2014.09.21 15:01 m1sta Hygienic Macros for JavaScript
2018.04.30 00:43 enoua5 TF_IRL: Transformation Memes
2012.09.16 17:07 CeeBeast MaddenUltimateTeam
2023.06.07 02:28 josephlucchetti Sf Giants ferry 2 tickets one way June 9 from Larksburg to oracle
2023.06.07 00:40 angelsbaseball 6/6 Cubs @ Angels [Game Thread]
Team | Starter | TV | Radio |
---|---|---|---|
Cubs | Hayden Wesneski (2-2, 4.81 ERA) | MARQ | WSCR |
Angels | Tyler Anderson (2-1, 5.47 ERA) | BSW | KLAA, KWKW (ES) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHC | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | ||||
LAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
LAA | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | SO | BA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LF | Ward | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .237 |
DH | Ohtani | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .276 |
CF | Trout | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | .266 |
3B | Rendon | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .295 |
1B | Walsh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .162 |
C | Thaiss | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | .282 |
2B | Drury | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .255 |
3B | Urshela | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .308 |
RF | Moniak | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .314 |
SS | Rengifo | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .218 |
LAA | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anderson | 5.0 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 94-58 | 5.62 |
Soriano, J | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-0 | 0.00 |
CHC | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | SO | BA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B | Hoerner | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .286 |
SS | Swanson | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .268 |
LF | Happ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .268 |
RF | Suzuki, S | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .268 |
C | Gomes | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .276 |
DH | Amaya | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .300 |
CF | Tauchman | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | .308 |
3B | Wisdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .202 |
1B | Mervis | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | .188 |
CHC | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wesneski | 4.2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 73-46 | 4.72 |
Hughes | 0.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 15-5 | 5.54 |
Merryweather | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-3 | 4.07 |
Description | Length | Video |
---|---|---|
Bullpen availability for Chicago, June 6 vs Angels | 0:07 | Video |
Bullpen availability for Los Angeles, June 6 vs Cubs | 0:07 | Video |
Fielding alignment for Los Angeles, June 6 vs Cubs | 0:11 | Video |
Starting lineups for Cubs at Angels - June 6, 2023 | 0:09 | Video |
The distance behind Shohei Ohtani's home run | 1:07 | Video |
Analyzing Shohei Ohtani's home run through bat tracking | 0:09 | Video |
Breaking down Hayden Wesneski's pitches | 0:08 | Video |
Mike Tauchman singles to center field, two score | 0:27 | Video |
Matt Mervis doubles to right field, scores two more | 0:28 | Video |
Shohei Ohtani homers to right field in the 4th | 1:00 | Video |
Brandon Drury scores on a wild pitch in the 5th | 0:17 | Video |
Mike Trout singles to center field, scoring two | 0:41 | Video |
Matt Thaiss hits a two-run single to take the lead | 0:41 | Video |
2023.06.07 00:40 ChiCubsbot GDT: 6/6 Cubs (26-33) @ Angels (31-30) 8:38 PM
Team | Starter | TV | Radio |
---|---|---|---|
Cubs | Hayden Wesneski (2-2, 4.81 ERA) | MARQ | WSCR |
Angels | Tyler Anderson (2-1, 5.47 ERA) | BSW | KLAA, KWKW (ES) |
MLB | Fangraphs | Baseball Savant | Reddit Stream | IRC Chat | Channel Finder |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gameday | Game Graph | Strikezone Map | Live Comments | Libera: ##baseball | Channel Finder |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHC | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | ||||
LAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
LAA | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | SO | BA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LF | Ward | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .237 |
DH | Ohtani | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .276 |
CF | Trout | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | .266 |
3B | Rendon | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .295 |
1B | Walsh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .162 |
C | Thaiss | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | .282 |
2B | Drury | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .255 |
3B | Urshela | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .308 |
RF | Moniak | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .314 |
SS | Rengifo | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .218 |
LAA | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anderson | 5.0 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 94-58 | 5.62 |
Soriano, J | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0 | 0.00 |
CHC | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | SO | BA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B | Hoerner | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .286 |
SS | Swanson | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .268 |
LF | Happ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .268 |
RF | Suzuki, S | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .268 |
C | Gomes | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .276 |
DH | Amaya | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .300 |
CF | Tauchman | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | .308 |
3B | Wisdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .202 |
1B | Mervis | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | .188 |
CHC | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wesneski | 4.2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 73-46 | 4.72 |
Hughes | 0.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 15-5 | 5.54 |
Merryweather | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-3 | 4.07 |
Description | Length | Video |
---|---|---|
Bullpen availability for Chicago, June 6 vs Angels | 0:07 | Video |
Bullpen availability for Los Angeles, June 6 vs Cubs | 0:07 | Video |
Fielding alignment for Los Angeles, June 6 vs Cubs | 0:11 | Video |
Starting lineups for Cubs at Angels - June 6, 2023 | 0:09 | Video |
The distance behind Shohei Ohtani's home run | 1:07 | Video |
Analyzing Shohei Ohtani's home run through bat tracking | 0:09 | Video |
Breaking down Hayden Wesneski's pitches | 0:08 | Video |
Mike Tauchman singles to center field, two score | 0:27 | Video |
Matt Mervis doubles to right field, scores two more | 0:28 | Video |
Shohei Ohtani homers to right field in the 4th | 1:00 | Video |
Brandon Drury scores on a wild pitch in the 5th | 0:17 | Video |
Mike Trout singles to center field, scoring two | 0:41 | Video |
Matt Thaiss hits a two-run single to take the lead | 0:41 | Video |
2023.06.07 00:24 Ikestrman Daily Pick'Em Thread Wednesday, 06/07/2023 Game day
Matchup and Team Records | Probable Pitchers (Season ERA) | Estimated Win Probability |
---|---|---|
Oakland Athletics (12-50) @ Pittsburgh Pirates (32-27) | Hogan Harris (6.97) / Roansy Contreras (4.82) | 36% / 64% |
Seattle Mariners (29-30) @ San Diego Padres (28-32) | George Kirby (3.04) / Michael Wacha (3.48) | 43% / 57% |
Detroit Tigers (26-32) @ Philadelphia Phillies (28-32) | Reese Olson (3.60) / Zack Wheeler (4.33) | 37% / 63% |
Kansas City Royals (18-42) @ Miami Marlins (33-28) | Jordan Lyles (6.89) / Edward Cabrera (4.50) | 38% / 62% |
Minnesota Twins (31-29) @ Tampa Bay Rays (43-19) | Pablo Lopez (4.54) / TBD (-) | 42% / 58% |
Arizona Diamondbacks (35-25) @ Washington Nationals (25-34) | Zach Davies (5.40) / Patrick Corbin (4.92) | 55% / 45% |
Chicago White Sox (26-35) @ New York Yankees (36-25) | Lance Lynn (6.55) / TBD (-) | 35% / 65% |
Houston Astros (36-24) @ Toronto Blue Jays (33-28) | Ronel Blanco (4.15) / Chris Bassitt (3.41) | 49% / 51% |
Boston Red Sox (30-30) @ Cleveland Guardians (27-32) | TBD (-) / Tanner Bibee (3.20) | 47% / 53% |
Los Angeles Dodgers (35-25) @ Cincinnati Reds (27-33) | Noah Syndergaard (6.54) / Brandon Williamson (4.29) | 61% / 39% |
New York Mets (30-30) @ Atlanta Braves (35-24) | Max Scherzer (3.21) / Charlie Morton (3.62) | 43% / 57% |
Baltimore Orioles (37-22) @ Milwaukee Brewers (32-28) | TBD (-) / Corbin Burnes (3.75) | 45% / 55% |
St. Louis Cardinals (25-36) @ Texas Rangers (39-20) | Jack Flaherty (4.55) / Jon Gray (2.51) | 43% / 57% |
San Francisco Giants (29-30) @ Colorado Rockies (26-35) | Logan Webb (2.85) / Connor Seabold (5.40) | 55% / 45% |
Chicago Cubs (26-33) @ Los Angeles Angels (31-30) | Jameson Taillon (7.05) / Jaime Barria (1.59) | 43% / 57% |
2023.06.06 21:14 --Clintoris-- 06/06 NRFI AI - CLINTORIS -
![]() | I am not sure why my old post was deleted? I can't even see it in my history? I know I posted it and I didnt delete it. I am not sure what happened? I feel like the more popular the posts are, weird stuff happens. submitted by --Clintoris-- to sportsbetting [link] [comments] Not to mention the mods on this subreddit have never responded to messages. Likely connected. * YESTERDAY UPDATE NRFI > 50% : OAK/PIT - LOSS - CATCHER INTERFERENCE DET / PHI - LOSS - SEEING EYE SINGLE OVERALL RECORD NRFI > 50% - 13-4 * Today is going to be quick. When I updated lineups and stats, a few NRFI probabilities popped over 50% but none I bet. I think the recent red sox homestand threw off their overall stats and they will struggle in Cleveland. And I also think Luzardo/Greinke have a strong first inning. This AI is a work in progress. FOR SURE a work in progress and sometimes excessively difficult. Oh well. ** I am mixing up my picks. Maybe. After the phillies pick lost I went back in to reverse engineer the loss and the mistake became crystal clear, the phillies had a 31% chance of scoring and the tigers had a 17% chance (or something my freaking post was deleted) so it gave a 52% chance of NRFI. All well and good, until the bottom of the first came up and there was basically a 1:3 chance of an YRFI, I want to keep it at 1:4 chance or higher. * So take these with a grain of salt but I am picking the matchups where both sides have a low chance of an NRFI and other factors. Like the Red Sox have a 32% chance of a run but I dont believe it since they are on the road. * Today's probabilities: (Percentages are likelihood of an NRFI occurring) Minnesota Twins 78.23% Full NRFI 50.02% Rank 4 Odds -135 Tampa Bay Rays 71.79% Detroit Tigers 80.67% Full NRFI 51.58% Rank 2 Odds -105 Philadelphia Phillies 70.91% Kansas City Royals 74.19% Full NRFI 48.14% Rank 5 Odds -145 Miami Marlins 73.95% Oakland Athletics 77.90% Full NRFI 52.54% Rank 1 Odds -105 Pittsburgh Pirates 74.64% Chicago White Sox 74.99% Full NRFI 40.81% Rank 12 Odds -115 New York Yankees 65.81% Houston Astros 66.41% Full NRFI 38.00% Rank 14 Odds -125 Toronto Blue Jays 76.58% Boston Red Sox 68.41% Full NRFI 44.38% Rank 7 Odds -140 Cleveland Guardians 75.97% Los Angeles Dodgers 62.07% Full NRFI 43.29% Rank 9 Odds 105 Cincinnati Reds 81.22% New York Mets 76.26% Full NRFI 43.37% Rank 8 Odds 100 Atlanta Braves 67.11% Baltimore Orioles 73.62% Full NRFI 46.00% Rank 6 Odds -110 Milwaukee Brewers 72.37% St. Louis Cardinals 70.13% Full NRFI 35.89% Rank 15 Odds 105 Texas Rangers 65.76% San Francisco Giants 68.38% Full NRFI 42.60% Rank 10 Odds 130 Colorado Rockies 74.23% Chicago Cubs 73.69% Full NRFI 41.38% Rank 11 Odds 110 Los Angeles Angels 67.69% Seattle Mariners 75.44% Full NRFI 50.59% Rank 3 Odds -130 San Diego Padres 75.14% Arizona Diamondbacks 69.28% Full NRFI 40.66% Rank 13 Odds 105 Washington Nationals 71.37% https://preview.redd.it/rse2jp6t5g4b1.png?width=479&format=png&auto=webp&s=5606f09d65c2714bee631175df2ed7c9785f3b94 Yes I choose two games without a 50%. But both games have a low chance per team. (Except for the red sox cheating bastards) |
2023.06.06 19:05 Kai-F0x Why now is THE best time to start Higan.
2023.06.06 18:43 dsaling Looking for new zero turn 54 inch
![]() | Ok so I've been looking for a residential 54 inch zero turn, been doing research online and think I have it narrowed down. In my research I've come across something that is mixed on reviews....my narrowed down search WAS a Husqvarna z254, Cub Cadet zt1 54, or Hustler Raptor xl 54. But when looking at the worst number "4" and "7"talk about the Cub and Husqvarna, on the flip side they make the best list and i can't find a review on Hustler. So my question is who has an honest opinion and/or a recommendation. Thank you. submitted by dsaling to lawnmowers [link] [comments] |
2023.06.06 18:37 moose1397 Yesterday the padres did there thing. Time to go bigger today
![]() | submitted by moose1397 to sportsbetting [link] [comments] |
2023.06.06 17:37 travisdorr 2023 Topps Heritage Error
![]() | submitted by travisdorr to baseballcards [link] [comments] |
2023.06.06 17:16 mingram r/baseball Players of the Week - Week 10:
Name | Team | Votes | IP | H | ER | BB | SO | HR | ERA | BF | WHIP | BAbip | SO9 | SO/W |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marcus Stroman | CHC | 10 | 15.0 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 0.00 | 55 | 0.600 | .139 | 8.4 | 3.50 |
Miles Mikolas | STL | 2 | 13.0 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 1.38 | 53 | 1.077 | .333 | 8.3 | 12.00 |
Alex Cobb | SF | 1 | 7.2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | 27 | 0.652 | .250 | 8.2 | ∞ |
Name | Team | Votes | IP | H | ER | BB | SO | HR | ERA | BF | WHIP | BAbip | SO9 | SO/W |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nathan Eovaldi | TEX | 7 | 11.0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 0.00 | 41 | 0.727 | .192 | 9.0 | 3.67 |
Chris Bassitt | TOR | 2 | 7.2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0.00 | 27 | 0.391 | .158 | 9.4 | ∞ |
Kevin Gausman | TOR | 2 | 6.2 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 0.00 | 25 | 1.050 | .417 | 14.9 | 5.50 |
Tyler Wells | BAL | 1 | 11.1 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 2.38 | 45 | 0.882 | .269 | 12.7 | 8.00 |
Alek Manoah | TOR | 1 | 4.0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4.50 | 18 | 1.500 | .167 | 4.5 | 0.67 |
Name | Team | Votes | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mookie Betts | LAD | 9 | 25 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | .360 | .429 | .840 | 1.269 |
Luis Arraez | MIA | 2 | 23 | 2 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | .522 | .539 | .652 | 1.191 |
Ke'Bryan Hayes | PIT | 1 | 20 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | .450 | .450 | .900 | 1.350 |
Eddie Rosario | ATL | 1 | 20 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | .400 | .400 | 1.000 | 1.400 |
Name | Team | Votes | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jake Bauers | NYY | 5 | 17 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 0 | .412 | .500 | 1.059 | 1.559 |
Will Brennan | CLE | 4 | 21 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | .524 | .565 | .762 | 1.327 |
Aaron Judge | NYY | 2 | 17 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | .294 | .455 | 1.059 | 1.513 |
Masataka Yoshida | BOS | 2 | 23 | 5 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | .435 | .519 | .739 | 1.258 |
2023.06.06 13:58 Windgesang_ Hunter of the moon (Lunacub guide)
![]() | Finally, the fifth deadeye of the game is here. I’ve been waiting for her for 7 months now. Except she has a few slight issues with her kit (yes I’m saying it straight from the start). submitted by Windgesang_ to arknights [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/5zi7odhiwd4b1.png?width=1600&format=png&auto=webp&s=73ca2477d91066c08a463f70924313213396ca9e OverviewLunacub is a 5* Deadeye Sniper focusing on Camouflage. With the ability to stay camouflaged nigh-permanently, she is capable of staying deep in the enemy lines to deal some damage before everyone else, making it the next best thing to global range.Stats
Similar to all those top ATK branch, they have a pretty slow attack interval to “compensate” at 2.7 seconds, one of the slowest of the game.
Why is her HP that high? Because for some reason they decided to give her +300 HP as trust bonus, on a unit designed to have nigh-permanent Camouflage. It’s the same trust bonus as Andreana – another Deadeye – at +300 HP +40 ATK, so it’s not unprecedented, but why not going for the full ATK like Firewatch. For a number example, at max level and max module, she gets 1996 HP. That’s extremely high for a ranged unit. Anyway aside from that her DEF is pretty average for a sniper.
RangeDeadeye have one of the best range in the game.Deadeye range at base (left) and E1 onward (right) They have the ability to reach a bit further forward than Marksman and 2 tiles further to their side which really enhance their positioning aspect because they’ll usually be able to reach the enemies even with awkward placement. Especially for Lunacub, she has even less of a positioning issue thanks to her Camo. TraitPrioritise attacking the enemy with the lowest DEF in range firstThe Deadeye’s trait is a weird one. It’s unpredictable unless you have a solid grasp of the enemy’s stats or you are in your second attempt of the map already. It can be helpful because Casters and most ranged enemies tend to have lower DEF than their melee kin so you can take them out earlier. It’s not always true, but it’s a good starting point. But it’s not all bad. It also prevents them from ever being distracted. There’s a typical strat that they would spawn ranged enemies following behind a defender or an elite which would usually lead to most ST units to aim at the defender instead of the ranged one, even when both are blocked. These snipers however, can snipe out those ranged enemies in advance. The same goes for enemies with Taunt (“more likely to be targeted” or “draws enemy fire” in the game’s description), the Deadeyes ignore that and only care about the DEF stats. They also count DEF debuff/buff as well. If you have Shamare or something to reduce DEF, those guys are definitely more likely to be targeted by a Deadeye. The reverse case is someone like a Guerilla Herald, who buffs DEF for everyone but themselves and have low DEF. The Deadeyes usually target these Heralds first. Anyway, the targeting will be annoying to get used to. Talent: Wilderness InstinctAvailable at E1: Gains [Camouflage] while this unit’s skill is not active[Camouflage]: Prevents being targeted by enemy attacks if the unit is not blocking (but will still take Splash damage) This is the main identity for Luna, being a unit with a nigh-permanent Camouflage buff. As stated, camouflage prevents enemies from targeting the user, but they will still take Splash damage. This Splash damage refer to most attacks that deals damage in an area. https://i.redd.it/yh87frcrwd4b1.gif But what’s not expected is that some attacks that looks like it should be doing damage in an AoE still wouldn’t hit camouflaged unit. For examples, Sui’s thunderbolt, Degenbrecher’s area disarm, Dorothy’s… boss thingy that deals AoE damage that split evenly between all allies, etc. My guess is that due to how these skill works, they would still have to find the unit first… or something. Idk why either Altars – the cold one from chapter 6 and the true damage one from chapter 7 – for some reason doesn’t affect Camo despite being completely an AoE effect. This is made worse with the fact that the true damage altar actually hit invisible units, the status that is in essence “better Camo”. But this is the only exception so far, since the cold altar doesn’t hit either of those. I think they just forgot to fix and is now too late to fix There are also some AoE skills that only activate if the enemy sees someone to attack. This usually means Camouflaged unit can avoid those skills, with the only exception so far is IS#2 Phantom’s AoE attack which can target an ally through Camouflage. -if you don't see a GIF that means I was too lazy to run IS#2 again to get a recording but you can take my words for this Her Camouflage is tied to her non-skill state though, so does this mean that if her skill is up, she will be vulnerable again? Nope because she has that extra HP hah. That and her skill is also designed accordingly with this talent, though we will have to wait until the Skill section for that. Anyway, the second clause of the talent is that her attack interval is reduced when skill is active. This is a 15% reduction to her base amount of 2.7 seconds and is calculated before any Attack Speed (ASPD) buff. Her new attack interval with skill up, without any other ASPD, is 2.3 seconds (in 30 FPS context, that’s 69 frames, which is nice). Spoiler I guess, but her module level 3 increases this reduction to 25%, which makes her attack interval 2.03 seconds instead. Skills
This is not much useful, considering that her other base skill isn’t used constantly either. But this essentially means that Luna will recover morale fast after working in the base. Available at E2 – Wilderness Survival: When this Operator is assigned to the Workshop to process Skill Summaries, the production rate of byproduct increases by 80%. Admittedly, this is the highest % chance to get byproduct for Skill Summaries (aside from Nine-Colored Deer). But, like I said, you won’t use this skill and craft skill books that much. As in, eventually, your Skill Summaries acquisition rate will be slow enough that you will only be able to craft once every long while, unless you're actively farming CA-5 (like refresh-with-OP level of actively). Side note, if you have Hellagur, he has access to this skill straight from the get-go. First skill: Time to Hunt
18 seconds duration, 24 SP cost, 8 initial SP Auto Recovery, manual activation
This is exactly like ATK Up γ, except with a much shorter duration and cooldown. Presumably, the rotation was reduced with her talent in mind, to minimize the time when she’s vulnerable to attacks.
Technically, if she’s still vulnerable to attacks when this skill is up, we can fix that by properly timed the skill when there are no more ranged enemies around. But doing that negates the upside of short cooldown. This skill doesn’t look too promising, not because it’s inherently bad. Rather, it pretty much removes Luna’s main identity unless you’re extremely good with skill timing and all that. And furthermore, Andreana also has an S1 with the same +100% ATK, with similar attack rate (2.2 seconds vs Luna’s 2.033 assuming both have mod3), and Andreana’s ASPD is always active and not just during skill, and, Andreana has DEA–Ⲭ which gives her potentially even more damage. You can definitely use it because it is Luna’s only method of gaining even more ATK, so that she can actually kill stronger enemies (or at least almost kill because now the short duration can actually hurt). Second skill: Umbrial Ambush
25 seconds duration, 54 SP cost, 25 initial SP Auto Recovery, manual activation
50 SP cost, 30 initial SP
Luna gains 5 (8) seconds of Camouflage upon using this skill and 7 (8) seconds upon getting a kill during the skill duration. These duration don’t stacks. That is to say, Luna will only remains in Camouflage for the next 7/8 seconds after getting a kill, regardless of when it happened. Luna herself has to be the one delivering the killing blow to receive the Camouflage.
But that’s exactly where the issue is. She has to kill things constantly during her skill to achieve this permanent Camouflage. (In a perfect scenario, she would need to kill only 3 enemies if it’s perfectly spaced out every 7.9 seconds.) She doesn’t get any +ATK with this skill, it’s pure ASPD. Meaning despite her high base ATK, that’s all she wrote. In general, her ATK is similar to a Marksman with +100% ATK, while her skill attack interval is similar to a Marksman (or shorter with mod3). Wait a minute, a Marksman with +100% ATK and Camouflage??? Oh my god RIP Ap… Jokes aside, this idea forces Luna to only use this skill when there are kill-able mobs around. Which sounds fine, skill issue and all, but because of the lack of ATK it severely reduces the type of mobs that she can kill within 8 seconds, relegating it to mostly trash mobs. And this is why I have always use “nigh-permanent” when talking about her Camouflage. In theory, she can roll over trash mobs and feed her Camo constantly. In practice, that uhhh… depends on a lot of things: skill issues, wave flow, amount and flow of trash mobs. Basically, even the most skillful player can still find scenarios where they can’t use the skill regardless. Maybe the 50 SP cost is because you’re not going to be able to use this skill constantly anyway. ModulesDEA–У
ATK +55 Trait upgraded: Prioritise attacking the enemy with the lowest DEF in range first; If the attacked enemy remains alive, gain 1 additional SP Analysis: As with Firewatch’s module, this module seeks to improve her skill rotation. Sadly, HG knew they are going to give her this DEA–У module, so they masterfully “balanced” her primary skill by increasing its SP cost to 50. Anyway, Lunacub was released during a time when HG had already realised that SP cost should just stay low. With her DEA–У module, her S2 50 SP cost can be brought down to a minimum of about 36? But then, why not give her 40 SP cost and then give her DEA–Ⲭ instead? I know I have discovered that DEA–Ⲭ doesn’t give that much boost at mid-range but something is better than nothing. Well, that’s enough rant for this section. You can technically use S1 and have an extremely low downtime though, similar to Firewatch S1 (same SP cost and all), though with a much shorter skill duration. Admittedly, her S2 is her identity skill and this mod helps “fix” the SP cost. So yes, it’s a very important mod for Luna. Important note: the attacked enemy has to lose HP in order for DEA-У to give SP. That is to say, if the target dodged or negated the damage with Barrier (Big Sad Lock, SSS Sloma tower boss…), these Deadeyes will not get SP.
ATK +63 Talent upgraded: Gains [Camouflage] while this unit’s skill is not active; Attack interval reduced slightly after skill activation (-20%). {Upgraded from -15%}
ATK +68 Talent upgraded: Gains [Camouflage] while this unit’s skill is not active; Attack interval reduced after skill activation (-25%). {Upgraded from -20%} Analysis: This is a pretty sizeable boost to her attack interval. As mentioned before, it decreases her S1 attack interval from 2.3 seconds to 2.033 seconds, and her S2M3 attack interval from 0.97 seconds to 0.83. Module upgrades materials are pretty limited, so in the grand scheme, this module is not worth it because Luna herself is not worth it. But for Lunacub specifically, this module is very good if you want to stick with her. It covers her S2 SP cost, gives her even more attack rate for both skills, and provides her with more ATK which she will definitely need if you use S2. Concluding thoughtsLunacub is designed to stay in Camouflage and snipe enemies from really dangerous position. Unless if there are AoE environmental hazards (altars excluded) or enemies that deal AoE damage without needing to target anything (like the mushroom from SN). If she can feed off of mobs, she can stay in Camouflage permanently
Another comparison is someone I made a joke about way earlier: April. Both are Camo Sniper that revolves around being capable of going deep in the enemy’s line and kill something (maybe). With both of their S2 up, they have similar stats: 1200 ATK and about 1 second attack interval. The advantage here isn’t any skill rotation or DPS or whatever, but that April has guaranteed 26 seconds Camo duration whereas Luna needs to get kills. This guaranteed duration allows her to spend time killing (or at least wounding) the stronger enemies unlike Luna who only have a third of that time. Also, April only needs that deployment slot when she’s ready, while Luna has to hog it the entire time. April has an easier time moving around the map. Luna’s only advantages are range, which are rarely seen and/or are not hard to work around, and more importantly her off-skill state for long duration fighting (like I said, something is better than nothing), for example against global range mechanics like Faust or Talulah. But those are comparisons made while focusing on their innate mechanics of Invi/Camo. What about their designed role? Who else is designed to be stationed deep in the enemies line, having specific talent that will allow them to stay alive in the thick of things, to deal damage before anyone else? That’s right, it is time to talk about Kira… Throughout this whole thing you might have noticed that I have been constantly saying that Luna is incapable of killing anything but trash mobs. That’s technically not true of course. But given the design of Luna’s kit, her most unique role is to stay undetected behind the enemy’s line to deal damage, and in order to do that she needs to kill an enemy every 7.9 seconds (btw I hope you understand why I keep saying 7.9 instead of 8). Given this time restriction and the fact that she gets no extra ATK boost, the only thing she can kill within that time are basic mobs. Basic here actually covers a wide array of weak fodders: slugs, doggos, literal basic mobs, their archer version, and their caster version, with some occasional drones. So as much as I keep saying “limited” to trash mobs, it’s a bigger list than it seems. The downside here is that it’s trash mobs, there are plenty of ways of killing trash mobs that don’t involve even 6*. If you are not using her unique talent, you are essentially using the worst Deadeye Sniper, if not just one of the worst 5* Snipers, with either of her skills (except for maybe Firewatch S1 against pure melee but she has an easy fix for that). No I’m not kidding. I’m not saying you are wrong to prefer using her. I’m just saying to expect accordingly. So plop her deep in the enemy lines, time her skill correctly, and you can have a unit that filters out trash mobs before they reach your frontline. That’s her best and only value. OutroSo uhh, how’s your 10 dupe Lunacub doing? Anyway, I really love the Deadeye branch in general, so I was kinda thrilled to see a new one announced 7 months ago on CN server. Too bad what we ended up getting is a ST Kirara but thankfully can actually survive and kill things. Still a great addition to my team though. Anyway thanks for reading I guess? Sellout All other guides in this post here. |
2023.06.06 11:03 AboverJulio1123 It’s not a lot but finally hit on baseball after 2 super close parlays
submitted by AboverJulio1123 to fanduel [link] [comments]
2023.06.06 10:32 Ok_Field_465 Fandom
2023.06.06 10:12 CarefulAmbition [SCAM REPORT] u/No-Fish-6880 is a scammer. Built trust by having successful trades and then took advantage of said trust to force victims to go first. Supposedly deleted their PayPal account for "no takebacks"- DON'T TRADE with this user! Discord ID: 896142680722124860 miko#4015
![]() | Hello everyone, it's about time the scam report on this person is done. u/No-Fish-6880 is a scammer and here's the evidence. (Long thread ahead) submitted by CarefulAmbition to GenshinTrades [link] [comments] Victim 1Victim 1 was new to trading and specifically said they wouldn't go first but they were in a rush, so they accepted to do it. The scammer claimed to have sent the money (200$) through PayPal, additionally claiming that the money had been sent already but would take about 1 day to send. Therefore, they would delete their PayPal account for "no takebacks".Now, here's the deal with PayPal: you cannot delete your account with any pending transactions. Furthermore, it would make no sense to make these claims for "no takebacks", as most trades are done through FnF (friends and family) - there is no way to open a dispute for a refund through FnF. To add to this, here's the deal with the time it takes for the money to get to the receiver: if the sender's PayPal account is linked to a credit/debit card, they will get the money within minutes of the transaction being done; if linked to a bank account, it takes 1-3 business days. (check screenshots) https://preview.redd.it/yrl74333pc4b1.jpg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0d292853a7fe72ec38ddb9216f6a76dc11c239f2 https://preview.redd.it/hbw94db5pc4b1.jpg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e3b94f50b9ac1e7a4322dd05f108d40c41400046 https://preview.redd.it/z3cvyni6pc4b1.jpg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e8904918d002e51f1a957613a723dff22cb654fc https://preview.redd.it/hbvql1w7pc4b1.jpg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f65d9373b8a6f4d88078189b5cf4506ce7e4c996 https://preview.redd.it/1hotw009pc4b1.jpg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cf37484011bd33196080619ed7fcc3816513e0c0 This victim chose to wait it out to see if the money would really be on its way, since the scammer claimed to have their account linked to the bank. After 1 day passed, the victim reached out to me and I confronted them as well. They deflected all scamming claims and then proceeded to delete all messages sent to me, as seen on the second screenshot. https://preview.redd.it/pzn709orqc4b1.png?width=575&format=png&auto=webp&s=74ed3e44a61051644ec997030fe214e4e8b3d710 https://preview.redd.it/6lzxlcqxqc4b1.png?width=566&format=png&auto=webp&s=ddf60871cb1b521af0616d791cb68d5f9185b84d Victim 1 has been trying to be in contact with Paypal but got no receipt on any fund being on their way. On the meantime, they found out the scammer blocked them. https://preview.redd.it/1wu48y75rc4b1.png?width=632&format=png&auto=webp&s=a60fe41c7ad8d77c3315dfcac211d94f78dd53eb https://preview.redd.it/4nqhkn38rc4b1.png?width=437&format=png&auto=webp&s=4b4dbaa62fe2e6e6dda1424a1b0cb71060a6fa2a Victim 2This victim was running into the "Too many requests" error while engaging on a trade with the scammer. To solve this, they sent an email to Hoyoverse so they could link the scammer's email to the account - and it worked. Everything okay so far. https://preview.redd.it/63rumjrwrc4b1.jpg?width=901&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3a1e1912c6712e060369922376e5d48d5ad32c16 This victim trusted the scammer's vouches and went first, as can be seen here:. Victim said the scammer acted "very innocent" through the trade, saying - once again - that the money would take time to get to the victim. They tried to manipulate the victim into not getting a MM, saying the fee for one would be around 50$. Victim was blocked by them on Instagram afterwards and scammer trashed their account (check above link for proof). https://preview.redd.it/qzwtk09bsc4b1.png?width=361&format=png&auto=webp&s=9d7dc26c3e51ab5ffc6e7747fdae644b0f6880a4 https://preview.redd.it/3dm3e0a9sc4b1.png?width=527&format=png&auto=webp&s=fa01f28f5dda1434bd8093dcf851c8a757369f4e victim was clueless regarding the expensive MM fee claims made by scammer Victim 3With this trader, the scammer tried to bribe them into going first by giving them an account for doing so. When the victim suggested getting a MM, the scammer made the excuse of them being expensive and hard to find (a lie). Luckily, this person didn't fall for it but it's still a red flag to lookout for when it comes to trading. https://preview.redd.it/u0nbnnyxtc4b1.png?width=1166&format=png&auto=webp&s=722d8decc7a967da7ceb59358517569989928c26 https://preview.redd.it/9toz1joltc4b1.png?width=1168&format=png&auto=webp&s=f83b0c3ec51d58eaa3371e7786f55920aa3a34b9 https://preview.redd.it/i9ev4485uc4b1.png?width=1178&format=png&auto=webp&s=b36488f16ba9ecd90c8cf347cb4f957b0d9c55c8 Other important informationdiscord: miko#4015https://preview.redd.it/aa2xrqlguc4b1.png?width=1156&format=png&auto=webp&s=1cf7521e6a958e3e7d67774e6dd46887c2f86b55 doesn't know what fnf is, yet claims to use PayPal - clear sign they have no clue how PayPal works to begin with. their instagram: stay.cubs (thank you to u/7878-) What to take from this reportVouches mean nothing.As seen per this report, this scammer made sure they built a rapport by making genuine trades just so they could make the other traders go first. Unfortunately, some will, regardless of all our advice to not do so. MMs are not expensive nor difficult to find.Despite this scammer's claims, MM fee are not that high nor are they difficult to find - if you can't find one here, there are plenty on discord: discord.gg/dear, discord.gg/asuri, discord.gg/hiyori are just 3 examples of accessible MM service discords that are KSF approved that are out there. If you're not sure how transactions online work, make your search on it BEFORE engaging on a trade.By any means, NEVER go first.This one's pretty self explanatory - better safe than sorry. As for the scammer's fate, we have acted on it already and will report them on KSF too. If anyone else has more proof to add to this report, please feel free to send u/CarefulAmbition a DM on it. Special thanks to: u/mrainnn, u/7878- and u/Smooth_Web2753 Thank you for reading and we wish you all take care and engage in safe trading. The GenshinTrades Mod Team |
2023.06.06 08:01 killer_tuna14 Chose all favorites for June 5th MLB. I hate the Blue Jays right now. 7/8 correct picks
![]() | submitted by killer_tuna14 to sportsbetting [link] [comments] |
2023.06.06 05:55 Responsible_Bad7812 Thanks for scaring the shit out of me Pirates 😐
![]() | submitted by Responsible_Bad7812 to Fliff [link] [comments] |
2023.06.06 05:44 ChiCubsbot Postgame Thread: 6/5 Cubs @ Padres
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
SD | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
SD | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | SO | BA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B | Odor | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .207 |
1B | Rivas | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .333 |
CF | Tatis Jr. | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .257 |
LF | Soto, J | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .248 |
3B | Machado, M | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .234 |
2B | Cronenworth | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .202 |
C | Sánchez | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | .259 |
DH | Carpenter | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .184 |
SS | Kim, Ha | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | .251 |
RF | Dixon | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .227 |
SD | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Snell | 6.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 109-67 | 4.06 |
Wilson, S | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17-11 | 2.48 |
Martinez, N | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15-9 | 2.59 |
Hill, T | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13-10 | 3.60 |
CHC | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | SO | BA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B | Hoerner | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .285 |
SS | Swanson | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .271 |
LF | Happ | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | .271 |
RF | Suzuki, S | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .267 |
3B | Wisdom | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | .203 |
DH | Gomes | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .275 |
DH | Mastrobuoni | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .170 |
1B | Mancini | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .241 |
C | Amaya | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .316 |
CF | Morel | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .256 |
CHC | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hendricks | 6.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 84-54 | 4.70 |
Assad | 2.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 38-19 | 4.94 |
Description | Length | Video |
---|---|---|
Bullpen availability for San Diego, June 5 vs Cubs | 0:07 | Video |
Bullpen availability for Chicago, June 5 vs Padres | 0:07 | Video |
Fielding alignment for San Diego, June 5 vs Cubs | 0:11 | Video |
Fielding alignment for Chicago, June 5 vs Padres | 0:11 | Video |
Starting lineups for Cubs at Padres - June 5, 2023 | 0:09 | Video |
A deep dive into Gary Sánchez's home run | 0:09 | Video |
The distance behind Gary Sánchez's home run | 0:14 | Video |
Blake Snell's outing against the Cubs | 0:23 | Video |
Breaking down Blake Snell's pitches | 0:08 | Video |
Breaking down Kyle Hendricks's pitches | 0:08 | Video |
Kyle Hendricks's outing against the Padres | 0:23 | Video |
Blake Snell fans Patrick Wisdom, escapes jam | 0:08 | Video |
Sánchez puts Padres on the board with a two-run HR | 0:27 | Video |
Tatis Jr. misses ball in center, Ian Happ singles | 0:11 | Video |
Ha-Seong Kim doubles to drive in Matt Carpenter | 0:39 | Video |
Manny Machado makes a great defensive stop in the 3rd | 0:17 | Video |
Jake Cronenworth singles to drive in Manny Machado | 0:16 | Video |
David Ross gets ejected in the 2nd on called ball | 0:50 | Video |
Kyle Hendricks strikes out Juan Soto to end the 1st | 0:06 | Video |
Steven Wilson K's Christopher Morel in the 7th inning | 0:08 | Video |
Matt Carpenter drives home Manny Machado in the 8th | 0:21 | Video |
Miguel Amaya flies out to right fielder Brandon Dixon. | 0:11 | Video |
Winning Pitcher | Losing Pitcher | Save |
---|---|---|
Snell (2-6, 4.06 ERA) | Hendricks (0-2, 4.70 ERA) |
2023.06.06 05:44 FriarBot [Post Game Thread] Chicago Cubs (26-33) @ San Diego Padres (28-32) 6/5
Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cubs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Padres | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 0 |
Cubs Batters | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | K | LOB | AVG | OPS | Padres Batters | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | K | LOB | AVG | OPS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Hoerner 2B | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .285 | .735 | 1 Odor 2B | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | .207 | .693 | |
2 Swanson SS | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | .271 | .791 | 1-Rivas 1B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .333 | 1.167 | |
3 Happ LF | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | .271 | .790 | 2 Tatis Jr. CF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .257 | .801 | |
4 Suzuki, S RF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | .267 | .800 | 3 Soto, J LF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .248 | .883 | |
5 Wisdom 3B | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | .203 | .780 | 4 Machado, M 3B | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .234 | .653 | |
6 Gomes DH | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .275 | .755 | 5 Cronenworth 2B | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | .202 | .676 | |
a-Mastrobuoni DH | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .170 | .487 | 6 Sánchez C | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | .259 | .893 | |
7 Mancini 1B | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | .241 | .657 | 7 Carpenter DH | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .184 | .655 | |
8 Amaya C | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | .316 | .891 | 8 Kim, Ha SS | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .251 | .742 | |
9 Morel CF | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .256 | .959 | 9 Dixon RF | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | .227 | .621 | |
Totals | 31 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 17 | Totals | 32 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 11 |
BATTING | BATTING | |
TB: Gomes; Happ; Hoerner; Mastrobuoni. | 2B: Carpenter (10, Hendricks); Kim, Ha (10, Hendricks); Machado, M (8, Hendricks). | |
Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Suzuki, S 2; Wisdom. | HR: Sánchez (3, 2nd inning off Hendricks, 1 on, 1 out). | |
Team RISP: 0-for-4. | TB: Carpenter 2; Cronenworth; Dixon; Kim, Ha 3; Machado, M 4; Sánchez 4. | |
Team LOB: 8. | RBI: Carpenter (25); Cronenworth (21); Kim, Ha (19); Sánchez 2 (7). | |
2-out RBI: Cronenworth. | ||
Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Odor; Tatis Jr.; Dixon 2. | ||
FIELDING | SF: Carpenter. | |
PB: Amaya (1). | Team RISP: 2-for-7. | |
Team LOB: 7. | ||
Cubs Pitchers | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA | Padres Pitchers | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hendricks (L, 0-2) | 6.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4.70 | Snell (W, 2-6) | 6.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 4.06 | |
Assad | 2.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4.94 | Wilson, S | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2.48 | |
Martinez, N | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2.59 | ||||||||||
Hill, T | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3.60 | ||||||||||
Totals | 8.0 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | Totals | 9.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 0 |
2023.06.06 04:40 Ikestrman Daily Pick'Em Thread Tuesday, 06/06/2023 Game day
Matchup and Team Records | Probable Pitchers (Season ERA) | Estimated Win Probability |
---|---|---|
Minnesota Twins (31-29) @ Tampa Bay Rays (43-19) | Louie Varland (3.51) / Zach Eflin (3.30) | 42% / 58% |
Detroit Tigers (26-32) @ Philadelphia Phillies (28-32) | Tyler Alexander (6.38) / Taijuan Walker (5.65) | 37% / 63% |
Kansas City Royals (18-42) @ Miami Marlins (33-28) | Zack Greinke (4.19) / Jesus Luzardo (4.05) | 38% / 62% |
Arizona Diamondbacks (35-25) @ Washington Nationals (25-34) | Tommy Henry (3.73) / Jake Irvin (5.67) | 54% / 46% |
Oakland Athletics (12-50) @ Pittsburgh Pirates (32-27) | James Kaprielian (8.12) / Mitch Keller (3.25) | 36% / 64% |
Chicago White Sox (26-35) @ New York Yankees (36-25) | Lucas Giolito (4.08) / Clarke Schmidt (5.01) | 36% / 64% |
Houston Astros (36-24) @ Toronto Blue Jays (33-28) | Hunter Brown (3.61) / Kevin Gausman (2.76) | 48% / 52% |
Boston Red Sox (30-30) @ Cleveland Guardians (27-32) | James Paxton (4.26) / Shane Bieber (3.72) | 46% / 54% |
Los Angeles Dodgers (35-25) @ Cincinnati Reds (27-33) | Tony Gonsolin (1.77) / Luke Weaver (5.36) | 61% / 39% |
New York Mets (30-30) @ Atlanta Braves (35-24) | Carlos Carrasco (5.74) / Bryce Elder (1.92) | 43% / 57% |
Baltimore Orioles (37-22) @ Milwaukee Brewers (32-28) | Kyle Gibson (3.89) / Freddy Peralta (4.62) | 45% / 55% |
St. Louis Cardinals (25-35) @ Texas Rangers (38-20) | Matthew Liberatore (4.91) / Dane Dunning (2.06) | 43% / 57% |
San Francisco Giants (29-30) @ Colorado Rockies (26-35) | John Brebbia (3.80) / Dinelson Lamet (13.17) | 55% / 45% |
Chicago Cubs (26-32) @ Los Angeles Angels (31-30) | Hayden Wesneski (4.81) / Tyler Anderson (5.47) | 43% / 57% |
Seattle Mariners (29-30) @ San Diego Padres (27-32) | Logan Gilbert (4.08) / Joe Musgrove (4.71) | 43% / 57% |
2023.06.06 04:20 Amoeba-Few Don’t know if I shoulda stayed in but not taking risk… been on a losing streak lately
submitted by Amoeba-Few to fanduel [link] [comments]
2023.06.06 03:49 keradius Deck Motor Fault, LT42e 2020
![]() | I have an XT1 LT42e that i purchased back in 2020. It has about 40 hours of total run on it (it spent more days in the shop than hours mowing). I have a couple acres to mow. submitted by keradius to cubcadet [link] [comments] This year i managed to have a few runs but on the last one the motors shut off with Deck Motor Fault. Initially I assumed it may have overheated or the cables disconnected again from the vibrations (which happens regularly). However each time I try to restart the blades, they just engage and within milliseconds they stop and I get the "Deck Motor Fault" again. I removed the deck, cleaned it, removed and cleaned the blades, but still same behavior :( This mower has been nothing but pain. I already had 2 warranty calls on it with motors being swapped each time. But every trip to the shop costs me $250 to haul the mower there (not under warranty) and hundreds to have my property mowed by professionals as it usually takes weeks to repair. So i am hoping to avoid yet another trip to the shop. Are there any ways to diagnose further? Any advice on how to best engage Cub Cadet on this? I am still under warranty this year. |
2023.06.06 00:24 MaverickToboggan Battery on garden tractor keeps dying after use