel and takes a building collapsing on top of him
- Knives shatter when they hit him, overpowers four men, jumps out of an airplane and lands on the ground with no damage
- Falls over sixty stories into a generator, slams the ground hard enough to shake a underground complex, then gets rammed through concrete column S3E2
- No sells a car smashing into him at 80 MPH S3E8
- No sells a giant slab of concrete smashing into him S4E17
- Tanks a tractor being smashed into him S5E21
- Zod tackles him miles away, rams him into the ground, throws Superman into a tree, smashes him into a boulder, pounds on him for a bit, then throws him through a forest S6E1
- Aldar tosses Clark into a crane but it doesn't harm him S6E8
- Titan hits him multiple times with enough force to shake an arena and break a concrete pillar S6E17
- Gets punched through two pillars S6E21
- Bizarro rams into him hard enough to shake a dam, punches him into a generator, and off-screen delivers a hit that effects the surrounding area S6E22
- Gets smashed through a thick concrete pillar by an amped Bizarro S7E1
- Sent flying through a forest by Kara S7E2
- Sent through a concrete wall by Faora and falls on a van S8E8
- Punched through a building by Doomsday S8E22
- Punched through multiple skyscrapers and punched into the ground by Cyborg Superman S11V1
- After being weakened by red sunlight he gets punch across concrete by Batman and gets hit with a large explosion S11V2
- Withstands multiple attacks from Doomsday 2.0. This fight damaged New Krypton which is a planet sized ship S11V4
Piercing/Cutting
Explosions
Energy
Healing Factor
Other
Heat Vision
Super Breath
Super Senses
Telescopic Vision
Multi-Spectrum Vision
X-Ray Vision
Super Hearing
Mental Capacity
Resistances
Physical
Mind Reading/Mind Control
Skill
Weaknesses
- Kryptonite
- Red Sun Radiation: Energy in the red sun spectrum can weaken and eventually depower Clark, since his body cannot process its low energy into his super powers.
- Magic: Superman has no resistances to magic, meaning he's can be effected as easily as a normal person by it.
submitted by
Proletlariet to
u/Proletlariet [link] [comments]